Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Save the Planet: Drive a Porsche

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-29-2009, 02:41 PM
  #1  
911Jetta
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911Jetta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 7,214
Received 486 Likes on 279 Posts
Default Save the Planet: Drive a Porsche

This story kind of mirrors my life...

Save enough money by commuting (by bike) to easily buy a car that I've always wanted. Then, when I drive, it's in something very special!

Unfortunately my routes aren't always as special as the car. After not driving for a week, I have to take the kids to soccer practice... again, at least it's in something special!

Save the Planet: Drive a Porsche
How a classic car can be greener than your Prius.

http://www.slate.com/id/2233834/pagenum/all/#p2

Last edited by 911Jetta; 10-29-2009 at 02:42 PM. Reason: text
Old 10-29-2009, 03:24 PM
  #2  
JG 996T
Rennlist Member
 
JG 996T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 3,205
Received 542 Likes on 295 Posts
Default

Great story! Not sure if I'm going to abandon my DD Honda, but sounds similar to the search I'm on right now.
Old 10-29-2009, 03:31 PM
  #3  
BlueHeeler
Rennlist Member
 
BlueHeeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am a secret eco-nut. All factors considered, a 964 is one of the most eco friendly cars you can own.

Manufacturing is a large factor in environmental impact. IIRC the average car is designed to last ~10 years. There are a lot of 964 here at ~20 years showing no need for replacement. Factoring manufacturing, a new Prius is going to need a lot of time (probably exceeding the lifespan of the car) to match the minimal impact per mile of a 964. Let’s see what that same 2009 Prius is doing in 20 years.

It is ironic (maybe moronic) to see, ‘Eco-friendly Car of the Year’ articles and awards.


Old 10-29-2009, 04:13 PM
  #4  
elbeee964
Nordschleife Master
 
elbeee964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 5,405
Received 74 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Ho-hum.
The 'Progressive' flavoring of the piece spoiled my reading of what I hoped would become a perspective on vintage 911s.
(I *really* was waiting for him to get more into that '66 911!)

The writer takes the pitch-perfect metrosexual, Progressive stance:
'Cars are the crappy choice for the hoi-paloi. Mass transit's where it's at!'
'But I'm the exception to the rule, and here's my justification: I wanna cool 911!'


He disparages others for making the same choice he's longing for.
Then bestows approval on his own plans with a bunch of self-rationalizations.

[blech] Pass.

But a nice link was provided to that classic Risky Business line: "Who's the U-boat commander?"
Heh. Forever a classic.
Old 10-29-2009, 04:20 PM
  #5  
kevjandon
Racer
 
kevjandon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Grand Rapids
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is why I didn't understand the cash for clukers thing.

Get folks to trade in perfectly good, running cars so they can be destroyed(remember you had to show insurance and regristration for the last year) for brand new ones.

How is it eco friendly to destroy something that works and manufactuer its replacement?

It's like ripping out your driveway because it has a crack and putting a new one in its place. It is not eco-friendly at all.
Old 10-29-2009, 04:44 PM
  #6  
BlueHeeler
Rennlist Member
 
BlueHeeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by kevjandon
This is why I didn't understand the cash for clukers thing.

Get folks to trade in perfectly good, running cars so they can be destroyed(remember you had to show insurance and regristration for the last year) for brand new ones.

How is it eco friendly to destroy something that works and manufactuer its replacement?

It's like ripping out your driveway because it has a crack and putting a new one in its place. It is not eco-friendly at all.
You are correct. Cash for Clunkers had NOTHING to do with environmental improvement. It was about economic stimulus.
Old 10-30-2009, 03:20 AM
  #7  
Busta Rib
Rennlist Member
 
Busta Rib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bend OR
Posts: 1,779
Received 1,118 Likes on 419 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlueHeeler
You are correct. Cash for Clunkers had NOTHING to do with environmental improvement. It was about economic stimulus.
Werd.
Old 10-30-2009, 03:26 AM
  #8  
ACSGP
Pro
 
ACSGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BlueHeeler

Manufacturing is a large factor in environmental impact. IIRC the average car is designed to last ~10 years. There are a lot of 964 here at ~20 years showing no need for replacement. Factoring manufacturing, a new Prius is going to need a lot of time (probably exceeding the lifespan of the car) to match the minimal impact per mile of a 964. Let’s see what that same 2009 Prius is doing in 20 years.
Manufacturing costs aside, the biggest issue lies in how the batteries are disposed. The hybrid car makers are pretty secretive about this and the environmental impact they could have.

It's greenest running an old, well maintained car.



Quick Reply: Save the Planet: Drive a Porsche



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:30 PM.