Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C4 geometrie road/track car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-15-2012, 05:59 PM
  #31  
Porsche964FP
Drifting
 
Porsche964FP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: London UK
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by freedman
My Indy put mine on, so no it was easy
-964 man points

Originally Posted by kos11-12
Frank are those H&R bars work well ? ...
we all have more or less bump steer issues (toe out) when lowering the cars to RS or more.
Roll bars are exceptional - on rails. Mind you, I installed them at the same time as the KWVs, so difficult to tell since the suspension upgrade would have done wonders also.

True bump steer is always going to be an issue. I'm interested in your drop link solution as opposed to 993RS uprights/ hubs.
Old 10-15-2012, 06:21 PM
  #32  
alexjc4
Three Wheelin'
 
alexjc4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kos11-12
I think more caster helps the wheels to self aligne straight quicker
I have 3,5 with no issues,
Some people mention between 4 to 4,5 (max)
Wonder what could be the right balance between front & rear toe & camber to improve the C4 handling,
Or should it just be like the C2 ....!?

Frank are those H&R bars work well ? ...
we all have more or less bump steer issues (toe out) when lowering the cars to RS or more.
The difference betweem the c2 and c4 is of course we have the addition of equivalent of a VW Golf/Rabbit driving the front wheels. So my instinct is to mix in some Fwd settings. From memory front wheel drive cars will use toe out to improve turn in and reduce understeer. Otherwise same, lots of camber and caster. Without power steering FWD setups tend to dial down the caster so you aren't having to lift the front of the car with your arms.

The 993 uprights seem to be the most common solution for bump steer. Why is it you dont like that solution?
Old 10-16-2012, 01:06 AM
  #33  
sml
Three Wheelin'
 
sml's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,564
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

kos11-12 ... dont waste your time debating caster. with your new wheels, you'll need to go max caster to stop the tyre rubbing on the corner of the guard at the 9 o'clock position (as the max caster will pull the wheel laterally towards the front of the car).
Old 10-16-2012, 02:30 AM
  #34  
anto1150
Pro
 
anto1150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Abruzzo (ITALY)
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

IMHO, there's no difference in caster and camber between a C2 and a C4. You can work on the toe, bars and rake to reduce a C4's tendency to understeer.
Compared to a C2, you'll need a thicker rear bar, some more rake (about 5 mm?) and less front toe (but I wound never go in negative land because you loose grip under hard braking and high speed stalility).
Old 10-16-2012, 02:38 AM
  #35  
kos11-12
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
kos11-12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London UK & Paris FR
Posts: 1,702
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexjc4
The difference betweem the c2 and c4 is of course we have the addition of equivalent of a VW Golf/Rabbit driving the front wheels. So my instinct is to mix in some Fwd settings. From memory front wheel drive cars will use toe out to improve turn in and reduce understeer. Otherwise same, lots of camber and caster. Without power steering FWD setups tend to dial down the caster so you aren't having to lift the front of the car with your arms.

The 993 uprights seem to be the most common solution for bump steer. Why is it you dont like that solution?
Very interesting point, isn't that some FWD cars have the steering rack at the front and height, but also the wheel carrier arm is at the front,
Those may have a toe In when suspension compress ....?! Maybe that's why they dial some toe out...?! But yes that may work...!
Wonder why I have + 0,12 degrees individual toe at the front.

The 93 RS wheel hub is a buitiful pieces of engineering,
A few peopol reported curing the bump steer issue by raising the front (raising the steering rack) lowering the point where the outer tie rod is bolted has the same effect, but there is a few thing to consider, it will probably work better on a 18 wheel as there is more space between the carrier arm and the edge of the rim, to be able to play with spacers I think using a spherical bearing increases a lot the feel of the steering, I will try to post a drawing of the part I am think making. I imagine the actual 64 outer tie rod with a spherical bearing pressed in ....
Old 10-16-2012, 02:58 AM
  #36  
kos11-12
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
kos11-12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London UK & Paris FR
Posts: 1,702
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sml
kos11-12 ... dont waste your time debating caster. with your new wheels, you'll need to go max caster to stop the tyre rubbing on the corner of the guard at the 9 o'clock position (as the max caster will pull the wheel laterally towards the front of the car).
Yes for sure the caster as to be max ,

Anto,
a bigger bar at the back has also been mention by a few peopol who race the C4...
probably toe , what do you mean for the rack about 5mm ?
Old 10-16-2012, 03:06 AM
  #37  
anto1150
Pro
 
anto1150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Abruzzo (ITALY)
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The height difference between rear and front.
Compared to the tipical Euro RS heights, on a C4, I'd also try to rise the rear end a little (say 5 mm).
Old 10-16-2012, 05:21 AM
  #38  
kos11-12
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
kos11-12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London UK & Paris FR
Posts: 1,702
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Ha yes of course,
that's what I have 5mm lower than RS at the front !
I need to remeasure it all ; it was done a few years ago and have the alignement done again...

actualy thanks to Garreth a rennlister here who race a C4 in US
Old 10-16-2012, 02:49 PM
  #39  
anto1150
Pro
 
anto1150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Abruzzo (ITALY)
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Rather than lowering the front below Euro RS specs, which will lead to increased bump-steer, I'd rise the tail...
Just my personal opinion.
Old 10-16-2012, 03:58 PM
  #40  
kos11-12
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
kos11-12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London UK & Paris FR
Posts: 1,702
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by anto1150
Rather than lowering the front below Euro RS specs, which will lead to increased bump-steer, I'd rise the tail...
Just my personal opinion.
yes good point, I will go through everything soon, a shop in London did it for me a few years ago...

Anto
by the way I live in Cannes not far from Italy... is there any good track days organised, I think Imola is the closes ...
Old 10-16-2012, 04:08 PM
  #41  
Porsche964FP
Drifting
 
Porsche964FP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: London UK
Posts: 2,655
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kos11-12
yes good point, I will go through everything soon, a shop in London did it for me a few years ago...
Out of curiosity which London shop?
Old 10-16-2012, 04:52 PM
  #42  
kos11-12
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
kos11-12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London UK & Paris FR
Posts: 1,702
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

GT ONE, Chertsey Surrey,
Old 10-16-2012, 07:35 PM
  #43  
anto1150
Pro
 
anto1150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Abruzzo (ITALY)
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by kos11-12
Anto
by the way I live in Cannes not far from Italy... is there any good track days organised, I think Imola is the closes ...
Kos,

I think Mugello is #1, and it's also not far from you! (closer than Imola).
Here's a link for you: http://www.promoracing.it/?zona=calendarioauto
Old 10-17-2012, 03:24 AM
  #44  
kos11-12
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
kos11-12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: London UK & Paris FR
Posts: 1,702
Received 23 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by anto1150
Kos,

I think Mugello is #1, and it's also not far from you! (closer than Imola).
Here's a link for you: http://www.promoracing.it/?zona=calendarioauto
Thanks for the link ,
Yes that's an option as well 50 km difference from Cannes...
Old 10-17-2012, 09:33 AM
  #45  
boxsey911
Nordschleife Master
 
boxsey911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 5,095
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kos11-12
C2 21 ...!?

Mine is 20 mm C4 1992 ( manufacture)
Yes, 21 was fitted to the rears of early C2s. My guess is that Porsche reduced it to 20 later to perhaps reduce the potential for oversteer. My '90' has the 21 and I really like the way it feels..a little bit oversteer without being too aggressive.

+1 to the suggestions for max caster (mine's at 4 30 which is close the upper limit). It weights up the steering, reduces the 'light front end feel' and improves stability at speed.



Quick Reply: C4 geometrie road/track car



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:20 PM.