Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Anybody having problems with the roof "tail" snaps staying put?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2018, 03:10 AM
  #16  
Suicide Jockey
Rennlist Member
 
Suicide Jockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by il pirata
Actually it's been reported before...in fact I think one RL member lost some paint.
I do recall what I think you are referring to: a report by someone incurring paint/body damage as a result of one of the wings flying around loose at speed. But I thought it was unclear in that case if it was due to a failure to properly attach the fin to the rear lid. We know Porsche has felt compelled to come up with a stand-alone supplement to the owners manual instructing owners how to attach the flaps correctly because apparently enough people weren't doing it properly, thus resulting in the wings flapping around at speed and causing damage. I'd call that operator error. Here, however, in DK's case we have a different scenario (at least as I see it - maybe I'm splitting hairs) where a wing which was latched properly and then double-checked to make sure it was latched, just pops loose while the car is at a standstill. That's a different story -- one not involving operator error -- and much harder to figure out given the car was inanimate with wind turbulence a non-contributing factor.
Old 10-30-2018, 01:32 PM
  #17  
digitalrurouni
Pro
 
digitalrurouni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 604
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dazugus
I enjoy doing the open/close dance. The only complaint I have for the 981 Spyder roof is the motor assist. I wish it was fully manual.
Agree, I feel that's not needed at all! And that would probably result in a bit less weight as well :P
Old 10-30-2018, 02:10 PM
  #18  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suicide Jockey
You've made it known time and time again your dislike of the Spyder top and preference for the standard electric top present on other Boxster models.
That's what we all do here on RL -- express opinions and make supporting arguments, often more than once and with more than one poster. Maybe Porsche listens.

Put a regular Boxster auto-top on a Spyder and much of the latter's distinctiveness -- it's unique outward appearance -- is lost.

Put a regular Boxster auto-top on a Spyder and weight savings is also lost.

Put a regular Boxster auto-top on a Spyder and the notion of a "purist" Boxster is also diluted. I don't see how the 981 semi-manual roof is a "contradiction in a purist Boxster," or how adding a full-on automatic roof would make a Spyder more "pure."
The 15lbs saved are irrelevant and unnoticeable. The "tails" are a contradiction in a purist car -- they are added for no other reason than making the car look special/different.

Finally, no need to remove the "tails" and manual top from the Spyder. Just put the 3.8 and LWBs in the GTS and charge $10k less (than the Spyder) to compensate for the loss of "purity". Win-win.
Old 10-30-2018, 05:05 PM
  #19  
Suicide Jockey
Rennlist Member
 
Suicide Jockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Orange County, California
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Received 112 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hf1
The 15lbs saved are irrelevant and unnoticeable.
My understanding from Porsche's info below is that the weight savings is actually 24 lbs.:

Systematic lightweight concept ensures outstanding driving dynamics

The purist features of the Boxster Spyder are the result of a systematic lightweight concept. At 2899 pounds, the Spyder is the lightest model in the current Boxster range, weighing 66 pounds less than a Boxster GTS with manual transmission. The large trunk lid, for instance, is made of aluminum, and the lightweight top with its unheated polymer rear window weighs 24 pounds less than the conventional automatically operated top of other Boxsters. Reduced noise insulation also lowers the vehicle's overall weight. The results are clearly noticeable to the driver. This car's center of gravity is lower than that of any other Boxster, and its power-to-weight ratio has been improved to 7.7 pounds per hp. This makes the Boxster Spyder handle particularly nimbly, yet it accelerates as vehemently as a high-performance sports car.


I was going to say that in isolation 24 lbs. may not seem like much, but actually 24 lbs. is a pretty hefty amount. Try adding a 25 lbs. to your normal bench press and you'll find out pretty quick! LOL Joking aside, in isolation is not how weight savings should be viewed. Engineers scrape and claw to shave 1 lb. off part X, 4 lbs. off part Y, maybe 10 lbs. off part Z. It all adds up and each pound saved is important. If you take the attitude that a few lbs. saved on this part or that really isn't worth the effort, then at the end of the day you end up with a seriously bloated car. So I would hesitate to characterize a 24 lb. savings as "irrelevant."

Originally Posted by hf1
The "tails" are a contradiction in a purist car -- they are added for no other reason than making the car look special/different.
I would normally ask how making a car look special/different (while also shaving 24 lbs.) is a bad thing, but I get your point. Form is not exactly following function.
Old 10-30-2018, 06:26 PM
  #20  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suicide Jockey
My understanding from Porsche's info below is that the weight savings is actually 24 lbs.:

Systematic lightweight concept ensures outstanding driving dynamics

The purist features of the Boxster Spyder are the result of a systematic lightweight concept. At 2899 pounds, the Spyder is the lightest model in the current Boxster range, weighing 66 pounds less than a Boxster GTS with manual transmission.
Most of that 66lbs comes from the LWBs which aren't available in the S/GTS. Not sure if radio/AC delete were options on the 981 Spyder. If yes, they too would contribute in the difference since they were not available in the S/GTS.

The large trunk lid, for instance, is made of aluminum,
Don't have the data but, to me, the Spyder's longer humped aluminum trunk lid looks heftier (much more substantial) than the much smaller standard lid.

I was going to say that in isolation 24 lbs. may not seem like much, but actually 24 lbs. is a pretty hefty amount. Try adding a 25 lbs. to your normal bench press and you'll find out pretty quick! LOL Joking aside, in isolation is not how weight savings should be viewed. Engineers scrape and claw to shave 1 lb. off part X, 4 lbs. off part Y, maybe 10 lbs. off part Z. It all adds up and each pound saved is important. If you take the attitude that a few lbs. saved on this part or that really isn't worth the effort, then at the end of the day you end up with a seriously bloated car. So I would hesitate to characterize a 24 lb. savings as "irrelevant."
24lbs is less than 4 gallons of gas. Personally, I'd drive with 4 extra gallons in the tank in return for a top that I could open and close without stopping. More power to you if you can sense a 24 lb weight diff in your cars. Again, I have no problem with the Spyder. I only wish that the same performance package was also offered with an auto-top under a different model designation.



Quick Reply: Anybody having problems with the roof "tail" snaps staying put?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:35 PM.