Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

987.1 base cayman or 987.2 base cayman

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2024, 02:38 PM
  #1  
pm77
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
pm77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 25
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default 987.1 base cayman or 987.2 base cayman

Hey folks,

I need some inputs here. I have an option to purchase either a 2007 30K mile 987.1 base (5 spd manual ) or a 2009 987.2 base 80K miles 6 spd manual.

Both are priced at ~ 30K. One is in guards red with a beige interior and the other in grey. They are both single owners.

I was leaning towards the 987.2 as it has more maintenance records but it does have higher mileage.

Any thoughts on the pricing, reliability etc?

I need to close on this in the next couple of days.
Thanks!
Old 05-13-2024, 02:58 PM
  #2  
A432
Rennlist Member
 
A432's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,336
Received 379 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

While the 987.1 base 2.7L engine is fairly reliable, it is still the old architecture M97 with IMS/open block and has noticeably less torque than the larger 9A1 2.9L in the 987.2.
The 987.2 had revised shock and spring rates along with improved power steering cooling and improved oiling which made the car a little better for a DE car.
Because of the reduced production of the 987.2 during the recession, imho it will always be a little more scarce and drive resale a little higher.
Mileage wise, both cars should still be reliable at the 80k mi. point, especially as manual transmissions, but there will be maintenance items coming up, if not done, such as
shift cables, water pump, thermostat, belt, plugs, coils etc. While the lower mileage of the '07 may seem to avoid these, a 17 year old Porsche will potentially need them regardless.
In the end though, they are similar cars so if you really want one color/interior over the other, that might be the largest factor. If no preference, imho take the 987.2 and don't sweat the mileage. (but use in negotiations)
The following 3 users liked this post by A432:
John McM (05-14-2024), pm77 (05-13-2024), Zepper (05-14-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 03:03 PM
  #3  
XuTVJet
Racer
 
XuTVJet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Posts: 265
Received 175 Likes on 97 Posts
Default

Definitely the 987.2 if you can swing it. It's a newer car plus a better and more powerful motor, a stronger gearbox, and overall, a more desirable car. With said, it's a older Porsche. We prepared to do a lot of maintenance and repairs and have $5K+ reserved for the work.
The following 2 users liked this post by XuTVJet:
pm77 (05-13-2024), Zepper (05-14-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 04:22 PM
  #4  
Cemlo
Advanced
 
Cemlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: UK
Posts: 94
Received 28 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

100% gen 2, good luck getting the one you decide, post pics
The following 2 users liked this post by Cemlo:
pm77 (05-13-2024), Zepper (05-14-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 04:39 PM
  #5  
Ric In RVA
Instructor
 
Ric In RVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 108
Received 64 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

I was in the same boat last october. I came to the conclusion I couldn't live with the possible time bomb of Bore score and IMS. Thus 987.2 base manual was my choice.

I didn't realize they were so rare but I truly lucked out.and found one on FB marketplace about 20 mins away from me.

106000 miles and I am seriously enjoying the car.

The following users liked this post:
pm77 (05-13-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 04:52 PM
  #6  
A432
Rennlist Member
 
A432's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,336
Received 379 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ric In RVA
I was in the same boat last october. I came to the conclusion I couldn't live with the possible time bomb of Bore score and IMS. Thus 987.2 base manual was my choice.
Bore scoring and IMS issues on the 2.7L M97 are extremely rare, as in approx. 1%.
Old 05-13-2024, 04:54 PM
  #7  
Ric In RVA
Instructor
 
Ric In RVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 108
Received 64 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A432
Bore scoring and IMS issues on the 2.7L M97 are extremely rare, as in approx. 1%.

I have a pistol that holds 100 rounds in the revolver cylinder. I’m going to spin it once a weekend for the next two years and pointed at you and pull the

You good with that?

I was not.
The following 2 users liked this post by Ric In RVA:
oldbutslow (05-14-2024), Zepper (05-14-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 05:04 PM
  #8  
A432
Rennlist Member
 
A432's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,336
Received 379 Likes on 223 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ric In RVA
I have a pistol that holds 100 rounds in the revolver cylinder. I’m going to spin it once a weekend for the next two years and pointed at you and pull the

You good with that?

I was not.
..........
Old 05-13-2024, 06:45 PM
  #9  
quickboxster
Instructor
 
quickboxster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Posts: 202
Received 107 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by A432
..........
Violence was chosen.
Old 05-13-2024, 07:41 PM
  #10  
pm77
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
pm77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 25
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Thanks for the feedback. I do prefer the slightly updated interiors of the 987.2 as well. It's gone in for a PPI.
The following users liked this post:
A432 (05-13-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 07:51 PM
  #11  
Ric In RVA
Instructor
 
Ric In RVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Posts: 108
Received 64 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by quickboxster
Violence was chosen.

I apologize if anyone is upset.

Probably not the greatest way to make my point but
it’s more of a graphic illustration of the odds always spouted about “the better” IMS.

1 in a 100 is simply not acceptable.

For everyone’s info I follow all four rules of safe fire arm usage and would never point a firearm at anything I didn’t intend to destroy loaded or unloaded.


Old 05-13-2024, 09:35 PM
  #12  
redlightrich
Rennlist Member
 
redlightrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 501
Received 66 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

There are no guarantees with an old car. Yes these are old cars. The 2.7 and 2.9 are super reliable. Either is a safe choice. 1 in a hundred is a great bet on an older car.
I hope you enjoy your .2

Good luck

Rich
The following users liked this post:
pm77 (05-13-2024)
Old 05-13-2024, 09:38 PM
  #13  
old man neri
Drifting
 
old man neri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Newfoundland
Posts: 2,032
Likes: 0
Received 92 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pm77
Thanks for the feedback. I do prefer the slightly updated interiors of the 987.2 as well. It's gone in for a PPI.
Nice. I've got a 987.2 S with 135K mi if it helps. Let us know how the PPI goes.
The following users liked this post:
Bud Fox (05-17-2024)
Old 05-14-2024, 01:40 PM
  #14  
RJ80
Rennlist Member
 
RJ80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Western Washington
Posts: 269
Received 62 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Bore scoring is not an issue whatsoever in 2.7-liter engines, just as it is not in 2.9s. IMS would be the only minor worry. IMS failures are relatively low, but also these cars aren't getting any younger.

I chose a 2.9 for no IMS, slightly more power, significantly improved oiling system (the M97 system is a flawed design), closed-deck block, larger S-spec brakes, 6-speed gearbox and availability of LSD.

You will be more than happy with a good 2.9, they are widely considered to be the most reliable contemporary flat-six Porsche engine. I hope the PPI goes well. Be sure to come back with any concerns when you get the results.
The following users liked this post:
SeanPatrick31 (05-15-2024)
Old 05-14-2024, 05:27 PM
  #15  
pm77
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
pm77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Posts: 25
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RJ80
Bore scoring is not an issue whatsoever in 2.7-liter engines, just as it is not in 2.9s. IMS would be the only minor worry. IMS failures are relatively low, but also these cars aren't getting any younger.

I chose a 2.9 for no IMS, slightly more power, significantly improved oiling system (the M97 system is a flawed design), closed-deck block, larger S-spec brakes, 6-speed gearbox and availability of LSD.

You will be more than happy with a good 2.9, they are widely considered to be the most reliable contemporary flat-six Porsche engine. I hope the PPI goes well. Be sure to come back with any concerns when you get the results.
Hi,
So, I just got the PPI back. Here's a breakdown
- Foggy headlights
-Wiper blades need to be replaced.
-The front tires vibrate while driving.
- Issue with one of the power windows.
- Steering wheel shimmy on free way.
-Many modules have cluster communication codes.
- the idle is uneven - said it could be injector or plugs.

For the codes
- PSM 01 (C140)
- POSIP 02 (C152, C140)
- Front 02
- PCM 04 (C140, C150, C152, C202)
- Steering col switch 01 ( C151 which is a bit strange since this is manual. That's what I was told)

I'm going to chat with my mechanic as well.


Quick Reply: 987.1 base cayman or 987.2 base cayman



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:19 PM.