Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Thickest Wheel Spacers for 987 Boxster S?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-16-2015, 11:02 PM
  #16  
Spokayman
Rennlist Member
 
Spokayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Southern Arizona
Posts: 1,384
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Gary R.
Are the stock lugs long enough to be safe with 10-20mm spacers added? I see ECS sells with or without (I assume longer?) Lug bolts..
I'm thinking 10mm front, 18mm rear would be about perfect.
No, stock wheel bolts cannot be used with spacers any thicker than (I think) 3MM.
I bought my new lug bolts in a kit along with the spacers from ECS.
Old 05-16-2015, 11:10 PM
  #17  
RBatsch
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
RBatsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 47
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

No, stock bolts are too short so get the spacers that come with the bolts. 10/18 would work nice but IMO, 12/20 would be perfect.
Old 05-17-2015, 06:16 AM
  #18  
zadar
Instructor
 
zadar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You can get studs and use any size spacers.
Old 05-17-2015, 11:06 AM
  #19  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,600
Received 290 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Thanks, I assumed that and will be sure to buy the proper sets when the time comes...
Old 05-18-2015, 10:08 AM
  #20  
ECS Tuning
Former Vendor
 
ECS Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Wadsworth, OH
Posts: 5,626
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RBatsch
My thoughts exactly...but I wasn't going to modify this car!!! Now why would you go and put that bug in my ear? I also 'need' a better exhaust, plenum...STOP!

Any recommendations on lowering springs?
We've got H&R springs on our 996 and I really like the stance. The quality is also second to none.
Old 05-18-2015, 11:40 AM
  #21  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,600
Received 290 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ECS Tuning
We've got H&R springs on our 996 and I really like the stance. The quality is also second to none.
Paul - those H&R's good for non PASM PDK cars? I ask because some of them specify..
Old 05-18-2015, 12:36 PM
  #22  
ECS Tuning
Former Vendor
 
ECS Tuning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Wadsworth, OH
Posts: 5,626
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

The 981 springs will work with PASM and PDK. They don't lower the car a full inch because you're already starting out a little lower than a non-PASM car, but there are no issues with using them on a PASM car.
Old 05-18-2015, 03:29 PM
  #23  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,600
Received 290 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ECS Tuning
The 981 springs will work with PASM and PDK. They don't lower the car a full inch because you're already starting out a little lower than a non-PASM car, but there are no issues with using them on a PASM car.
My car is non-PASM AFAIK, it looks like it's at Rally height right now.. and that's with 19" wheels!
Attached Images  
Old 05-23-2015, 10:31 AM
  #24  
SBD
Track Day
 
SBD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Just an FYI. Although the look is much better with running for example a 5-7mm front and 15-20mm rear spacer you are actually inducing understeer. (your actually adding more to the stock mild understeer already set from factory. For better handling on stock tires size or (proportions sizes equal to stock ) the set up you actually want is 5-7mm wider in the front. So for best handling add a 5-7mm upfront and nothing on the rear. Handling or looks its a trade off. There are ways to get both. Simplest is to run a wider tire up front 255-265 no spacer. There are many ways with after market suspensions to correct too.
Old 05-23-2015, 11:00 AM
  #25  
Gary R.
Rennlist Member
 
Gary R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Valencia, Spain
Posts: 15,600
Received 290 Likes on 172 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SBD
Just an FYI. Although the look is much better with running for example a 5-7mm front and 15-20mm rear spacer you are actually inducing understeer. (your actually adding more to the stock mild understeer already set from factory. For better handling on stock tires size or (proportions sizes equal to stock ) the set up you actually want is 5-7mm wider in the front. So for best handling add a 5-7mm upfront and nothing on the rear. Handling or looks its a trade off. There are ways to get both. Simplest is to run a wider tire up front 255-265 no spacer. There are many ways with after market suspensions to correct too.
Wouldn't a proper alignment rectify this?
Old 05-25-2015, 03:19 PM
  #26  
RBatsch
Intermediate
Thread Starter
 
RBatsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 47
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

SBD, what do you think of Gary's idea? I can't say that I've really noticed that I've introduced more understeer and maybe I'd only notice in extreme cases such as on a track? Then again, I come from SAABs, cars known for their extreme understeer...
Old 06-08-2015, 03:11 AM
  #27  
SBD
Track Day
 
SBD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Proper alignment - not going to help the push. The standard track autox set up is max camber up front (about .75 average) then add plus one degree (1.75) at rear. Then zero toe front and rear with slight toe out to get a light rotation help. Some folks like a slight toe out for autox too. Max front castor In addition, you should have your alignment checked as the cars vary from the factory and the cars are quite sensitive to alignment settings.
Old 06-08-2015, 06:49 AM
  #28  
sjfehr
Drifting
 
sjfehr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,029
Received 66 Likes on 56 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SBD
Proper alignment - not going to help the push. The standard track autox set up is max camber up front (about .75 average) then add plus one degree (1.75) at rear. Then zero toe front and rear with slight toe out to get a light rotation help. Some folks like a slight toe out for autox too. Max front castor In addition, you should have your alignment checked as the cars vary from the factory and the cars are quite sensitive to alignment settings.
I disagree on rear toe out- you want rear toe in. My 987.2S didn't need any help to rotate; adding negative toe in the rear and a GT3 front swaybar helped to make the rotation a lot more controllable. I've been running 255/35-18 front and 275/35-18 rear Dunlop ZII & ZII*. About to mount the same size Bridgestone RE-71R. I'm a bit concerned I may need spacers because the RE-71R are such a wide tire (about 1" more tread than the ZII of the same size). Looks are low on my priority list, but I have a feeling I'm going to inadvertently achieve the look the OP wants until it's all said and done.

Anyone have experience with the $139 7mm spacer kit from Suncoast? http://www.suncoastparts.com/product/SPA7MM.html



Quick Reply: Thickest Wheel Spacers for 987 Boxster S?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:55 AM.