When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Thanks—sounds like you were in an environment that was worlds away from production cars. A good friend had a business running EDM Wire machines that dealt with the kind of tolerances you describe.
All the JE pistons needed a little massaging. Should be a fun engine and car when it’s finished.
I think we're hung up on tolerances and balancing an engine. I've never thought the two to be the same. Tolerances= actual measurements, versus balancing= making all parts match.
I wouldn’t say worlds away. My parts were mostly used on helicopters instead of cars. Blackhawk, Seahawk, Super Stallion. Chinook etc. i did do vintage restoration parts used on some significant pebble beach winning cars. But those were copies i made using the original parts. No tolerances just close.
As a first tier supplier i was what they called their sliced bread shop. Small quantities and usually very complex and detailed parts mostly with tight tolerances. The mass produced parts were made by the big guys. I was the closest thing to rapid prototype back in the day. Usually mass produced parts weren’t healed to the tolerances of my parts. Or their scrap rate was significantly higher than my 2%.
i would put the connecting rod manufacture on the same level as the larger shops. My parts would be more like the vintage custom special wishes parts.
I think we're hung up on tolerances and balancing an engine. I've never thought the two to be the same. Tolerances= actual measurements, versus balancing= making all parts match.
From my background, tolerances are an allowable amount of variation of a specified quantity in the dimensions of a machine or part. Balancing these tolerances in a dynamic calculation such as an engine, not only in theory but in reality is critical to the engineering parameters of the original design of that particular equation. I.e the closer you can be to what was engineered, by limiting that variance in parts selected, and correct assembly of aforementioned parts will yield the intended outcome of the engineering design. That difference between theory and reality is the error. The closer we can get to theory with our assembly process, we may improve the harmonics. Harmonics disrupt the smoothness of operation. That is why people harmonically balance their crankshaft for smoother operation. As you can see there are many variables that go into this, and we haven't even touched on fluid-structure interaction, which is a science in of itself... So to retort to your statement, tolerances and limiting harmonics are both variables that are part of a bigger engineering equation...
I think we're hung up on tolerances and balancing an engine. I've never thought the two to be the same. Tolerances= actual measurements, versus balancing= making all parts match.
yes and no. Measurements are measurements the part is designed and built to. Tolerances are the variation (deviation) those measurements are allowed and still be within spec. You can balance most any part. That is why we are saying pauter carillo etc are balance and matched with a tight tolerance vs what the factory supplied in the 90’s.
Porsche has continued to reduce weight and tighten tolerances compared to the original engines internals. The tolerances of the day limited their ability to maximize power. They learned this with the RS which used the lightest closer tolerance internals. Therefore IMO they go hand in hand. As they progressed changing (tightening) tolerances and reducing weight improved engine efficiency and power output. Today we have the ability to manufacture on a level we couldn’t do economically back in the 90’s.
yes and no. Measurements are measurements the part is designed and built to. Tolerances are the variation (deviation) those measurements are allowed and still be within spec. You can balance most any part. That is why we are saying pauter carillo etc are balance and matched with a tight tolerance vs what the factory supplied in the 90’s.
Porsche has continued to reduce weight and tighten tolerances compared to the original engines internals. The tolerances of the day limited their ability to maximize power. They learned this with the RS which used the lightest closer tolerance internals. Therefore IMO they go hand in hand. As they progressed changing (tightening) tolerances and reducing weight improved engine efficiency and power output. Today we have the ability to manufacture on a level we couldn’t do economically back in the 90’s.
Agreed... In a mathematical sense A + B = C, although A and B are "different" variables in this simple equation, doesn't negate the fact that they are both "variables" in general.
Trying to do this in a moving train on my phone is tough. But i guess i should say dimensions vs measurements. Trying to keep it basic.
Correct. Dimensions are the physical size of an object. A Measurement Error (also called Observational Error) is the difference between a measured quantity and its true value. This value needs to be within the specified tolerance of said variable. Such as the example of the rods. (not on a moving train)
I agree there are a number of excellent products out there it all depends on what you are trying to achieve. Although @Spyerx Which Ti rods did yo use? I know the Cup car rods have a limited life expectancy.
In race applications they all do (every part on a cup car has a time out/rebuild schedule). These are from the street car but it's possible the part number is the same, i'm not sure.
I think on a street car the Ti rods are awesome and I wouldn't worry about the time element. Race cars I believe was 40 hours, but most (with limited $$$) were going well beyond and motors still looked good.
Talos Takes Your 991 Porsche 911 GT3 to the Next Level for a Cool $1.13 Million
Slideshow: Talos Vehicles has transformed the Porsche 911 GT3 RS into a carbon-bodied, race-inspired machine that costs well over $1 million before the donor car is even included.
9 Vehicles Porsche Helped Engineer that Aren't Porsches
Slideshow: Long before engineering consulting became trendy, Porsche was quietly helping other automakers build everything from supercars to economy hatchbacks.
9 Features and Characteristics That Only Porsche People Understand
Slideshow: Some brands build cars. Porsche builds traditions, obsessions, and a few habits that stopped making sense decades ago but somehow became part of the charm.
This Builder Is Turning Heads With Its Slantnose 911 Creation
Slideshow: A small Polish tuner has reimagined the Porsche 911 Slantnose for the modern era, blending 1980s nostalgia with widebody tuning culture and serious performance upgrades.
Porsche 911 GT3 Artisan Edition Pays Homage to Japanese Culture
Slideshow: Porsche has created a Japan-only 911 GT3 Artisan Edition that blends track-ready hardware with design cues inspired by traditional Japanese craftsmanship.
Porsche Reveals Coupe Variant of the Electric Cayenne With a Fresh Look
Slideshow: Porsche's latest electric Cayenne Coupe blends dramatic styling with supercar acceleration, turning the brand's midsize SUV into a 1,139-horsepower flagship.