Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Best brakes for 17" wheels...Or should I go 18"?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-19-2014, 04:26 PM
  #16  
KaiB
Nordschleife Master
 
KaiB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Deep Downtown Carrier, OK
Posts: 5,297
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Goughary
While we are on the subject...

If 993tt/993nb calipers offer the best solution to still allow 17" cup wheels, what does he have to do with the brake bias? Are there any other changes to improve that setup for optimal performance...cooling aside...
For track use, a good idea here would be to toss (or gut) the p/v and run Pagid Yellows front and Blacks rear. This will get you pretty close.

I went extreme and run the 964 front calipers in the rear with RS rotors (yes I know) and use an adjustable Tilton bias valve.
Old 09-19-2014, 04:49 PM
  #17  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,337
Received 557 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Goughary
While we are on the subject...

If 993tt/993nb calipers offer the best solution to still allow 17" cup wheels, what does he have to do with the brake bias? Are there any other changes to improve that setup for optimal performance...cooling aside...
A stock '69-83 911 S or SC had f/r brake torque ratio of 1.491, no p/v

A stock 964RSA, 1.734 below 55bar line pressure and 3.210 above, these cars can easily get better and get the rear to do more work by just removing the p/v

a stock 964RS, 1.713 below 55bar line pressure and 3.171 above, again, remove the p/v as was done on the 964 Cups.

993tt/RS front and rear on a 964, 1.659 below 55bar line pressure and 3.071 above, again removing the p/v is beneficial

993 front and rear on a 964, 1.604 below 55bar line pressure and 2.970 above, again removing the p/v is beneficial

if you don't need a parking brake 993RS on a 964, 1.426 below 55bar 2.640 above, again removing the p/v is beneficial

the lower the ratio the more beneficial a low stiff suspension w/ an effective lsd is
Old 09-19-2014, 09:29 PM
  #18  
mkd944
Racer
 
mkd944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 368
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Just FYI as another data point...I get no brake fade with my stock brakes, fresh ATE Super Blue (now Gold), Kumho R compounds on Cup 1's, Hawk HT-10 pads which I love for their great stopping power with a more progressive feel than the Pagid Orange / Black pads that I used to use. The Pagids also used to leave excess pad material on my rotors causing bad brake judder at times. 15-30 minute DE sessions at some hard braking tracks (Sebring, Road Atlanta). I don't track my 964 much since getting a Miata nearly 2 years ago. I run the same fluid and pads on the Miata too. YMMV.

Good luck!
Old 09-19-2014, 10:00 PM
  #19  
RSAErick
Burning Brakes
 
RSAErick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,198
Received 42 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Yes, in general the stock 964 brakes with fresh ATE fluid and good dedicated track pads (Performance Friction has several models) should hold up well at most DE-type track events under normal circumstances. The slight exception is if you have the older/smaller 2-pot rear brake calipers, which may not have enough pad material to dissipate the heat under extreme track conditions. What year is your 964?

I don't know anything about the Brembo brakes that you refer to; however, I would think that the most logical and straightforward brake upgrade would be one of the proper combinations that include the 993TT fronts. This requires 993 master cylinder and booster, and some other modifications; but is otherwise a mostly bolt-on option. Balance is important (as Bill V shows), but the braking and heat capacity is beyond what most mortals could ever need.
Old 09-20-2014, 10:17 AM
  #20  
Goughary
Race Car
 
Goughary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: fairfield, CT
Posts: 4,860
Likes: 0
Received 428 Likes on 278 Posts
Default

D90 wheels will not fit over the 993TT fronts correct?
Old 09-20-2014, 11:39 AM
  #21  
KaiB
Nordschleife Master
 
KaiB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Deep Downtown Carrier, OK
Posts: 5,297
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mkd944
Just FYI as another data point...I get no brake fade with my stock brakes, fresh ATE Super Blue (now Gold), Kumho R compounds on Cup 1's, Hawk HT-10 pads which I love for their great stopping power with a more progressive feel than the Pagid Orange / Black pads that I used to use. The Pagids also used to leave excess pad material on my rotors causing bad brake judder at times. 15-30 minute DE sessions at some hard braking tracks (Sebring, Road Atlanta). I don't track my 964 much since getting a Miata nearly 2 years ago. I run the same fluid and pads on the Miata too. YMMV.

Good luck!
I'd wager Mike, that it was the oranges that left the deposits. The others do not.
Old 09-20-2014, 12:56 PM
  #22  
breljohn
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
breljohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 776
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Mine is a 1989 C4
4 pot all around then. Right?
Old 09-21-2014, 01:37 PM
  #23  
RSAErick
Burning Brakes
 
RSAErick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,198
Received 42 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by breljohn
Mine is a 1989 C4
4 pot all around then. Right?
Yes, from what I understand, all C4's used the 4 pot rears.
Old 09-21-2014, 06:06 PM
  #24  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,337
Received 557 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RSAErick
Yes, from what I understand, all C4's used the 4 pot rears.
They do, plus they have the bigger 23.8mm m/c stadard and can use the 25.4 too if needed
Old 09-21-2014, 06:58 PM
  #25  
breljohn
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
breljohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 776
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Bill, I know you're kind of he brakes expert on here
What would be your recommendation for my application?
Stick with my set up and improve pads and fluid?
Bid reds?
Brembo?

Thanks!
Old 09-21-2014, 08:03 PM
  #26  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,337
Received 557 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by breljohn
Bill, I know you're kind of he brakes expert on here
What would be your recommendation for my application?
Stick with my set up and improve pads and fluid?
Bid reds?
Brembo?

Thanks!
I'm not at all familiar w/ the current Brembo offerings

As has been mentioned ATE 200(aka blue) is a fine street b/f but is less than optimal for stressed track applications, If you have a car w/ really outstanding brakes that aren't stressed under track conditions it would be fine too but 964 stock brakes are certainly stressed. I'd first try a more track oriented fluid, SRF is best but Endless RF650, Motul RBF600 and others are not far behind, Here's a great interactive b/f compendium, Brake fluid comparison

Either 964RS or 993tt w/ 993 rear would probably be more than sufficient for your purposes, the bias could be more rear on either of these so, remove the p/v to help that. This sort of setup should be 1/2 the cost of a Brembo set.

I'd also advise against using holey rotors, use slotted for much better rotor life.
Old 09-21-2014, 10:58 PM
  #27  
mkd944
Racer
 
mkd944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 368
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KaiB
I'd wager Mike, that it was the oranges that left the deposits. The others do not.
You are correct Kai. It was definitely the orange pads I was running up front. I should not have implicated the black pads in my statement. I used black pads on the rears without issue but when I started using the HT-10s, I just liked the feel so much, I quit experimenting with the Pagids.
Old 09-22-2014, 07:15 PM
  #28  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,337
Received 557 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mkd944
You are correct Kai. It was definitely the orange pads I was running up front. I should not have implicated the black pads in my statement. I used black pads on the rears without issue but when I started using the HT-10s, I just liked the feel so much, I quit experimenting with the Pagids.
Pagid Orange are about the worst pads I've ever seen. I can't believe that anyone still uses them. I had them on my car for a few months years ago and thew them away. Pure junk.

Pagid yellow RS29 or black RS14 on the other hand are great products, alternatives to these would be PFC 01 or 11
Old 09-23-2014, 08:47 AM
  #29  
KaiB
Nordschleife Master
 
KaiB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Deep Downtown Carrier, OK
Posts: 5,297
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Bill, I've run the RS29s exclusively for quite some time now and am very happy with them.

How do the PFCs differ in terms of feel, grip, modulation and longevity...and price; might want to try, a lot of guys seem to like them.
Old 02-16-2015, 02:36 PM
  #30  
breljohn
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
breljohn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 776
Received 19 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Reviving this thread.
I've decided to keep my set up and "upgrade" it
Changing pads and fluids to your recommendation - thanks guys.
Should I also change brake lines and discs?
If yes (not sure mine ever got replaced...) what should i go for?

Thanks!


Quick Reply: Best brakes for 17" wheels...Or should I go 18"?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:36 PM.