Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Control arm bolt replacement... needed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2008, 09:51 AM
  #16  
springer3
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
springer3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,576
Received 49 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by elbeee964
Springer, speaking of such, what must you think of the factory's dead-soft, cad-plated, socket head, seat hold down bolts?
(did I say, 'dead'-soft? )
I don't know. Soft bolts have much greater plastic elongation at break than stronger grades. I suspect either loads are not great enough to justify a high-strength bolt, or perhaps they wanted the greater elongation-at-rupture characteristics. Bolts can be designed to control failure mode, and perhaps the factory needed for the seat bolts to break before something more critical.

I know all about rounding out the socket-head and having to drill the *&^%$# things out.

Last edited by springer3; 02-24-2008 at 10:21 AM. Reason: Added "failure mode" control to reason for soft/weak bolts
Old 02-24-2008, 10:17 AM
  #17  
springer3
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
springer3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,576
Received 49 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MisterRisky
Suspect bolt markings list with examples. It's a PDF.

Here is another PDF that is from a DOE training session on counterfeit fasteners and industrial valves, etc.
Wow - did you get to the part about the counterfeit bullet-proof vests?

Almost all the counterfeit bolts in the 1990s scandal were manufactured in Japan. In their defense, the Japanese factories did not understand the SAE and ASTM grade marks. They filled orders from unscrupulous suppliers who requested the marks on bolts meeting lower grade standards.

Listing a head mark on the USPTO fastener registry simply means they registered. It does not imply the Government or anyone else has verifyed they provide bolts that meet the requirements for their grade markings. It is still pretty much caveat emptor in the bolt business.
Old 02-24-2008, 03:17 PM
  #18  
elbeee964
Nordschleife Master
 
elbeee964's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: S.E. VA
Posts: 5,405
Received 74 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by springer3
...and perhaps the factory needed for the seat bolts to break before something more critical.
That's sounding suspiciously like the the old I'd-rather-be-thrown-clear school of seat bolt design.

And, ahhh, if ya need me, springer, I'll be over here... in the Jesus-please-keep-my-seat-bolts-unbroken corner of the room.


(And I feel yer pain, brother, in rounding out one of those factory seat socket heads -- &%$#%!!!)
Old 02-24-2008, 03:42 PM
  #19  
MisterRisky
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
MisterRisky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Highland Park, IL (Chicagoland)
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by elbeee964
That's sounding suspiciously like the the old I'd-rather-be-thrown-clear school of seat bolt design.
I'm not so quick to throw out Springer's idea. If you look at the bottom of your seatbelt, underneath the plastic shroud, you will see our seatbelts are designed to rip out stitching prior to fully loading the webbing. This "rip cord" design basically slows the moving meat down some prior to the webbing taking the rest of the load. It's both easier on the person and puts a lower load on the belt webbing if the stitching can fail gracefully and then load up the seat belt. This is sort of the "controlled failure" that Springer talks about.

Honestly though, I can't come up with a good reason not to use the strongest bolt possible when holding the seats down.



Quick Reply: Control arm bolt replacement... needed?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:55 AM.