Rear Rotor/Disk question....
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: London
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Doing a break overhaul on my '93 C2, as I've done the big red calliper conversion up front and have drilled Disks, was looking to match the rear with drilled disks... My question is, is there an OEM drilled disk available to use on the rears?
Many thanks Sham
Many thanks Sham
#3
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Please do change to the bigger 993 brake booster and m/c and remove the p/v on the rear lines
#4
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What do you mean with p/v?
Thanks
Thanks
The 964 used the 968M030 rear disks, these are perforated and have the correct size and o/s for 964. You will want to use normal 993 rear calipers which are the replacements for 964RS rear calipers. They are physically the same as 964 4 piston rears but have bigger 30/34mm pistons
Please do change to the bigger 993 brake booster and m/c and remove the p/v on the rear lines
Please do change to the bigger 993 brake booster and m/c and remove the p/v on the rear lines
#5
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
911 from '85 and all 964, 993 up all use a p/v on the rear circuit
compare the brake torque @70bar line pressure, f/r, ratio
911 thru '83 1440/9.69, 1.491(this is close to perfect for these cars)
911 '84 thru '89 1440/1186, 1.22 w/o p/v, 1440/639, 2.260 w/
964 1974/1139, 1.734 w/o p/v, 1974/615, 3.210 w/(4 piston rears)
964RS 2381/751, 1.508 w/o p/v 2381/707, 2.792 w/
the 964 uses a 55bar p/v, below 55bar the w/o p/v is the # to use, above 55bar the w/ # is used
for street use p/v or will rarely make a difference
for track use(why else use big brakes?) you want to get the rear involved as much as possible
benefits
fronts run cooler and last longer
shorter braking distances because the rear is adding more to the work and using more of the bigger rear tires potential
as you can see from the above #s even a street car can get more out of it's rear brakes. The only car that really needed the p/v was the 3.2 Carrera and some guys that track those go w/o too, but carefully.
compare the brake torque @70bar line pressure, f/r, ratio
911 thru '83 1440/9.69, 1.491(this is close to perfect for these cars)
911 '84 thru '89 1440/1186, 1.22 w/o p/v, 1440/639, 2.260 w/
964 1974/1139, 1.734 w/o p/v, 1974/615, 3.210 w/(4 piston rears)
964RS 2381/751, 1.508 w/o p/v 2381/707, 2.792 w/
the 964 uses a 55bar p/v, below 55bar the w/o p/v is the # to use, above 55bar the w/ # is used
for street use p/v or will rarely make a difference
for track use(why else use big brakes?) you want to get the rear involved as much as possible
benefits
fronts run cooler and last longer
shorter braking distances because the rear is adding more to the work and using more of the bigger rear tires potential
as you can see from the above #s even a street car can get more out of it's rear brakes. The only car that really needed the p/v was the 3.2 Carrera and some guys that track those go w/o too, but carefully.
#7
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
On a similar note, does anyone know if a 993 rear cross drilled rotor will fit on the 964 rear with the correct spacing? The rotor dimensions seem to be the same, I'm just looking for another alternative to a 968 M030 rear rotor.
Thanks,
Jon
Thanks,
Jon
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
964 ans 993 rear rotors are the same size but they are not interchangeable because of the o/s
#9
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Part number should be
95135204191
If you find a good price let me know I need a set for my C2.
95135204191
If you find a good price let me know I need a set for my C2.