Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

964 Performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-24-2005, 05:57 PM
  #16  
Dunasso
Burning Brakes
 
Dunasso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mark, I'm sure that the plastic manifold could be fitted to an earlier 964s 3.6. However, I am unsure of what would be necessary for the swap, other than the manifold itself. I had a 90 964 C4 with an aluminum intake system, but never thought to look at the differences other than the noticable difference between aluminum and plastic. I have literal technical data on the various reasond why they made the change and some of the performance benefits, but nothing on what it would take to make the swap.

Duncan
Old 02-24-2005, 06:19 PM
  #17  
Marc Shaw
Super Duper Moderator
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Marc Shaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: YQU
Posts: 7,774
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

I guess that is something to ask when I get to the OPC in the spring -- extra air intake is one thing but I think the weight reduction might be of more importance.

Not wanting to re-open the whole GTech thread, what is the optimal driving technique to get the best 0-60 times? I have ordered a GTech Pro and plan to delay/reverse any mods until I can do some baseline runs then do more runs as I add back bits (stock, cup airbox, G-pipe, etc) to really see how the changes make a difference (like Joey Bagabagels did -- ). I know the GTech is no dyno but it should be fairly consistent with itself assuming atmospheric conditions are similar. Rev to 6000 rpm and dump the clutch sounds harsh but might be needed so it does not bog down being a C4. Any thoughts?

Marc
Old 02-24-2005, 10:29 PM
  #18  
bhensarl
Jarhead
Rennlist Member

 
bhensarl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Del Mar, CA
Posts: 1,440
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think you're going to put a whole bunch of wear on your clutch if you do that. But if you don't mind that, or you're planning on replacing it soon anyway, go for it!
Brian
Old 02-24-2005, 10:39 PM
  #19  
Doug H
Nordschleife Master
 
Doug H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Destin, Nashville, In a 458 Challenge
Posts: 5,128
Received 904 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

I was getting around 4.6 to 4.8 with 245 hp to the wheels and 242 torque to the wheels with my 90 cab. My G-Techs are posted if someone wants to search for them.
Old 02-24-2005, 10:41 PM
  #20  
Marc Shaw
Super Duper Moderator
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Marc Shaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: YQU
Posts: 7,774
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bhensarl
I think you're going to put a whole bunch of wear on your clutch if you do that. But if you don't mind that, or you're planning on replacing it soon anyway, go for it!
Brian

Umm...I wasn't suggesting that would be the best way but was asking what WOULD be the best way.

Thanks.

(I like my clutch.. ).

Last edited by Marc Shaw; 02-25-2005 at 10:46 AM.
Old 02-25-2005, 12:02 AM
  #21  
garrett376
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
garrett376's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 7,385
Received 597 Likes on 459 Posts
Default

Hi Doug H!! Good to see you around again!!!
Old 02-25-2005, 12:33 AM
  #22  
Dunasso
Burning Brakes
 
Dunasso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Those Gtecs are the rage. I have considered a Gtec but it's not that high on priority list if you know what I mean.

Duncan
Old 02-25-2005, 12:43 AM
  #23  
Kahdmus
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Kahdmus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pacifica CA.
Posts: 3,851
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

DOUG H!!!!! Welcome back...I was getting worried!
Old 02-25-2005, 07:25 AM
  #24  
leosayer
Racer
 
leosayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: London England
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There are some very cheap G-Techs on ebay at the moment, although they look to be an older model.
Old 02-25-2005, 09:17 AM
  #25  
Doug&Julie
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Doug&Julie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Beave, OR
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drew_K
I believe the factory 0 to 60 number for a 964 C2 is 5.5 secs. Most magazine tests have been in the low 5 second range. A great source for this info is the 911 Gold Portfolio for 1990-1997. It has magazine reviews of 911's from those years, including performance numbers, and can be bought from Amazon.com.

Here's the link: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/AS...381916-9034535
That's a nice resource. Of all the books I check on the most, it's these "portfolio" books with articles from around the world (but mostly US and UK). I have some from the earlier cars, too. I consider them a "must have" for the library.
Old 02-25-2005, 10:45 AM
  #26  
Marc Shaw
Super Duper Moderator
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Marc Shaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: YQU
Posts: 7,774
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by leosayer
There are some very cheap G-Techs on ebay at the moment, although they look to be an older model.
I think the ones on EBay are older Pro and Competition models. if you look at the GTech web site they are circa 1994/2001 and are no longer available.

Marc
Old 02-25-2005, 03:42 PM
  #27  
Doug H
Nordschleife Master
 
Doug H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Destin, Nashville, In a 458 Challenge
Posts: 5,128
Received 904 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

Hey guys. Thanks for the welcome. I have been lurking off and on.
Old 03-02-2005, 05:26 AM
  #28  
Chris 911
Advanced
 
Chris 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 53
Received 22 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

The main reason for the difference in 0-60 times from factory is also how the different companies test these times. I have read somewhere that Porsche has 2 people in the car, and a full tank as they measure 0-60 times, but have read measurements of standard C2s in magasines as low as 5.1.

I could at least feel a great difference when I changed to RS-clutch and flywheel, as the response in acceleration was completely different. The RS also weight 7 kg less than the standard dual mass item. This is a great investment to any 964.

Has anyone experienced the rear wheels "jumping" for traction like I have? I saw a documentary of the modification of the "Elanor" Mustang Shelby, and that they fitted a support to avoid the rear wheels from doing this, any experience on this matter? Unlike many other cars, the 911 has incredible amounts of traction due to the weight over the rear wheels. A friend of mine made a joke about this after we had a drive in a Jag XKR, which at hard acceleration would spin on the rear wheels, (with smoke and the sound effects of a real burnout) whereas mine would be jumping seeming that the rear wheels had a lot more traction.
Old 03-03-2005, 12:24 AM
  #29  
Colin 90 C2
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Colin 90 C2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Delaware
Posts: 977
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Chris,
What wheels are you running?
I found that with the stock 16's, I could easily break loose the rear end, but with the 17's I really need to put in a lot of effort.
Old 03-03-2005, 12:32 AM
  #30  
Doug H
Nordschleife Master
 
Doug H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Destin, Nashville, In a 458 Challenge
Posts: 5,128
Received 904 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

I could smoke mine with no problems with 18 inch speedlines. I would also get some hop occassionally.


Quick Reply: 964 Performance



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:41 PM.