Notices
968 Forum 1992-1995

New High Performance Head Gasket for 968, 944S2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-12-2010, 06:46 PM
  #1  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default New High Performance Head Gasket for 968, 944S2

When I began developing the supercharger kit for the 968, I had several responses that the 968 suffered from weak head gaskets.

I have been supercharging the 928 for 10 years now, and the 968/944 head gaskets were designed using the same materials and basic design from the 928, so I had a headstart on the problem.

About a year ago we developed a line of modern head gaskets for the 928 and they have proven themselves very well. These use more modern materials (graphite-composite steel) and methods than the old paper-laminate OEM head gaskets.

I have just completed the design of the matching 968 head gaskets in GCS (graphite-composite steel) and I have a few of them in stock now, more on the way.

They will fit all 968 and 944S2's with 104mm bore.

In testing, we have run these gaskets up to 14 psi of boost on a 928 without a failure.

They also have a silicone outer sealant sprayed on them that really helps seal heads or decks that have a little corrosion on them. And a stronger fire ring than stock to handle boost pressures.

More pictures and information are available here:
http://www.928motorsports.com/parts/gcs_head_gasket.php

I dont want to start people worrying that they have to replace their headgaskets to install our supercharger kit - you dont. But, for those with trouble sealing their heads or taking our supercharger kit racing.... its nice to know there is an upgrade now available.
Attached Images    
Old 08-12-2010, 10:14 PM
  #2  
Damian in NJ
Race Director
 
Damian in NJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 10,195
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Beautiful, Carl.
Old 08-12-2010, 10:20 PM
  #3  
Lemming
Nordschleife Master
 
Lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Altered States of America (B'ham)
Posts: 6,426
Received 86 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Any plans to make a thicker one for those of us with shaved heads?
Attached Images  
Old 08-13-2010, 10:05 AM
  #4  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

According to our measurements, the firering on the stock headgasket is 0.060". Our gasket is 0.065", so this is slightly thicker than stock.

No plans to make any other at this time, until I see how these sell. The tooling for this part was expensive.
Old 08-15-2010, 06:09 PM
  #5  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,917
Received 96 Likes on 79 Posts
Default

Actually you'd probably sell a lot more if you made one for the modded 2.5 turbo crowd. There are lots of these guys running more than 20psi and the h/g is a weak link. Obviously there are alternatives to the stock h/g available.
Without bashing another brand, how do you see these as different from the other aftermarket products?
Old 08-15-2010, 06:58 PM
  #6  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Actually you'd probably sell a lot more if you made one for the modded 2.5 turbo crowd. There are lots of these guys running more than 20psi and the h/g is a weak link.
+1
Old 08-15-2010, 07:03 PM
  #7  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 534 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

I'd try the 104 version on my turbo but would need widefire and ability to run with o-ringed block.
Old 08-16-2010, 06:34 AM
  #8  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

This HG would be a straight fit on my turbo... but you haven't tested it over 14psi?
Old 08-16-2010, 10:35 AM
  #9  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

From our webpage: http://www.928motorsports.com/parts/gcs_head_gasket.php

No O-rings Required: These head gaskets do not require O-rings and cannot be used with O-rings. The stainless steel armor/combustion seal w/contained copper wire rings is especially good at sealing low-boost assisted applications.
Old 08-16-2010, 10:43 AM
  #10  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Without bashing another brand, how do you see these as different from the other aftermarket products?
I presume your are talking about a multi-layer-steel head gasket like the Cometic brand. I am a Cometic dealer, so I can speak about that accurately.
I have sold, installed and used MLS head gaskets.

They are good, and they work, but they require extra care. Because they have very little yield, the head and the deck have to be very near perfect. Milling the head is common, but decking the block may also be necessary or they willnot seal.

Secondly, they require a re-torque of the head after 3 heat cycles. This is no fun on OHV engines should the camshaft or cam cradle shroud the head bolts. On a 928, its a real PITA. However, without retorquing, the probablility of a coolant leak is very high.

These GCS are different from MLS in these ways: the head and deck need only be reasonably good, as if you were installing an OEM gasket. In fact, the GCS gasket will even seal small corrosion pockmarks in the aluminum on both sides.

And there is no need to retorque these headgaskets after installation. Which makes for an easier installation.

Neither the MLS nor the GCS head gasket is compatible with stainless steel o-rings.
Old 08-16-2010, 10:47 AM
  #11  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

This HG would be a straight fit on my turbo... but you haven't tested it over 14psi?
We did not design this for use on the 951 and I have not advertised it as such. It is a brand new product, so no, nobody yet has taken it above 14 psi. Im sure that will happen, but it hasnt happened yet.

For the intended application (968 and 944S2 with our supercharger kits) and 968 and 944S2 NA with head gaskets sealing problems, 14 psi is a great plenty.
Old 08-16-2010, 11:05 AM
  #12  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Should there be any physical difference to a HG between a SC and turbo application? Both involve sending pressurised air into the cylinders?
Old 08-16-2010, 11:33 AM
  #13  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Measured in cylinder pressure, no. Turbo or SC would be the same at this level on this part.

Not being a 951 expert - what boost levels do a stock 951 produce? And a modded 951?

Last edited by Carl Fausett; 08-16-2010 at 01:17 PM.
Old 08-16-2010, 11:54 AM
  #14  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

A stock 951 (2.5L -> 100mm bore) runs 10-11psi.

FWIW I run a stock 104mm bore headgasket on my 3.0 turbo at 15psi, it hasn't blown up (yet) and doesn't seem it will blow up if I keep the boost that low. I suppose I will go as far as 20psi when I switch to E85. Several people who use the stock 100mm turbo HG seem to be running 20psi on pump gas without issues.
Old 08-16-2010, 01:16 PM
  #15  
Carl Fausett
Developer
Thread Starter
 
Carl Fausett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Horicon, WI
Posts: 7,005
Likes: 0
Received 60 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Ok, then it would appear that this gasket would satisfy the stock 951 if all the other coolant and oiling passages are the same.

What worries me is the Porsche PET part numbers for the 951 and 944 NA head gaskets are more than just a revision different... the entire sub-series is different between the two, suggesting more than a minor difference. I do not have a 951 block/head here to mount them up to.

Do 944 owners use 968 head gaskets commonly?


Quick Reply: New High Performance Head Gasket for 968, 944S2



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:16 AM.