Notices
964 Turbo Forum 1989-1994

3.3 vs 3.6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-10-2011, 08:46 PM
  #16  
SA Mike
Thank You
Rennlist Member
 
SA Mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Texas - it's a whole nuther country
Posts: 2,278
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eyue
Normally, a good 3.3 is as good as a 3.6!
It is, the differences are close. I think Car and Driver rated the 3.6 at 4 sec. 0-60 an the 3.3 wasnt far behind at 4.4 or something like that. I have speedlines on mine and it looks just like a 3.6 except for the badging and red calipers

Last edited by SA Mike; 12-10-2011 at 09:00 PM. Reason: spelling
Old 12-10-2011, 10:10 PM
  #17  
John McM
Rennlist Member
 
John McM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand.
Posts: 13,304
Received 647 Likes on 375 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bklyn964Turbo
most enthusiasts could care less that it was featured in a movie...now the actual car itself that was in that movie will be worth more....Bad Boys 2 featured Will Smith in a Ferrari and I can assure you that one isn't going to make any collector's wish list unless it was the actual one he drove and then that is more about American culture being obsessed with celebrities and what they wear, do, drive and eat...me personally...could give a rats *** about celebrity paraphernalia.

Long live the 3.3!
I certainly didn't buy mine because it was in a movie. In fact I happened across my car while looking for a 964. I didnt know what it was.

That said i had read a lot of magazines and other media on Porsches, to the point where some models had raised values in my mind just through reinforcement of what people were saying. The '72 RS is a classic example. Equally, all early 964s were potential leakers with DMFs and distributors about to fail.

Take it for what it is, but positive media exposure has a bearing on demand, particularly people looking for a weekend toy (in NZ at least the cars seem to be barely used by their current owners, neither are they coming up for sale).

Enjoy your car in good health. Just recognize it will never be an investment as neither are the Turbo 3.6s. I've had mine for 10 years and it's not close to breaking even.
Old 12-10-2011, 11:57 PM
  #18  
Metal Guru
Rennlist Member
 
Metal Guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, Mi.
Posts: 4,521
Received 431 Likes on 311 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by John McM
Just recognize it will never be an investment as neither are the Turbo 3.6s. I've had mine for 10 years and it's not close to breaking even.
Aye
Old 12-11-2011, 04:35 AM
  #19  
Max964t36
Racer
 
Max964t36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 493
Received 101 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

There are HUGE differences between ROW 3.6 and 3.3. Taking aside the engine, the main point in favor of the 3.6 it's the improved overall high speed handling due to completely new suspensions. I guess that in the US u don't feel that since the US 3.6 and 3.3 basically share the same suspensions.
Old 12-11-2011, 05:20 AM
  #20  
turboholic
Racer
 
turboholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Stuttgart Zuffenhausen
Posts: 309
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Does anybody know what happened to Dave´s website inyourfacegauges.com? Is he still in business? He is a very good guy, I sent my stock tach to him a couple of years ago and he modified it.
Old 12-11-2011, 09:59 AM
  #21  
Metal Guru
Rennlist Member
 
Metal Guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, Mi.
Posts: 4,521
Received 431 Likes on 311 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Max964t36
There are HUGE differences between ROW 3.6 and 3.3. Taking aside the engine, the main point in favor of the 3.6 it's the improved overall high speed handling due to completely new suspensions.
Completely new? Minor revision would be a better description and only at the rear to address a tire wear concern but in case I'm wrong please elaborate.

Really, the 3.6 was mostly a marketing exercise. When the 964 Turbo was introduced the auto critics didn't hide their disappointment that it had the carry-over 930 engine instead of the 3.6. So the 3.6 was created to keep sales up until the 993 Turbo was ready.
All in all I'd still love to have one.
Old 12-11-2011, 11:18 AM
  #22  
Max964t36
Racer
 
Max964t36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 493
Received 101 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

... but in case I'm wrong please elaborate.
Well, I don't say you're wrong, but maybe I wouldn't call "minor" the fact that the ROW 3.6 rear suspension had upgraded components, that the front and rear springs and the rear shock absorbers where different...

That said, I think that you should seriouly try both ROW 3.6 and 3.3 ... that would speak by itself
Old 12-11-2011, 12:39 PM
  #23  
Metal Guru
Rennlist Member
 
Metal Guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, Mi.
Posts: 4,521
Received 431 Likes on 311 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Max964t36
That said, I think that you should seriously try both ROW 3.6 and 3.3 ... that would speak by itself
We won't be getting ROW cars over here for a few years yet thanks to the gray market import laws and I have no trips to Europe planned in the near future (unfortunately). So, sir, I will have to rely on you to describe the differences
Old 12-11-2011, 12:46 PM
  #24  
eyue
Racer
 
eyue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Other than the bumper guard and ride height , I only know that 5hp less for US Spec compare to ROW !
Old 12-11-2011, 01:26 PM
  #25  
Max964t36
Racer
 
Max964t36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 493
Received 101 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

I only know that 5hp less for US Spec compare to ROW !
The 3.6 turbo engines are the same on the 2 sides of the Ocean, the mismatch figure is only due to the different homologation procedures.
Old 12-11-2011, 01:32 PM
  #26  
eyue
Racer
 
eyue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I thought is due to the difference in emission control.....
Old 12-11-2011, 02:04 PM
  #27  
Max964t36
Racer
 
Max964t36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Europe
Posts: 493
Received 101 Likes on 43 Posts
Default

I will have to rely on you to describe the differences
That's very nice of you but hopefully I won't bear this responsibility alone ... I'm pretty sure there are many plus or minus experienced people with a number of different ideas on this subject
Old 12-11-2011, 06:05 PM
  #28  
Metal Guru
Rennlist Member
 
Metal Guru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, Mi.
Posts: 4,521
Received 431 Likes on 311 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eyue
I thought is due to the difference in emission control.....
It's the difference between the calculation of European hp and SAE hp.
Old 12-11-2011, 10:49 PM
  #29  
Sifly
Instructor
 
Sifly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I didn't buy my car to go fast! A newish Impreza would probably leave any 964 for dead on a country lane. I bought it for its classic looks and air-cooled personality, something which both the 3.3 and 3.6 have by the bucket load.

I have a mate with the 3.6, it's a fantastic car, but to be honest, I find the lack of sports seats in it the biggest difference when on the road! Me, I decided on a nice 3.3 (sports seats a must) and kept the additional £20k in the bank. Each to their own I guess?

Enjoy the hunt

Here she is next to my brother in laws 996 t, if you want a 'FAST' Porsche, look no further (and can be cheaper than a good 965 too)......................


Last edited by Sifly; 12-11-2011 at 11:10 PM.
Old 12-12-2011, 01:52 AM
  #30  
agent325
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
agent325's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,369
Received 29 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I had a friends 3.6 turbo for the past month, as I helped facilitate the sale of the car for him. I fell in love with it. I think somewhere down the road, I will purchase a 964 Turbo, propabably a 3.6.

You will pay a 20 grand premiem, but its money well spent. My friend bought his 3.6 in 2002 with 40K miles and sold it last month for exactly the same price with 64K miles.


Quick Reply: 3.3 vs 3.6



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:54 AM.