Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reverse Camera and Parking Sensors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2014, 07:22 PM
  #16  
911SLOW
Admin
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
911SLOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Athens
Posts: 11,010
Likes: 0
Received 122 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mooty
hum....
lol
Old 01-30-2014, 08:27 AM
  #17  
RINGMEISTER27
Racer
 
RINGMEISTER27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 495
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rear camera, heated seats, nav.. seriously people are we forgetting what a GT3 is? You might as well hire Mr. Belvedere to chauffeur on trackdays. SIGH!

Name:  IYM3rVK.gif
Views: 191
Size:  913.6 KB
Old 01-30-2014, 11:59 AM
  #18  
sechsgang
Rennlist Member
 
sechsgang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ...PA...
Posts: 3,941
Received 961 Likes on 456 Posts
Default

Uh, this GT3 as far as Im concerned with all the tech is a great sporty road car...if you want a race car, get a damn racecar. I'm getting this car to look really cool on the road and throw thumbs up at everyone anyways. Ugh, I'm going to be sooooooo popular...
Old 01-30-2014, 04:24 PM
  #19  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,270
Received 259 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CRex
It's not an unfair statement that folks who find creature comforts like memory seats, rear cameras and sensors and what not desirable features, will find a better product in the TT. That's also a more capable car in the hands of that segment of customers.
The car has a mandatory screen in the dashboard. It might as well be useful.

Same with the power seat option - AFAIC, it is worthless without a memory setting.

Don't get me wrong - I am all about the GT3 being a hard-core track car with a minimum of conveniences a la the 996, and I would not order either of the above - but both are useful in a paddock. Lighted personalized door sills are not.

Last edited by Alan Smithee; 01-30-2014 at 05:13 PM.
Old 01-30-2014, 05:51 PM
  #20  
Serge944
Rennlist Member
 
Serge944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: California
Posts: 8,022
Likes: 0
Received 55 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

I dunno guys, a rear view camera is actually pretty damn useful in a street car. After all, a GT3 is a street car.

If you think these technologies make your GT3 less hard core, you bought the wrong *****-extension.
Old 01-30-2014, 06:06 PM
  #21  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Serge944
I dunno guys, a rear view camera is actually pretty damn useful in a street car. After all, a GT3 is a street car.

If you think these technologies make your GT3 less hard core, you bought the wrong *****-extension.
haha...I agree.
Old 01-30-2014, 06:39 PM
  #22  
mhh
Instructor
 
mhh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia and Bucks, UK
Posts: 221
Received 31 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by reidry
I am considering adding a wifi backup camera when I get my car, links up to your cell phone.

Ryan
I considered it too. Until I realized that my phone would be in my pocket.
Old 01-30-2014, 06:46 PM
  #23  
sgroer
Rennlist Member
 
sgroer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 3,538
Received 1,013 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

There are aftermarket options that integrate with the nav screen. I, for one, will swallow my pride and get it installed.
http://www.tadibrothers.com/Catalog/...-Camera-System
Old 01-30-2014, 06:47 PM
  #24  
sechsgang
Rennlist Member
 
sechsgang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: ...PA...
Posts: 3,941
Received 961 Likes on 456 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Serge944
I dunno guys, a rear view camera is actually pretty damn useful in a street car. After all, a GT3 is a street car.

If you think these technologies make your GT3 less hard core, you bought the wrong *****-extension.
+2
Old 01-30-2014, 06:52 PM
  #25  
timothymoffat
Rennlist Member
 
timothymoffat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rainforest (Vancouver, BC)
Posts: 7,512
Received 981 Likes on 434 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RayDBonz
Depends on what you want - an intelligent car, or an intelligent driver.
This. So much of this technology encourages laziness on the part of the driver.
Old 01-30-2014, 06:55 PM
  #26  
sgroer
Rennlist Member
 
sgroer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 3,538
Received 1,013 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by timothymoffat
This. So much of this technology encourages laziness on the part of the driver.
Some situations are simply not avoidable, regardless of how "intelligent" the driver is.

http://www.kidsandcars.org/back-overs.html

In the U.S. at least fifty children are being backed over by vehicles EVERY week. Forty-eight (48) are treated in hospital emergency rooms and at least two (2) children are fatally injured every WEEK.

• The predominant age of victims is one year olds. (12€23 months)

• Over 60% of backing up incidents involved a larger size vehicle. (truck, van, SUV)

• Tragically, in over 70% of these incidents, a parent or close relative is behind the wheel.
Old 01-30-2014, 07:04 PM
  #27  
timothymoffat
Rennlist Member
 
timothymoffat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rainforest (Vancouver, BC)
Posts: 7,512
Received 981 Likes on 434 Posts
Default

I get it. Unfortunately I'm a firm believer that there are simply too many distractions in today's cars. Heavy reliance on electronics and electronic devices to "save us" results in people becoming less aware of their circumstances and surroundings when driving. In other words, if people would put down/turn off the phone/DVD/camera/satnav/fridge/whatever and pay attention to the job at hand, we'd be better off. Driving should NOT be part of multitasking.
Old 01-30-2014, 07:16 PM
  #28  
MaxLTV
Rennlist Member
 
MaxLTV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,188
Received 1,150 Likes on 568 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mhh
I considered it too. Until I realized that my phone would be in my pocket.
It can vibrate if you back into something
Old 01-30-2014, 07:18 PM
  #29  
mhh
Instructor
 
mhh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Adelaide, South Australia and Bucks, UK
Posts: 221
Received 31 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by timothymoffat
I get it. Unfortunately I'm a firm believer that there are simply too many distractions in today's cars. Heavy reliance on electronics and electronic devices to "save us" results in people becoming less aware of their circumstances and surroundings when driving. In other words, if people would put down/turn off the phone/DVD/camera/satnav/fridge/whatever and pay attention to the job at hand, we'd be better off. Driving should NOT be part of multitasking.
All true - optional parking sensors that make the driver aware of his surroundings would be a great idea.
Old 01-30-2014, 07:29 PM
  #30  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,959
Received 339 Likes on 208 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sgroer
Some situations are simply not avoidable, regardless of how "intelligent" the driver is. http://www.kidsandcars.org/back-overs.html In the U.S. at least fifty children are being backed over by vehicles EVERY week. Forty-eight (48) are treated in hospital emergency rooms and at least two (2) children are fatally injured every WEEK. • The predominant age of victims is one year olds. (12€23 months) • Over 60% of backing up incidents involved a larger size vehicle. (truck, van, SUV) • Tragically, in over 70% of these incidents, a parent or close relative is behind the wheel.
Geez...is that why the GT3 should have a backup camera?!


Quick Reply: Reverse Camera and Parking Sensors?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:10 AM.