Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

C&D Ducktail Lift retardation graph ('74)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-24-2009 | 09:31 AM
  #1  
elbeee964's Avatar
elbeee964
Thread Starter
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,405
Likes: 74
From: S.E. VA
Cool C&D Ducktail Lift retardation graph ('74)

I lifted this article (below) from a Feb. '74 Car & Driver while doing research on 911's, once, a long time ago...

It's been years since I copied it, but I've never seen anyone since publish this rather simple, yet profound display of why 911's benefit from tails.

Lately it seemed appropriate to dig it out, given all the recent talk of ducktails (Singer, 911 "Sport Classic")

One thing that I disagree with in the article: That ducktail didn't provide "substantial vertical down forces" - it only retards ('spoils') lift generated by the basic 911 profile. Gravity was producing all the down force.

A 964 and early 911 have the same profile.
So, if your tail doesn't deploy at speed, your wheels ARE following that graph's "without rear spoiler" (weight-off-rear-wheels) curve.

Anyone wanna generate a 964 graph?
Enjoy.

Attachment 401421

Last edited by elbeee964; 06-21-2010 at 01:43 PM.
Old 11-24-2009 | 11:01 AM
  #2  
Rocket Rob's Avatar
Rocket Rob
IHI KING!
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 13,395
Likes: 223
From: Nashua, New Hampshire, USA
Default

Lonnie,

Thanks for sharing. This is an interesting article.
Old 11-24-2009 | 11:44 AM
  #3  
Computamedic's Avatar
Computamedic
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,632
Likes: 2
From: Milton Keynes, UK
Default

Thanks for that Lonnie. It just goes to prove that messing around with different designs of rear spoilers should always be balanced by a matching "enhancement" to the front as well.

Regards

Dave




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:28 AM.