Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

AP on the GT3RS.2 and questions on suspension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2018, 03:46 AM
  #61  
Kobalt
Race Car
 
Kobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,848
Received 418 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by evilfij
Crossed arms, according to pretty much every psychologist and body language expert, is a subconscious manifestation of defensiveness.

As I am terrible at reading people naturally, I devoted time to studying gestures and such. Crossed arms is fairly well known.

I am not criticizing, I think the car is great, but AP had a reason to signal defensiveness when asked about the engine. What that is, we can only speculate.
I agree with you, but I think that AP is well aware of this body language and I think he is well aware of which questions are to be asked, so I'm not sure he defensive.
I also agree with fxz: Sometimes I'm crossing my arms because it just feels good...

Nevertheless, the conspiracy version is much more fun to talk about
Old 03-08-2018, 03:49 AM
  #62  
CRex
Rennlist Member
 
CRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Driver's Seat
Posts: 3,577
Received 381 Likes on 195 Posts
Default

^ Wow...

I'm not a fan of marketing speak. Not a fan of AP's exaggerations of the past either. That said, are we being too critical of the man?

He's at Geneva talking to dozens of people an hour. Catchpole grabs him for an interview on-location (unlike the majority of his past interviews which are studio-based)... now we're gonna psycho-analyze his gestures and extrapolate what we think he is or isn't comfortable with?

Let's deal with facts and not go overboard with speculations. Maybe this RS is great. Maybe it's crap. We'll know when we actually drive these things
Old 03-08-2018, 03:53 AM
  #63  
Kobalt
Race Car
 
Kobalt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 4,848
Received 418 Likes on 197 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CRex
Maybe it's crap.
I think it is safe to say it isn't.
Old 03-08-2018, 07:45 AM
  #64  
Asco
Racer
 
Asco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Dubai
Posts: 417
Received 92 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

He clearly isn't as excited about the .2 as he was about the .1 RS (evo video with him from Geneva 2015), but then again it's not a new model, just a facelift...
I will be less track oriented with this comment, but I'm really curious if the new PCM could be directly replaced to the .1 RS? Apple car play would be nice.. The wide side skirts are nice too..
Old 03-08-2018, 08:51 AM
  #65  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,520
Received 1,730 Likes on 916 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CRex
^ Wow...

I'm not a fan of marketing speak. Not a fan of AP's exaggerations of the past either. That said, are we being too critical of the man?

He's at Geneva talking to dozens of people an hour. Catchpole grabs him for an interview on-location (unlike the majority of his past interviews which are studio-based)... now we're gonna psycho-analyze his gestures and extrapolate what we think he is or isn't comfortable with?
:
Ha ha. Right on. And Blue Horseshoe loves Anacott Steel....
Old 03-08-2018, 09:55 AM
  #66  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 810 Likes on 424 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by golfnutintib
not a chance!!!!

but i will help you install new springs on your car so you don't get seasick from all the wallowing when you drive it over 40 mph

isn't it ridiculous how the marketing speak on the new ones tweak their best customers with the just bought ones? sheesh
zactly. So I guess all those glowing reviews of the .1RS by the likes of Chris Harris, Jethro, Walter Rohl, etc...just evaporate to nothingness. Sad.

Sader still this nonsense will repeat itself in perpetuity with each new GT3/Gt3RS. This is a rich man’s game.

I love my salmon sloth. If I get an allocation for a .2 at msrp and can make the purchase without having to bend over (too much) then fine. Otherwise I’ll just have to slow down on my Sunday drives to Dunkin Donuts around those turns for safety sake for fear of inadequate spring rates. Doesn’t the .2GT3 have the same spring rates as the .1RS? If so those guys better slow down too.

Cabdidly, I’m not real hot on the idea of a street car that is used at the track with near Cup suspension. The .1RS is borderline comfortable on the street and very stiff on the street on sport.



Old 03-08-2018, 10:29 AM
  #67  
djcxxx
Three Wheelin'
 
djcxxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,960
Received 348 Likes on 176 Posts
Default

I suspect his defensiveness is related to the people he has to deal with in the press and their audiences hanging on every word and gesture he utters and makes rather than a car that represents (to him) the natural incremental evolution over its predecessor.
Old 03-08-2018, 11:08 AM
  #68  
carcommander
Rennlist Member
 
carcommander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,264
Received 277 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer


zactly. So I guess all those glowing reviews of the .1RS by the likes of Chris Harris, Jethro, Walter Rohl, etc...just evaporate to nothingness. Sad.

Sader still this nonsense will repeat itself in perpetuity with each new GT3/Gt3RS. This is a rich man’s game.

I love my salmon sloth. If I get an allocation for a .2 at msrp and can make the purchase without having to bend over (too much) then fine. Otherwise I’ll just have to slow down on my Sunday drives to Dunkin Donuts around those turns for safety sake for fear of inadequate spring rates. Doesn’t the .2GT3 have the same spring rates as the .1RS? If so those guys better slow down too.

Cabdidly, I’m not real hot on the idea of a street car that is used at the track with near Cup suspension. The .1RS is borderline comfortable on the street and very stiff on the street on sport.



Well said. I have noticed that mine wallows around a lot on the way to the office.
Old 03-08-2018, 11:09 AM
  #69  
Taffy66
Burning Brakes
 
Taffy66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 784
Received 387 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

I'm willing to bet the RS engine is identical to the GT3's, and the GT3's motor was purposely detuned by software at above 8250 to 8500 revs to allow the RS bragging rights.
Old 03-08-2018, 11:54 AM
  #70  
Bossing
Rennlist Member
 
Bossing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,302
Received 89 Likes on 45 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Taffy66
I'm willing to bet the RS engine is identical to the GT3's, and the GT3's motor was purposely detuned by software at above 8250 to 8500 revs to allow the RS bragging rights.
I would not be surprised... after all, HP is TQ x RPM divided by the constant (5252). Hence more power can be calculated by increasing tq and rpm.... or conversely decreasing as well like if for example they purposely detuned the GT3's. We know tuning or ECM power management is key especially in differentiating power outputs (like for example again between the 3.2 and 3RS.2) so yup I won't be surprised at all. A numbers game.
Old 03-08-2018, 12:04 PM
  #71  
consolidated
Drifting
 
consolidated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,587
Received 11 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by djcxxx
I suspect his defensiveness is related to the people he has to deal with in the press and their audiences hanging on every word and gesture he utters and makes rather than a car that represents (to him) the natural incremental evolution over its predecessor.
He's thinking "Ugh, can't wait to see what those Rennlist babies say about this interview."
Old 03-08-2018, 01:36 PM
  #72  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,453
Received 3,799 Likes on 2,197 Posts
Default

.1 RS may be a better car than the .2 RS for road use. Those stiffer springs will improve track performance and precision, but may come at the price of significant harshness on mediocre or bad roads.
Old 03-08-2018, 03:29 PM
  #73  
Taffy66
Burning Brakes
 
Taffy66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 784
Received 387 Likes on 196 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
.1 RS may be a better car than the .2 RS for road use. Those stiffer springs will improve track performance and precision, but may come at the price of significant harshness on mediocre or bad roads.
I suspect you're not far off the mark here..As a fast engaging canyon destroying sports car the GT3 might hit the sweet spot..The much increased spring rates on the 3RS.2 could be detriment for any surface apart from a smooth track.
Old 03-08-2018, 04:31 PM
  #74  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,025
Received 1,188 Likes on 631 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
.1 RS may be a better car than the .2 RS for road use. Those stiffer springs will improve track performance and precision, but may come at the price of significant harshness on mediocre or bad roads.
I’m glad. The RS is supposed to be extremely track focused. If an RS is comfy to drive across 3 states, then they sacrificed too much track capability for cruising comfort.
Old 03-08-2018, 04:38 PM
  #75  
Jrtaylor9
Rennlist Member
 
Jrtaylor9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: East Hampton / NYC
Posts: 3,810
Received 1,094 Likes on 541 Posts
Default

Same cycle as always:

Car is released, everyone picks it apart, would rather keep some prior gen they already own, cars start being delivered/reviewed, everyone goes nuts and wants one.


Quick Reply: AP on the GT3RS.2 and questions on suspension



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:31 PM.