Impending Clutch of DMF Failure?
#16
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No I wouldnt change the starter ring, unless it showed evidence of wear that would cause your starter to begin missing at some point. But I would change the DMF.
I just dont trust rubber centered pieces to last...
Kirk
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
I just dont trust rubber centered pieces to last...
Kirk
#18
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by RallyDogRacing
So does anyone have a used Luk DMF they would like to purge from their bin-of-parts? ... Would you have considered the starter ring a "must replace" or a "might as well"?
![Cheers](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/beerchug.gif)
Last edited by JasonAndreas; 06-07-2006 at 12:13 AM.
#19
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sorry to hijack, but I am looking at 964s, both C2 and C4, and would like to know more about DMF.
Can anyone post what are the issues.
Also, if I understand this thread correctly, service records that show clutch replacement does not neccesarily means that the DMF was also replaced. Corect?
Did all 964s use the DMF? Is there a difference between C2 and C4?
What about 90-91 vs 92-93?
Agaian, sorry for the hijack, but information would be appreciated.
Nader
Can anyone post what are the issues.
Also, if I understand this thread correctly, service records that show clutch replacement does not neccesarily means that the DMF was also replaced. Corect?
Did all 964s use the DMF? Is there a difference between C2 and C4?
What about 90-91 vs 92-93?
Agaian, sorry for the hijack, but information would be appreciated.
Nader
#20
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sorry to hijack, but I am looking at 964s, both C2 and C4, and would like to know more about DMF.
Can anyone post what are the issues.
Also, if I understand this thread correctly, service records that show clutch replacement does not neccesarily means that the DMF was also replaced. Corect?
Did all 964s use the DMF? Is there a difference between C2 and C4?
What about 90-91 vs 92-93?
Agaian, sorry for the hijack, but information would be appreciated.
Nader
Can anyone post what are the issues.
Also, if I understand this thread correctly, service records that show clutch replacement does not neccesarily means that the DMF was also replaced. Corect?
Did all 964s use the DMF? Is there a difference between C2 and C4?
What about 90-91 vs 92-93?
Agaian, sorry for the hijack, but information would be appreciated.
Nader
It's correct that a clutch replacement doesn't mean the DMF was replaced - but that will be because it wasn't worn and didn't need to be. I just had a clutch replaced - I was told my DMF had 30-40K miles left in it.
89 C4s didn't use a DMF. The rest did.
In summary - if I was buying a 964 I would care more about whether it had recently had a clutch / whether it would soon need a clutch (which is a relatively expensive consumable) than whether it still had the original DMF which occasionally failed (but seems to have lasted 13-16 years in the car I was viewing).
Hope this helps.
#21
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Nader Fotouhi
Is there a difference between C2 and C4? What about 90-91 vs 92-93?
#22
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well thank you all for the input. I've made a decision to first do the timing-belt R&R on my supercharged 4Runner, so if I find something ugly while working on the 964, I don't have any other impending issues to deal with on the driving vehicle.
I'm going to dive in and do the clutch and anything I can get to seal & gasket wise. I'm leaving the heads & cyls on and going to try to make it past the 200k mile mark because I take a certain amount of joy in getting the most usage I can out of something before rebuilding it. It will probably be a couple weeks before I get started on this.
I'll still gladly pickup someone's used LUK DMF in the meantime.
I'm going to dive in and do the clutch and anything I can get to seal & gasket wise. I'm leaving the heads & cyls on and going to try to make it past the 200k mile mark because I take a certain amount of joy in getting the most usage I can out of something before rebuilding it. It will probably be a couple weeks before I get started on this.
I'll still gladly pickup someone's used LUK DMF in the meantime.
#24
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Good point on the starter ring. I suppose it shouldn't really be on the list.
Kirk
p.s. Heads arrived today. New guides, valves, valve springs, retainers, machined for sealing ring, etc.
Kirk
p.s. Heads arrived today. New guides, valves, valve springs, retainers, machined for sealing ring, etc.