Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Rohrl: "I bought a Boxster Spyder, because engines like this won’t be made anymore"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-12-2015, 01:22 PM
  #1  
sknandigam
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
sknandigam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SFL
Posts: 142
Received 14 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Rohrl: "I bought a Boxster Spyder, because engines like this won’t be made anymore"

In reference to the 991.2 turbo motors - http://jalopnik.com/real-talk-from-w...911-1685420602

"But no matter how good a turbo engine is, it can never have the pure response of a naturally aspirated engine. This is the reason I bought a Boxster Spyder, because engines like this won't be made anymore."
"At least it's not a four-cylinder turbo like in the next Boxster. That sounds like a Volkswagen Beetle, I'm not kidding you! I tell the guys, 'You're joking with this sound, right?' But they just say they are working on it. I'm sure they will get it right."
Maybe Walter knows something we don't--will the 981 Spyder have a turbo 4? I hope so, because I just bought my 987 and I'm not ready to take a hit yet.
Old 02-13-2015, 05:50 AM
  #2  
Andrew_K
Intermediate
 
Andrew_K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

does he mean a 987? or first in queue for 981?
if he means a 987 does this suggest the 981 is a 4??
Old 02-13-2015, 09:33 AM
  #3  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

Sounds like he owns a 987.2 Spyder. Not surprising! I believe Eduardo had noted in the past that one of the top Porsche family members also has one. They're brilliant cars and not typical for a manufacturer to produce as they throw convenience out the door in favor of experience.

I don't mind Turbo engines but I have to admit the sound and linearity of the Flat 6 is something everyone should experience.
Old 02-13-2015, 11:50 AM
  #4  
Nick B
AutoX
 
Nick B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Am I the only guy in Porschedom who is eagerly anticipating a turbo flat four? After twenty years behind the wheel of Saabs, Volkswagens, and Subarus, I love turbo motors. I love the fuel economy, I love the power, I love the turbo whine and bypass valve noises. I love how they feel unaffected by altitude, and I love how keeping the revs up yields nearly instant power. And over the past 30 years or so, they have become quite reliable.

It seems to me that a turbo would be the motor of choice for rowdier versions of the Boxster.
Old 02-13-2015, 12:22 PM
  #5  
987720
Instructor
 
987720's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nick B
Am I the only guy in Porschedom who is eagerly anticipating a turbo flat four?
Yup you are the only guy
Personally, I prefer NA engines.
Old 02-14-2015, 03:41 PM
  #6  
BBA
Former Vendor
 
BBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Nick B
Am I the only guy in Porschedom who is eagerly anticipating a turbo flat four? After twenty years behind the wheel of Saabs, Volkswagens, and Subarus, I love turbo motors. I love the fuel economy, I love the power, I love the turbo whine and bypass valve noises. I love how they feel unaffected by altitude, and I love how keeping the revs up yields nearly instant power. And over the past 30 years or so, they have become quite reliable.

It seems to me that a turbo would be the motor of choice for rowdier versions of the Boxster.
Not me. The sound and response of the flat-six is what makes a Porsche something special.
Old 02-14-2015, 04:22 PM
  #7  
il pirata
Banned
 
il pirata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: colorado canyons
Posts: 4,078
Received 166 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

The 981 Boxster version of the GT4 will not be be turbo.
Old 02-14-2015, 07:15 PM
  #8  
bigmacsmallfries
Rennlist Member
 
bigmacsmallfries's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 402
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sknandigam
In reference to the 991.2 turbo motors - http://jalopnik.com/real-talk-from-w...911-1685420602





Maybe Walter knows something we don't--will the 981 Spyder have a turbo 4? I hope so, because I just bought my 987 and I'm not ready to take a hit yet.
Originally Posted by Andrew_K
does he mean a 987? or first in queue for 981?
if he means a 987 does this suggest the 981 is a 4??
He's saying he pre-ordered the new '16 Spyder because it will be the very last one without a turbo. Same engine as Carrera S/GT4 almost.
Old 02-14-2015, 07:50 PM
  #9  
the_vetman
Three Wheelin'
 
the_vetman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 1,795
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marine Blue
987.2 Spyder. one of the top Porsche family members also has one.
Wolfgang Porsche
Old 02-14-2015, 08:52 PM
  #10  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bigmacsmallfries
He's saying he pre-ordered the new '16 Spyder because it will be the very last one without a turbo. Same engine as Carrera S/GT4 almost.
Doubt it. Porsche hasn't announced what the next Boxster will be and he said he "bought" it which implies past tense and it's existing.
Old 02-14-2015, 10:30 PM
  #11  
j patterson
Advanced
 
j patterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Trussville, AL
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 987720
Yup you are the only guy
Personally, I prefer NA engines.
Nope, there's one more :-) The torque of a turbo motor at mid rpm is like having an invisible tow vehicle pulling uou along . Whoosh :-)
After a dozen years of an APR tuned Audi, I do miss that.
I'm learning to modify my throttle inputs but it IS very different.
Love how my 987.2 just keeps on accelerating at 6000 + rpm when the little turbo motor was beginning to run out of boost though.
Old 02-14-2015, 10:56 PM
  #12  
BBA
Former Vendor
 
BBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I believe Rohrl has a 987 Spyder. Probably among many other Porsches.....
Old 02-15-2015, 12:18 AM
  #13  
Ferrarisimo
Burning Brakes
 
Ferrarisimo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern California
Posts: 969
Received 60 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nick B
Am I the only guy in Porschedom who is eagerly anticipating a turbo flat four? After twenty years behind the wheel of Saabs, Volkswagens, and Subarus, I love turbo motors. I love the fuel economy, I love the power, I love the turbo whine and bypass valve noises. I love how they feel unaffected by altitude, and I love how keeping the revs up yields nearly instant power. And over the past 30 years or so, they have become quite reliable.

It seems to me that a turbo would be the motor of choice for rowdier versions of the Boxster.
NA all the way, my friend
Old 02-15-2015, 12:01 PM
  #14  
Chris from Cali
Race Car
 
Chris from Cali's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,862
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

While I'm generally in favor of NA engines, the thought of a base Carrera with a turbocharged 3.4L is pretty appealing (esp. since I live at altitude now). I'm still buying a Cayman GT4 though.



Quick Reply: Rohrl: "I bought a Boxster Spyder, because engines like this won’t be made anymore"



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:02 PM.