2015 Cayman GT4
#46
IN - if car is $10k above GTS (manual)
IN - if car is $15k above GTS (PDK-S)
OUT - if car has CLs
OUT - if magazine price prediction is true. Won't pay that for any Cayman - regardless of hype - way to close $ to GT3 for my taste.
#47
Race Director
Hence, it will be for any one in a 991 GT3 to step down to 400 HP. After tasting 475 HP with a 9000 rpm redline it will be tough to drive any thing slower. 430 HP would be a narrower gap to consider if it has a Manual. Any thing less I will not bother. Plus, the 991 GT3 will be far more exclusive as the years pass by.
#48
#49
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Some magazines came up with ludicrously high US price estimates, because they always make a straight currency convervsion of the German-market price that includes VAT tax. We get a very good deal in US (we actually pay fewer US Dollars than the Germans pay Euros, so if you make a currency conversion you will overprice the car ~ 40% - this is what they always do). Somehow the magazines still don't have a clue about relative pricing in the various international markets.
#50
Rennlist Member
not cogent except for the few collectors who will store and hold it for 20 yrs in almost new condition
most GT owners whom you are speaking to here seem to be the enthusiast type who are first in line for latest GT3 and flipping from base to RS to next base to next RS and so on and so forth, not stockpilers.
most GT owners whom you are speaking to here seem to be the enthusiast type who are first in line for latest GT3 and flipping from base to RS to next base to next RS and so on and so forth, not stockpilers.
Last edited by MKW; 07-14-2014 at 01:56 PM.
#51
not cogent except for the few collectors who will store and hold it for 20 yrs in almost new condition
most GT owners whom you are speaking to here seem to be the enthusiast type who are first in line for latest GT3 and flipping from base to RS to next base to next RS and so on and so forth, not stockpilers.
most GT owners whom you are speaking to here seem to be the enthusiast type who are first in line for latest GT3 and flipping from base to RS to next base to next RS and so on and so forth, not stockpilers.
I fully appreciate that there are collector cars out there, and that being a collector is a passion for some folks. I don't think I'm wired that way. I wouldn't be able to keep my foot off the gas long enough for anything to appreciate!
-nh4.
#52
Drifting
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Belmont Shore in Long Beach CA
Posts: 2,740
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
The Epitome of Ferrari ownership. The more miles you put on it, the less it is worth. So it you want to make any money back on that Ferrari purchase, by-god don't drive it - just look at it.
#53
The July Panorama article notes 400 hp from 3.6 liters, and plans to homologate the car for GT racing, production in 2015. I assume that would mean GTE class?
The 3.6L displacement is a bit unusual, requiring either a new crank or new pistons, and only seems to make sense if the engine is used as the basis for homologation. If correct we can assume the new motor will share much in common with the race car. Current Le Mans rules require 2x 28.9 mm restrictor plates to be run for that displacement, which would limit race power to around 460 hp. Race weight is limited to >2739 lbs.
If one assumes a homologated race motor of 460 hp, a similar power level could be achieved in the street cars as well (the same specific power as the GT3 would yield 450 hp, and one suspects that if they de-stroke it then specific power would increase, yielding almost exactly 460 hp at 8500+). This suggests anything down in the 400 hp range would be considerably detuned. However if Porsche has changed their philosophy and finally sanctioned the Cayman as a race car, do they still feel the need to artificially limit it on the street as well? A de-stroked 991 GT3 engine would seem to make the basis for a very robust race car motor- piston speeds and stresses would be down, yielding more reliability as well as headroom. The question is, how much of that motor would we get?
All of the above is speculation, I certainly have no inside sources. However it certainly makes for a nice story. Detune that motor less and it sounds like a pretty epic car.
The 3.6L displacement is a bit unusual, requiring either a new crank or new pistons, and only seems to make sense if the engine is used as the basis for homologation. If correct we can assume the new motor will share much in common with the race car. Current Le Mans rules require 2x 28.9 mm restrictor plates to be run for that displacement, which would limit race power to around 460 hp. Race weight is limited to >2739 lbs.
If one assumes a homologated race motor of 460 hp, a similar power level could be achieved in the street cars as well (the same specific power as the GT3 would yield 450 hp, and one suspects that if they de-stroke it then specific power would increase, yielding almost exactly 460 hp at 8500+). This suggests anything down in the 400 hp range would be considerably detuned. However if Porsche has changed their philosophy and finally sanctioned the Cayman as a race car, do they still feel the need to artificially limit it on the street as well? A de-stroked 991 GT3 engine would seem to make the basis for a very robust race car motor- piston speeds and stresses would be down, yielding more reliability as well as headroom. The question is, how much of that motor would we get?
All of the above is speculation, I certainly have no inside sources. However it certainly makes for a nice story. Detune that motor less and it sounds like a pretty epic car.
#54
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
The lower cost and higher torque of an X51 motor might make the better business case for Porsche (and is in line with rumors I've heard). If they do that, I still hope they spring for the separate oil tank.
If they do surprise me and give a >425hp destroked GT3 motor with 9k rpm and dry sump, I personally am prepared to pay a little extra (assuming manual gearbox option).
#56
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
If you were replying to my suggestion that we might get the 3.8L X51 motor, then torque would be same as GT3 but redline is only 7,800 (with power peak at 7,500).
The first choice would be killer and very aggressive feeling - the second would be torquier and better around town. I vote for #1.
#57
Not sure if you were replying to Pete or me, but a destroked GT3 motor would result in less torque (displacement), so you'd want to keep the high redline there (9k would be much less stressful on a destroked version).
If you were replying to my suggestion that we might get the 3.8L X51 motor, then torque would be same as GT3 but redline is only 7,800 (with power peak at 7,500).
The first choice would be killer and very aggressive feeling - the second would be torquier and better around town. I vote for #1.
If you were replying to my suggestion that we might get the 3.8L X51 motor, then torque would be same as GT3 but redline is only 7,800 (with power peak at 7,500).
The first choice would be killer and very aggressive feeling - the second would be torquier and better around town. I vote for #1.
I don't know that an X-51 version makes an ideal basis for homologation- it seems you'd need to change quite a lot of parts between street and race versions to get the reliability and power they need. Simply sharing street and track parts worked well for previous GT3 motors, why not again? Of course they don't need to share much- the Cayenne V8 that won Daytona shared very little with the street motor.
Same question on the chassis- they have been using double wishbones on the front of the RSRs for a while now, but the street cars haven't seen them yet. It'll be very tempting to go the same route to improve the kinematics and compliances for the Cayman race car, question is will the street cars get the good stuff or not? The car might get pricey if they do...
#58
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
A 3.6L would still have a similar torque to weight ratio as the 3.8L GT3, given the lighter chassis. I know PDK would suit this engine well, but so would a 7 speed close-ratio manual, imo (I don't mind lots of shifting). But a 6spd is more likely and I could still make due there. PDK-S is certainly faster, but I just want to have fun.
#59
Depends on the state of tune. At 400 hp it'd be no problem, but if they're chasing the 460 hp level the air restrictors allow it'd be worse. And the 991 GT3 already has a big torque hole that makes a manual look dicey... Still, there is something to be said for needing to wind a motor out.
#60
Same question on the chassis- they have been using double wishbones on the front of the RSRs for a while now, but the street cars haven't seen them yet. It'll be very tempting to go the same route to improve the kinematics and compliances for the Cayman race car, question is will the street cars get the good stuff or not? The car might get pricey if they do...
We saw that both the 650S and 458 Speciale have double wishbones in the front and the GT3 has Macpherson struts.
The McLaren also has them in the rear while both the Porsche and Ferrari have multi-links.
Is Porsche trying to save us a few pennies here with a non-ideal solution or is it simply the expression of a different philosophy?
Thx in advance.