Cayman Vs Cayman S for the track and autocross
#1
Rennlist Member
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/ranks/veteran_air_force.png)
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Want to preserve my track prepared '83SC so i'm looking for a new toy for mild tracking and autocross. The two contenders are the 2010 Cayman and or the 2010 Cayman S. whichever car would be optioned the same. PDK, Limited slip, Sport bucket seats, factory fire bottle and blue tooth. Yes I would have ot order 18" wheels with the Cayman but in either case the wheels would be replaced with 18" forged wheels (weight and strength.). Yes there is more power in the Cayman S but more weight. While the 3.4 Cayman S engine has direct fuel injection and the 2.9 Cayman engine does not they both have the same oil distribution system which is a great improvement over th first generation. so now i have stated my question and now I look for comments and or darts.
#2
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm sure you are familiar with the features of each model. IMHO you can't go wrong with either one.
Probably not a big factor, but you mentioned AX. One area to consider is what class each car would go into and what the competition is like there.
Also, if it is a dual use car, you might want to consider PASM. It would also be of some advantage in AX if you plan on keeping it stock.
Maybe you should just buy one of each and compare?
Probably not a big factor, but you mentioned AX. One area to consider is what class each car would go into and what the competition is like there.
Also, if it is a dual use car, you might want to consider PASM. It would also be of some advantage in AX if you plan on keeping it stock.
Maybe you should just buy one of each and compare?
#3
Rennlist Member
![](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/ranks/veteran_air_force.png)
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I'm sure you are familiar with the features of each model. IMHO you can't go wrong with either one.
Probably not a big factor, but you mentioned AX. One area to consider is what class each car would go into and what the competition is like there.
Also, if it is a dual use car, you might want to consider PASM. It would also be of some advantage in AX if you plan on keeping it stock.
Maybe you should just buy one of each and compare?
Probably not a big factor, but you mentioned AX. One area to consider is what class each car would go into and what the competition is like there.
Also, if it is a dual use car, you might want to consider PASM. It would also be of some advantage in AX if you plan on keeping it stock.
Maybe you should just buy one of each and compare?