Gt3 6sp vs 19 gt3rs
#6
im not a believer in the benefits of PCCB for 90% of people (although i have them and consider them a must option based on visual appeal alone). However I do think that the longevity of them, on non tracked cars is a really nice selling point (although still not worth that much coin really). But I do wonder what the benefit of sig reduction in unsprung mass are, again i don't think that would delete PDK's advantage and the supposed extra power of the RS (which im not sure is actually a thing). PDK is superior to manual in all aspects of performance, but maybe given the short pull of this race the manual was already in the correct gear and the road speed allowed the manual to be in maximum power where as the pdk gearing was just off a little. From a dig the pdk will walk a manual all day.
#7
Pro
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
#9
#11
Race Director
Originally Posted by RX2DO
im not a believer in the benefits of PCCB for 90% of people (although i have them and consider them a must option based on visual appeal alone). However I do think that the longevity of them, on non tracked cars is a really nice selling point (although still not worth that much coin really). But I do wonder what the benefit of sig reduction in unsprung mass are, again i don't think that would delete PDK's advantage and the supposed extra power of the RS (which im not sure is actually a thing). PDK is superior to manual in all aspects of performance, but maybe given the short pull of this race the manual was already in the correct gear and the road speed allowed the manual to be in maximum power where as the pdk gearing was just off a little. From a dig the pdk will walk a manual all day.
Originally Posted by n d
I thought the extra hp plus pdk the rs would win..... how is this possible?
#12
]The advantage of unsprung mass wouldn't show up in a straight line, it's during dynamic changes, curves, bump absorption where you could tell a difference. Multiple tests show that ceramics work to maintain more consistent stopping distances over many attempts, where steel could fade. Not in any way related to anything with this test
The new 4.0 is a different animal.
The new 4.0 is a different animal.
#13
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by RX2DO;15671036[b
]im not a believer in the benefits of PCCB for 90% of people (although i have them and consider them a must option based on visual appeal alone). However I do think that the longevity of them, on non tracked cars is a really nice selling point (although still not worth that much coin really). But I do wonder what the benefit of sig reduction in unsprung mass are, again i don't think that would delete PDK's advantage and the supposed extra power of the RS (which im not sure is actually a thing). PDK is superior to manual in all aspects of performance, but maybe given the short pull of this race the manual was already in the correct gear and the road speed allowed the manual to be in maximum power where as the pdk gearing was just off a little. From a dig the pdk will walk a manual all day.
But here we are.
#14
Three Wheelin'
im not a believer in the benefits of PCCB for 90% of people (although i have them and consider them a must option based on visual appeal alone). However I do think that the longevity of them, on non tracked cars is a really nice selling point (although still not worth that much coin really). But I do wonder what the benefit of sig reduction in unsprung mass...