Notices
968 Forum 1992-1995

SFR supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2012, 09:06 PM
  #31  
odb812
Burning Brakes
 
odb812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Rafael, CA
Posts: 951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SpeedBump
You guys seem to have missed or forgotten the reason he was looking at an existing kit.
Good call, Mark. I must have overlooked that. I just assume that when people look to go forced induction on a high compression N/A motor, they plan on doing some tinkering.

Originally Posted by 944forever
odb812:

Are you sure?

I thought the 951 motor is the most desirable - and hence the most expensive - of all the motors offered for the 924/931/944/951/968 series. Have seen a few 951 motors swapped into 968s, but never seen a 968 motor swapped into a 951.

MN
I've never been more sure of anything in my life. You can find running 951 motors all day for under a grand. A bare 968 block will get you at least $700 and you can probably get close to that for the crank as well. Most of the equation here is due to availability and the other part to turbo guys who wanted to build 3l motors(prior to the word getting out about MID sleeving).

As far as what motor is more desirable, the 968 motor has a ton of R&D in it. I forget where I read the article about all the changes made from the s2 to the 968 motor, but it was a great read. It is the better motor from the factory. The 951 motor has more potential with simple bolt-on modifications.
Old 03-08-2012, 03:12 AM
  #32  
Dubai944
Rennlist Member
 
Dubai944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia
Posts: 813
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Yes, I think I already made the point that supercharging a 968 engine with any kit pretty much equals tinkering and reduced reliability. Same goes for any engine swap.

If you want stock like reliability, stay stock. If you want a bit more power with a stock 968 engine, a set of headers, cams and a bit of tuning can wake up a stock NA 968 nicely, without the inevitable project work that comes from getting forced induction to run, turbo or supercharger.
Old 03-08-2012, 09:18 AM
  #33  
majsc
Rennlist Member
 
majsc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A little of topic, but at what point do the stock internals become suspect on a 968 engine?
Old 03-08-2012, 10:30 AM
  #34  
odurandina
Team Owner
 
odurandina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: one thousand, five hundred miles north of Ft. Lauderdale for the summer.
Posts: 28,705
Received 212 Likes on 153 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dubai944

Same goes for any engine swap.

i must respectfully disagree.

there is not 1 part of the LSx puzzle that has not been solved to near normal GM reliability.

and GM LSx reliability is very good.



oil pan/crossmember - solved.

motor mount reliability - solved.

serpentine/engine compartment spacing - solved.

cooling - solved.

cooling fan operation - solved.

oil cooling - solved.

ac - solved.

ps - solved.

full power braking - solved.

anti-lock braking - no issues.

intake/throttle body clearance - solved.

front A-arms spacing - solved.

bellhousing adaptor spacing/fitment - solved.

clutch issues - solved.

low-quality oem driveshaft - solved.

short gears/final drive ratio - solved.

reduced cv joint life - solved.

all dash instrumentation - solved.



compare to Porsche/oem. the Porsche 944 engine is decent... the semi-exotic nature of the maintenance schedule/cost vs performance, is extremely difficult to justify... 944 engine support components falls somewhere between poor~extremely poor....... the 968 engine is superb... the semi-exotic nature of the maintenance schedule/cost vs performance is pricey. engine support components/reliabilty; fair.
Old 03-08-2012, 10:37 AM
  #35  
Dubai944
Rennlist Member
 
Dubai944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia
Posts: 813
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

You miss my point. I love the V8 swap. I can see it has been well thought out for this car. I love engine swaps in general and have done several on various cars. I am seriously looking at it for my car if the classes of racing suit in Australia.

What I think though, is that any person who doesn't like tinkering, is worried about getting involved in R&D or having to figure out non standard solutions and is worried about stock reliability as priorities is probably not the best candidate to be doing any type of engine swap, supercharger kit install or turbo modification. I doubt they will enjoy the process much, that's all.

The problem I see with supercharger kits in general is the impression given that it is just a bolt on solution, like bolting on a set of headers. It just isn't that simple in most cases.

Last edited by Dubai944; 03-08-2012 at 10:58 AM.
Old 03-08-2012, 12:06 PM
  #36  
Jfrahm
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jfrahm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 6,496
Likes: 0
Received 125 Likes on 111 Posts
Default

As far as the 968 internals, the early rods are suspect at stock power levels. The later rods seem pretty good. Search on 1r and 2r rods and you will read about this issue.

The short piston skirts IMO are not great for boost. The may be less of an issue in the 968 with the oil squirters than it is in the S2. Bore scuffing is a worry due to a lack of good skirt support.

Whatever is done, RPMs and knock need to be kept in check, particularly under boost. Tip-in detonation is also a concern I have and I am working on a way to slow the boost hit as I think on a hot day this can be a very dangerous condition. The problem there is that at cruise with light throttle the supercharger is ready to deliver boost but the ECU is in economy cruise mode with lots of timing dialed in. Unlike a turbo, boost does not build slowly but hits once the throttle plate opens and the recirculation valve closes. The ECU might get the WOT signal but not before the boost comes roaring in and meets all that timing. Particularly bad news on a hot day.

-Joel.
Old 03-08-2012, 05:16 PM
  #37  
Eric_Oz_S2
Three Wheelin'
 
Eric_Oz_S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jfrahm
As far as the 968 internals, the early rods are suspect at stock power levels. The later rods seem pretty good. Search on 1r and 2r rods and you will read about this issue.

The short piston skirts IMO are not great for boost. The may be less of an issue in the 968 with the oil squirters than it is in the S2. Bore scuffing is a worry due to a lack of good skirt support.

Whatever is done, RPMs and knock need to be kept in check, particularly under boost. Tip-in detonation is also a concern I have and I am working on a way to slow the boost hit as I think on a hot day this can be a very dangerous condition. The problem there is that at cruise with light throttle the supercharger is ready to deliver boost but the ECU is in economy cruise mode with lots of timing dialed in. Unlike a turbo, boost does not build slowly but hits once the throttle plate opens and the recirculation valve closes. The ECU might get the WOT signal but not before the boost comes roaring in and meets all that timing. Particularly bad news on a hot day.

-Joel.
Joel,

To help with this I run the open loop PT on the track. This lets me run richer than 14.7:1 in PT before transitioning to WOT fuel. In effect in PT I have around 12.5:1 in the higher load/rpm areas of the map. I have also retarded the WOT ignition as well as retarded the high RPM and high load cells in the PT ignition maps.
Old 03-09-2012, 01:51 AM
  #38  
Dubai944
Rennlist Member
 
Dubai944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia
Posts: 813
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

^^ This is called "tinkering"... lol
Old 03-09-2012, 02:01 AM
  #39  
Eric_Oz_S2
Three Wheelin'
 
Eric_Oz_S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Yep - and I was under no illusions that it would be straightforward (especially since I built up my installation from scratch). BUT, I actually found the tuning easier than expected.
Old 03-09-2012, 04:13 AM
  #40  
MN
Racer
 
MN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Palm Beach, FL / Hamburg, DE
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

What I think though, is that any person who doesn't like tinkering, is worried about getting involved in R&D or having to figure out non standard solutions and is worried about stock reliability as priorities is probably not the best candidate to be doing any type of engine swap, supercharger kit install or turbo modification. I doubt they will enjoy the process much, that's all.
Dubai944:

Perhaps we both overstate our case.

The 968 motor didn't get by itself into my 944NA. However, not much tinkering was necessary to install; once installed, no tinkering since and behaves and feels like stock. (Well, O.K., because in a way it is stock!). Especially the jump in torque must have added a lot stress to the drivetrain, but after 10 years and 50 000 miles plus no problems.

I see no reason why a well sorted, low-boost supercharger kit - IF used within the design parameters - should be much different or must be an ongoing R&D project.

Of course, once moving into high-boost it becomes a completely different story moving out the realm of just installing a kit adding a supercharger. My understanding is to do it right requires rebuilding the engine for boost (low compression and suitable head gasket), redo the belt drive system, and in-depth reconsideration of engine management.

MN

Last edited by MN; 03-09-2012 at 05:19 AM.
Old 03-09-2012, 11:21 AM
  #41  
Dubai944
Rennlist Member
 
Dubai944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia
Posts: 813
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Well go for it then

Originally Posted by 944forever
I see no reason why a well sorted, low-boost supercharger kit - IF used within the design parameters - should be much different or must be an ongoing R&D project.
True, but the "well sorted" part will be the job you have to do yourself.
Old 03-09-2012, 05:17 PM
  #42  
savvas944
Instructor
 
savvas944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: bahrain
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dubai 944,are you still racing the car in Dubai?
I am racing a n/a manual 968 wide body in Bahrain,soon to be s/c
Drop me an email if you want to exchange ideas.
Old 03-09-2012, 05:45 PM
  #43  
Dubai944
Rennlist Member
 
Dubai944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sunshine Coast, Australia
Posts: 813
Received 12 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

No, I have just moved home to Australia and the car is there now. Happy to swap ideas if you like. Just pm me any time.
Old 03-11-2012, 07:13 PM
  #44  
MN
Racer
 
MN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Palm Beach, FL / Hamburg, DE
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

True, but the "well sorted" part will be the job you have to do yourself.
Not necessarily, there seems to be a consensus that the Design1Racing kit is, or is getting close to being ″well sorted″. In contrast, the 928motorsport kit seems to need more work, but a next generation version is apparently just around the corner.

Wished that more supercharger users would chip in.

MN



Quick Reply: SFR supercharger



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:16 PM.