Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

strange lean condition

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2008, 05:28 PM
  #16  
mjshira
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mjshira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 573
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by swmic
I know some old hot rodders use to take starter fluid and spray it around. If they found the location of the vacuum leak, the rpms would suddenly increase.
that is a good point. I can try that.
Old 01-18-2008, 05:29 PM
  #17  
mjshira
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mjshira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 573
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by sperki11
Isn't the stoichiometric a/f mixture around 14.7 parts air to 1 part fuel. Any reading less than 14.7 would be considered rich, therefore a reading greater than 14.7 would be lean. Based on the WOT readings, I would say you're running rich, not lean. Do I have this correct?

I know if doesn't explain the ping...

I appreciate what you are saying. But I CAN NOT understand this being the case if the car pings, and trust me, she does!
Old 01-18-2008, 05:40 PM
  #18  
MisterRisky
Rennlist Member
 
MisterRisky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Highland Park, IL (Chicagoland)
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm speaking out of ignorance here, but might this be an issue of the computer not advancing/retarding timing properly?

I guess, as mentioned earlier, you should calibrate your sensor to ensure it really is lean... it could be pinging for other reasons and you could spend a lot of time under the assumption it is too much air causing it.
Old 01-18-2008, 06:09 PM
  #19  
sperki11
AutoX
 
sperki11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree with JD on the timing issue and looking for other reasons. From what little I know, I don't think "pinging" is caused by incorrect a/f mixture (except maybe in an extreme lean condition). If the problem is ping (detonation issue), probable causes are improper fuel octane rating, advanced timing, or higher than normal compression. Experts?
Old 01-18-2008, 06:09 PM
  #20  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mjshira
Vac leak at the idle control valve? Ok, I'll check for that I assume a little bit of water or just ones finger to see?

I will check all the throttle body connections. Going to have to get into those anyway because I'll be removing 1/2 of the intake system anyway.

Best way to check for vac is?

The safest way is to use a smoke machine, more than likely you don't have one.
You can pressurize the intake system, it's fairly simple. Remove the AFM, connect some sort of a canister with a vacuum fitting on it to the rubber boot/elbow, use compressed air 10-20psi and listen for leaks. If you have a old fuel filter, cut one end off, and install it where the AFM goes. The Fuel filter can be made to accept a hose for the pressurized air.
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 01-18-2008, 06:16 PM
  #21  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sperki11
I agree with JD on the timing issue and looking for other reasons. From what little I know, I don't think "pinging" is caused by incorrect a/f mixture (except maybe in an extreme lean condition). If the problem is ping (detonation issue), probable causes are improper fuel octane rating, advanced timing, or higher than normal compression. Experts?
Running 15AFR under load between 4000-5000RPM is not good. This may be causing it to knock. However there might be other issues as well.

Ignition can also cause knock.The ignition is handled by the chip, and he's using the factory chip! I would think the CR must be higher than stock for knock to happen or there is a mechanical issue(s).

I would fix the AFR first. Then if there is knock, it's time to start looking at other possible causes.
Old 01-18-2008, 06:21 PM
  #22  
MisterRisky
Rennlist Member
 
MisterRisky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Highland Park, IL (Chicagoland)
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for your input here John. Always good to have input from someone who speaks from experience not just theory.
Old 01-18-2008, 06:39 PM
  #23  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MisterRisky
Thanks for your input here John. Always good to have input from someone who speaks from experience not just theory.
My pleasure, tnank you.


James, set the FQS to position #6. (#0 is all of the way counterclockwise), #1 is one click to the right...
#7 is all of the way to the right (clockwise). #6 is one click counterclockwise from #7.

#6 should richen the mixture and will pull timing as well. I would operate in this mode while testing, for added safety.

Keep in mind I reprogram the FQS differently, so the above FQS settings do not apply to the chip I'm sending you.

Have fun.
Old 01-18-2008, 08:31 PM
  #24  
mjshira
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mjshira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 573
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Thanks John.

I've got a lot of work to do.

It is important to understand that the DME is new, the AFM is new, the ICV is new, the fuel pump is new, the fuel filter is new, the chip is stock, so I am really lost here. With this thread I am better positioned to start to look for the cause. I am going to check fuel pressure. Just need to order the kit to do that as pepboys (best local option here) didn't have one that would work. Great being in BFE.
Old 01-19-2008, 12:00 AM
  #25  
deoxford
Pro
 
deoxford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This sounds like a distributer issue, maybe it is not retarding as the computer calls for it.
Old 01-19-2008, 12:52 AM
  #26  
mjshira
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mjshira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 573
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

How is this possible? Is there someone that rebuild the dizzy?
Old 01-19-2008, 01:40 AM
  #27  
slammed1000
Advanced
 
slammed1000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by deoxford
This sounds like a distributer issue, maybe it is not retarding as the computer calls for it.
derek, with the bosch hammer hooked up the timing advanced and retarded within the set limits. i think it is a vaccum issue or the fpr bad..
just wish i had more tme to help...

for all interested the higher the a/f number the leaner....the lower the richer.
motorcycles that i tune is optimized around 12.5-12.8. the leaner they are the moe power they make but you also run the risk of detonation.
Old 01-19-2008, 09:14 AM
  #28  
mjshira
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mjshira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 573
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by slammed1000
derek, with the bosch hammer hooked up the timing advanced and retarded within the set limits. i think it is a vaccum issue or the fpr bad..
just wish i had more tme to help...

for all interested the higher the a/f number the leaner....the lower the richer.
motorcycles that i tune is optimized around 12.5-12.8. the leaner they are the moe power they make but you also run the risk of detonation.
Thanks Brent, I appreciate the post and your help. The silver lining of all this is that I get to learn more with each project. I forgot about our testing with the hammer, we did see the timing across the hammer function properly.

Old 01-19-2008, 10:12 AM
  #29  
jneteler
Racer
 
jneteler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by slammed1000
the leaner they are the moe power they make but you also run the risk of detonation.
That is not quite correct. There is an ideal mixture to produce peak power and it can be approached from either the rich or lean side of the mixture curve.

The best info I have come across comes that other domain of air cooled engines - general aviation.

Goto www.gami.com and then click on the "Lean Test" button. Near the bottom of the page there is a graph that depicts mixture vs. power vs. fuel consumption.

Regards,

JNeteler
Old 01-19-2008, 10:16 AM
  #30  
mjshira
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mjshira's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hermosa Beach, CA
Posts: 573
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I think it is hard to compare these two scenarios. Consider the impact of altitude on air density for example.


Quick Reply: strange lean condition



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:40 PM.