Excellence Ariticle: 964 vs 968
#16
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I always loved the shape of the original 944- preferably a 1985 1/2 with the updated suspension/interior. I wouldn't want one in place of my 911, but if I had the space I'd love a clean unmolested one- especially given the relatively low price. Last year someone locally was selling a low mileage (20-30K miles) 1987 or so and I thought about it, but I'm out of space. As it is now, I've got 3 cars in a 2 car garage (one on a lift) since the VW is up from the beach "visting", and 2 cars in the driveway since I'm baby sitting a car while my parents are in Florida for the winter and my daily driver is out there...these cars are like kids...ha!
#17
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes they look cool. I miss mine. If it were Silver or Blue I would have kept it forever as a daily driver. The hatch back was great. It was smooth and stable on the freeway at high speeds. The AC worked awsome, almost too good. The down sides were the cheap interior, the rattles and squeaks and the poor ride and drivetrain lash at low speeds. As you picked up speed, those issues went away. As a result, I always found myself driving way too fast with the windows down!
I do like my 964 much better though, and did not have room for 2 toys, so I sold the 968.
I do like my 964 much better though, and did not have room for 2 toys, so I sold the 968.
#18
Drifting
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas/FortWorth Texas
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by andrew911
I always loved the shape of the original 944-
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
#19
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ilko
Anthony yes, this was #155. The only front engined cars in this issue were the 968 and a 944 GTR race car. I don't think your car was in it.
Well I sold the car anyhow.
I know it would be disappointing performance compared to my 964, but it would probably be more civil for daily use, I think. I think I'd want an S2 rather than a turbo
I have a friend that has built a 968 turbo using factory components. Very nice car and quite fast, would definitely own one if it was economical . You could also purchase a modified 964 turbo, 993TT or 997TT for what he has into it.
I really liked my S2, fun car and for the money you can't go wrong. Although the 968's were better built cars they still suffered from many of the same shortcomings the 944's did and if you have the money to step up to the 964 I would not think twice. Although if I were buying a cab I would have a hard time since I think the 968 makes a better cab than a 964 and the lines of the 968 cab with the roof down are quite special. But I have little need for a cab so i don't have to make that decision.
#20
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ltc
Harm Lagaay was quoted as saying the 968 was the most beautiful Porsche he ever designed. They're another Porsche 'cast off'; very few 'new' Porsche owners even recognize them. I had my wife's at the dealer for service (39K miles) and none of the 9x6/9x7 buyers even had a clue what it was.
There is a 968 owner in our local PCA region and a big plus over the 964 is that he can fit his track wheels inside the car, impossible in the 964 (unless you want zero visibility and nothing else in the car), I tried.
#21
Super Moderator
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Needs More Cowbell
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Even before the 993, Harm liked the look enough to put it on the factory slantnose 964 Turbo:
http://www.flachbau.com/1994s.html
IMHO, the most beautiful 911 EVER produced.
Also FWIW, IIRC, rennlist members Jack Olsen (911) and Dave Swenson (968) carry 4 tires on roof racks attached to the rain gutters. There have been pictures posted on rennlist.
http://www.flachbau.com/1994s.html
IMHO, the most beautiful 911 EVER produced.
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
Also FWIW, IIRC, rennlist members Jack Olsen (911) and Dave Swenson (968) carry 4 tires on roof racks attached to the rain gutters. There have been pictures posted on rennlist.
#22
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Chris M.
There is a 968 owner in our local PCA region and a big plus over the 964 is that he can fit his track wheels inside the car, impossible in the 964 (unless you want zero visibility and nothing else in the car), I tried.
There is a guy at our autocross events that comes in a 993TT and he fits his wheels inside the 993 and it uses larger wheels so they should fit in a 964. Although I would not attempt it myself.
#23
Drifting
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Dallas/FortWorth Texas
Posts: 3,438
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I know this is blasphemy on Rennlist and is certainly off topic, but if I were spending what a nice low mileage 968 or 944 turbo costs, I might be looking hard at a BMW M Coupe as an alternative. You can get a 99 or 00 model for high teens to low 20's. Again, just personal preference. They are a blast to drive. Little hot rods with gobs of tire scorching low end torque from a 3.2 straight six. Zero to 60 in 5.2 seconds. Or, if you are into ragtops, get the roadster version which can be found for probably even less money (roadsters are more common). Of course, I would still take my RS America over the BMW any day.
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
#24
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by TR6
I know this is blasphemy on Rennlist and is certainly off topic, but if I were spending what a nice low mileage 968 or 944 turbo costs, I might be looking hard at a BMW M Coupe as an alternative. You can get a 99 or 00 model for high teens to low 20's. Again, just personal preference. They are a blast to drive. Little hot rods with gobs of tire scorching low end torque from a 3.2 straight six. Zero to 60 in 5.2 seconds. Or, if you are into ragtops, get the roadster version which can be found for probably even less money (roadsters are more common). Of course, I would still take my RS America over the BMW any day. ![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
Your right is is BLASPHEMY!!!
![evilgrin](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/evilgrin.gif)
Just kidding. Actually the M coupe is sweet little toy and can do some serious damage at autocross events.
#25
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I read the article and the only thing that came as a surprise was the assertion that they're in the somehow in the same price bracket. Maybe I'm off, but I think you need at least $22k to get a nice, normal mileage 964 coupe, while you need no more than $15k to buy a 968 coupe in comparable condition with comparable mileage. I also think that, consistent with other non-911 Porsches, the 968 will continue to depreciate to zero while 964 prices will continue to hold firm or even appreciate.
#26
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JJJMCD
I read the article and the only thing that came as a surprise was the assertion that they're in the somehow in the same price bracket. Maybe I'm off, but I think you need at least $22k to get a nice, normal mileage 964 coupe, while you need no more than $15k to buy a 968 coupe in comparable condition with comparable mileage. I also think that, consistent with other non-911 Porsches, the 968 will continue to depreciate to zero while 964 prices will continue to hold firm or even appreciate.