Timing Chain Boxes - Aluminum Model?
#1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Timing Chain Boxes - Aluminum Model?
While on the topic of leaks and magnesium versus aluminum...
I'm hearing that mag timing chain boxes have a high potential for warping, and leaking. Reportedly there are aluminum versions available.
Is this really a concern? I have not heard of this before, or seen people using those alu parts on a 964.
Are the aluminum units from a 993? Part numbers?
I guess the timing covers are aluminum too?
Finally, not that they are the "end all" to engine discussion (Singer), but these timing boxes they are using are magnesium....
Would love to hear from other engine builders !!!
TIA,
R.
I'm hearing that mag timing chain boxes have a high potential for warping, and leaking. Reportedly there are aluminum versions available.
Is this really a concern? I have not heard of this before, or seen people using those alu parts on a 964.
Are the aluminum units from a 993? Part numbers?
I guess the timing covers are aluminum too?
Finally, not that they are the "end all" to engine discussion (Singer), but these timing boxes they are using are magnesium....
Would love to hear from other engine builders !!!
TIA,
R.
Last edited by Super90; 04-11-2017 at 12:37 PM.
#2
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Additional info. The following part numbers are reported to be for aluminum chain boxes
993.105.093.05 aluminum left box
964.105.094.04 aluminum right box
993.105.093.05 aluminum left box
964.105.094.04 aluminum right box
Last edited by Super90; 04-11-2017 at 11:29 AM.
#3
Rennlist Member
This is my third thread today on Magnesium.
I don't see anything in the TSB's suggesting there was a problem. As I said with other mag parts I highly doubt that the mag is warping. If properly cast and heat treated it will have the same strength as an aluminum cast counterpart. Mag will dissipate heat faster than aluminum also. Once in heat treated condition it is very hard to get mag to move without breaking it and would take considerable force to do so.
I see a lot of leaking timing chain covers but not too many leaking between the case and the housing. I have found that in some cases when they were leaking the nuts were not to factory torque specifications. Applying the appropriate torque seemed to eliminate the problem without replacing the gasket. The other issue is the cam seal leaking. Odds of or the need to spend the money on aluminum housings and covers IMO doesn't seem warranted. Although if you want the piece of mind any new part will be more of a guarantee than reusing the old be it mag or aluminum.
The only issue I have seen with these housings are the gasket is stuck in place and has bonded with the magnesium. When you remove the gasket it will leave small voids that could allow oil to leak by. I just did one for a friend and so far no leaks despite the pitting of the casting surface.
Do you know what year they switched to the aluminum housings. My 96 Vram 993 engine has the mag ones.
BTW the ones pictured appear to be mag.
I don't see anything in the TSB's suggesting there was a problem. As I said with other mag parts I highly doubt that the mag is warping. If properly cast and heat treated it will have the same strength as an aluminum cast counterpart. Mag will dissipate heat faster than aluminum also. Once in heat treated condition it is very hard to get mag to move without breaking it and would take considerable force to do so.
I see a lot of leaking timing chain covers but not too many leaking between the case and the housing. I have found that in some cases when they were leaking the nuts were not to factory torque specifications. Applying the appropriate torque seemed to eliminate the problem without replacing the gasket. The other issue is the cam seal leaking. Odds of or the need to spend the money on aluminum housings and covers IMO doesn't seem warranted. Although if you want the piece of mind any new part will be more of a guarantee than reusing the old be it mag or aluminum.
The only issue I have seen with these housings are the gasket is stuck in place and has bonded with the magnesium. When you remove the gasket it will leave small voids that could allow oil to leak by. I just did one for a friend and so far no leaks despite the pitting of the casting surface.
Do you know what year they switched to the aluminum housings. My 96 Vram 993 engine has the mag ones.
BTW the ones pictured appear to be mag.
#4
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Thanks Anthony!
Appreciate your experience on this. That's exactly what we are seeking. Is this as real an issue as, say, the mag valve covers? What is the "failure rate" so to speak ?
Hoping to gather more impirical data...
Appreciate your experience on this. That's exactly what we are seeking. Is this as real an issue as, say, the mag valve covers? What is the "failure rate" so to speak ?
Hoping to gather more impirical data...
#5
Rennlist Member
Another point to be considered. If an instance of warped housings is discovered it would be good to note if the engine was run extensively without its heat shields. I always kept mine on the back since I ran a muffler across the back. I removed them from the sides since I have the heat shield by the cat and I am also running a smaller less restrictive unit on one side and nothing on the other. Although they didn't use heat shields on turbos.
Last edit:
I see the mag part is still available. I would assume if it were a problem it would have been superseded with the aluminum part. Interestingly the aluminum part is more expensive than the mag part made from same tooling. Mag is more expensive to produce as well.
Last edited by cobalt; 04-10-2017 at 05:03 PM.
#6
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
Colin, Steve W., et al, would be interested in your experiences on this....
I'm going to replace the gaskets/o-rings where the boxes meet the case and cams and wondering if I should consider the alu parts.
I'm going to replace the gaskets/o-rings where the boxes meet the case and cams and wondering if I should consider the alu parts.
#7
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Those are the part numbers for the magnesium chain boxes. Do you have any pictures of the aluminum boxes?
Trending Topics
#9
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
A few people have posted that the magnesium cooling fans coming from PAG are now made of aluminum, I wonder if this is more of the same? The part numbers you posted were in-use prior to the end of the 993 production (they show as dropped/replaced in a 1998 PET) when they were still magnesium. It would be interesting to see what the casting date is on the inside of the box (PAG used an indexable mold date insert).
#10
Rennlist Member
A few people have posted that the magnesium cooling fans coming from PAG are now made of aluminum, I wonder if this is more of the same? The part numbers you posted were in-use prior to the end of the 993 production (they show as dropped/replaced in a 1998 PET) when they were still magnesium. It would be interesting to see what the casting date is on the inside of the box (PAG used an indexable mold date insert).
I wish I still had my foundry. I worked with another foundry a year or so ago to help them develop a revolutionary new sand mix that was both environmentally safer, breathed better and made a mag casting better than I have ever seen. Although the sand is water based it requires no water additions. the mix created its own water through a chemical reaction in the mulling process resulting in a mix that required a maximum of 3% water vs 5-7%. The resulting casting was as clean as an investment casting and the parts we made I still have sitting outside for over a year now with no signs of oxidation....yet. Parts were cast in AZ91E so it is a low corrosion mag used mostly for navy applications.
Unfortunately he does not want to get involved with the DoD so finding an application for this is not easy and he has done nothing with it.
There might be a market here for him.
#11
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
They no longer come painted maybe? There was that time when a great number of people were convinced the chain box covers were phenolic... It would be really interesting to compare the weight of these to confirm. Porsche does not do a part revision, no matter how minor without a corresponding change in part number, not at least since the late nineties. I suppose there is always the chance that people are confusing uncoated magnesium for uncoated aluminum (not sure I could tell the difference)? I see people on the beach down here picking up lead keel weight thinking its silver treasure all the time. I'm almost convinced that the airline companies are seeding the beaches with the stuff so that tourists will have to pay extra for overweight baggage on their return flights home!
#13
Rennlist Member
They no longer come painted maybe? There was that time when a great number of people were convinced the chain box covers were phenolic... It would be really interesting to compare the weight of these to confirm. Porsche does not do a part revision, no matter how minor without a corresponding change in part number, not at least since the late nineties. I suppose there is always the chance that people are confusing uncoated magnesium for uncoated aluminum (not sure I could tell the difference)? I see people on the beach down here picking up lead keel weight thinking its silver treasure all the time. I'm almost convinced that the airline companies are seeding the beaches with the stuff so that tourists will have to pay extra for overweight baggage on their return flights home!
It IMO would be pretty irresponsible for Porsche to supply a magnesium part without some form of preservation. If they aren't painted and supplied that way then people need to be informed that painting is required. At a minimum a chrome acid pickle would help but then they would be more gray to gold in color.
As you noted untreated magnesium looks nearly identical to untreated aluminum without any passivation. I can tell but I worked with the stuff for 30 years.
I have heard stories how engine tins are coming from the suppliers in primer. Again this is not the product people are paying for and if this is what Porsche classic plans to feed its customers there will be a lot of unhappy Porsche owners.
As you said weigh the two side by side. Aluminum weighs approximately 1/3rd more than aluminum all things being the same. They wouldn't need different tooling to make them in aluminum so they would look identical. Aluminum and mag have the same shrinkage factor. Just like the aluminum valve covers are made from the same tooling as the old mag ones.
Edit: ^^^^ question answered thanks Robert
#14
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by cobalt
It IMO would be pretty irresponsible for Porsche to supply a magnesium part without some form of preservation.
I know going back to at least 2000'ish, that the engine tin (like all body parts) have come in primer.
#15
Rennlist Member
Sikorsky wanted me to convert over to WE43 about 25 years ago when Mag Electron was first pushing it. The cost to add all the necessary equipment to melt it was prohibitive for me.
The aluminum based alloys are pretty basic and are the oldest form and most commonly used up until recently. The rare earths alloys like EZ33A and ZE41A have their own level of complexity and benifits. I specialized in both the Aluminum based and Rare earths alloys. I never got involved with the WE alloys.