Scantool Diagnostic Interface Results Thread
#31
Instructor
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pretoria, South Africa
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Here are my test results. I am using Andy W's interface with an old desktop PC in my garage. I converted the temp readings to °C in the scantool.cfg file.
I ran the adaptation process, and scantool says the adaptation has been completed, but I noticed very little before/after difference, if anything at all. Since my car is an option 150 car (no O2 sensor, no cat), I suspect there is nothing to adapt in the DME, but I cannot be sure.
I ran the adaptation process, and scantool says the adaptation has been completed, but I noticed very little before/after difference, if anything at all. Since my car is an option 150 car (no O2 sensor, no cat), I suspect there is nothing to adapt in the DME, but I cannot be sure.
#32
Rennlist Member
Anyone else willing to post results?
#34
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by Danz C4
Yes, just got my interface working this evening. Give me a day or two to get some numbers.
Danz C4
Danz C4
Last edited by 911Urge; 10-27-2006 at 07:49 PM.
#35
The graphs have limited utility without the load variable (AFM/MAS), e.g. injection time which
is totally meaningless.
Basically, the graphs need to be three dimensional.
"I ran the adaptation process, and scantool says the adaptation has been completed, but I noticed very little before/after difference, if anything at all. Since my car is an option 150 car (no O2 sensor, no cat), I suspect there is nothing to adapt in the DME, but I cannot be sure."
It only affects the DME idle values.
is totally meaningless.
Basically, the graphs need to be three dimensional.
"I ran the adaptation process, and scantool says the adaptation has been completed, but I noticed very little before/after difference, if anything at all. Since my car is an option 150 car (no O2 sensor, no cat), I suspect there is nothing to adapt in the DME, but I cannot be sure."
It only affects the DME idle values.
#36
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pasadena, MD - Land of Taxes
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
Stephen... Very interesting... In particular the ingnition advance graph. I wonder though if these graphs and numbers can be skewed a little. I would think that it matters how steadily the idle was held at the time the screen shot was taken. For instance if the idle was coming down at the time the screen shot was taken it would be different than if the idle was going up. Would the advance #s be affected that much? Why is mine almost a straight line while Jaime's and yours are different?
#37
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pasadena, MD - Land of Taxes
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
I have another question for those who know... When you first start up ScanTool and click Test Outputs you get this...
When I click OK it doesn't appear to do anything... I get nothing... The box just dissappears. Does anyone know what is happening when this is clicked? Or am I doing this correctly?
When I click OK it doesn't appear to do anything... I get nothing... The box just dissappears. Does anyone know what is happening when this is clicked? Or am I doing this correctly?
#39
Rennlist Member
I have updated my graphs (prior post above) since I performed a much better collection of data today. Indeed I did need to hold the accelerator steady at the time of capure. The graphs may have limited value but it will allow others to see how their values compare to these in the event something is way off.
#42
Intermediate
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Clarkston, MI
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, here are my numbers........ I do not know how to attach images so I'll just report out on a table.
RPM Ignition AFM Injection
Idle 0.8 1.39 3.30
1000 7.0 1.30 2.40
2000 30.0 1.76 1.90
3000 45.5 2.10 1.95
4000 46.3 2.50 2.00
Happy Friday!
RPM Ignition AFM Injection
Idle 0.8 1.39 3.30
1000 7.0 1.30 2.40
2000 30.0 1.76 1.90
3000 45.5 2.10 1.95
4000 46.3 2.50 2.00
Happy Friday!
#43
Originally Posted by Heirsh
I'll do this tomorrow after i get my tires on my car. I may have to use my camera to take stills of the screen, but I'll get it done.
#44
Burgled
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by hawk911
Can you "print screen" the PC at the time, or doesn't that work on this software?
#45
hmm. I'll try that. Its an old win 95 1992 technology laptop. No actually I think I put 98 on it not too long ago.
I was thinking I'd just set up my camera to video it and I can pull the frames out needed.
I havent thought baout this to know how much use it will be, but it wont hurt to add some more data to your stuff. Tires are going on now.
Tirerack is closing out of potenzas for the 16 in wheels if anyone is interested. Real cheap.
I was thinking I'd just set up my camera to video it and I can pull the frames out needed.
I havent thought baout this to know how much use it will be, but it wont hurt to add some more data to your stuff. Tires are going on now.
Tirerack is closing out of potenzas for the 16 in wheels if anyone is interested. Real cheap.