Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

H&R sway (anti roll) bars on a c2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-11-2012, 04:05 AM
  #1  
g60pops
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
g60pops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default H&R sway (anti roll) bars on a c2

i am in the process of fitting some KW V1 coilovers to a c2 cab and i have a set of H&R sway bars from my previous c4, is it worth fitting them to the c2 cab?
I am hesitant due to their 24mm and 26mm size
Old 02-11-2012, 05:34 AM
  #2  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I have gone this route on my C2. KW V1 with H&R bars, I also added a strut brace for good measure. Impressions so far are good.
The bars dont affect the ride or damping, but the change they make during fast cornering is very evident, the car is absolutely flat. Where the original set up seemed to 'lock up' under these conditions the KW's continue damping properly. The front / rear balance is excellent under all conditions.
It is early days yet, also worth noting that all the miles I have managed have been in freezing conditions so not optimal for either the tyres or the suspension. It warms up next week so I can test over more demanding conditions. Just got to put on some new RS engine mounts and then I will be able to comment in more detail.
Old 02-11-2012, 11:47 AM
  #3  
g60pops
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
g60pops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That is good to hear mate, i shall go ahead and fit the H&R bars together with the V1s.
Already have strut brace fitted and have ordered the rs engine mounts together with new top mounts and gaskets.
Old 02-11-2012, 01:57 PM
  #4  
Andy Roe
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Andy Roe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bologna, Italy
Posts: 3,605
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I've the same with my V3's. Very pleased with it so far.
Old 02-11-2012, 02:33 PM
  #5  
boxsey911
Nordschleife Master
 
boxsey911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Cheshire, UK
Posts: 5,095
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hmmm.....I've been holding out to get genuine RS bars but at half the price for the H&R, you guys have got me thinking now!
Old 02-11-2012, 02:43 PM
  #6  
anto1150
Pro
 
anto1150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Abruzzo (ITALY)
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would never put stiff suspensions and big bars on a cab... IMO go with RS bars and not-too-stiff springs/dumpers. That said, I vould choose a V3 setup and set it firm, but not stiff.

just my 0,00002 cents

ciao
Old 02-11-2012, 02:48 PM
  #7  
g60pops
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
g60pops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by anto1150
I would never put stiff suspensions and big bars on a cab... IMO go with RS bars and not-too-stiff springs/dumpers. That said, I vould choose a V3 setup and set it firm, but not stiff.

just my 0,00002 cents

ciao
if i had an bigger budget then i would have gone for the v3s
Old 02-11-2012, 03:03 PM
  #8  
anto1150
Pro
 
anto1150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Abruzzo (ITALY)
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

big bars will generate a lot of flex... at least a 26 rear...
I think V1s won't be too stiff, so could be a good start. Then you could fine-tune with II hand bars from those who change theyrs...
What bars are you running at the moment?
Old 02-11-2012, 03:34 PM
  #9  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

The reason for choosing the KW V1 was very simple, I spoke with KW. They advised that the V1 is made by first getting the V3 optimised and then using these settings to produce the V1 i.e no adjustment. The damping and rebound settings sit within the V3 range, the spring rates are the same, build quality is the same, but the price significantly less. I know from previous experience that I would not use the adjustments, it is just too much trouble on a 911.
The H&R bars are the same size as the RS on the front but bigger on the rear, but they are a matched pair built for use with coilover suspension. The difference over standard is surprising and imho a very worthwhile mod, especially if you are doing track days.
Old 02-11-2012, 03:50 PM
  #10  
anto1150
Pro
 
anto1150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Abruzzo (ITALY)
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

RS rear is 18: a completely different route compared to H&R... which IMHO seem to be designed to address the C4 understeer.
As said, I wouldn't stress a cab too much... at least not before trying other solutions.
Old 02-12-2012, 08:59 AM
  #11  
g60pops
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
g60pops's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ras62
I have gone this route on my C2. KW V1 with H&R bars, I also added a strut brace for good measure. Impressions so far are good.
The bars dont affect the ride or damping, but the change they make during fast cornering is very evident, the car is absolutely flat. Where the original set up seemed to 'lock up' under these conditions the KW's continue damping properly. The front / rear balance is excellent under all conditions.
It is early days yet, also worth noting that all the miles I have managed have been in freezing conditions so not optimal for either the tyres or the suspension. It warms up next week so I can test over more demanding conditions. Just got to put on some new RS engine mounts and then I will be able to comment in more detail.
What settings do you have the front and rear bars at?
Old 02-12-2012, 09:28 AM
  #12  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Both bars are set to minimum, front and back i.e the holes furthest from the horizontal bar. Adding these bars should aid torsional stiffness of the chassis which must be a positive, especially on the Targa.
Old 02-12-2012, 08:22 PM
  #13  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ras62
Adding these bars should aid torsional stiffness of the chassis which must be a positive, especially on the Targa.
Nossir,..no effective change whatsoever.

Stiffening the suspension: springs or bars, has no effect unless you've added more stiffening to the chassis itself. This means sill plates, rear seat bracing, roll bars/roll cages, etc.
Old 02-13-2012, 05:42 AM
  #14  
ras62
Burning Brakes
 
ras62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Cheshire UK
Posts: 782
Received 16 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

...."This means sill plates, rear seat bracing, roll bars/roll cages, etc".
The roll bars are part of the chassis, either directly or indirectly depending on your point of view, so changing them must surely aid the stiffness of the chassis?
Old 02-13-2012, 08:34 AM
  #15  
KaiB
Banned
 
KaiB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Deep Downtown Carrier, OK
Posts: 5,297
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I think Steve means roll bars in the sense of a half cage, or roll-over protection.

Think about how and where the "anti roll" or sway bars work, and what they do.


Quick Reply: H&R sway (anti roll) bars on a c2



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:49 PM.