Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Piston - cylinder clearance too tight?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-09-2015, 04:58 AM
  #1  
bebbetufs
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
bebbetufs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,117
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Piston - cylinder clearance too tight?

The block I'm building up is brand new so the cylinders are very close to 100mm. One of my pistons only gives me 0.008mm clearance when measured according to the manual. The piston came from a running 62k miles engine which had no damage to the skirt or the cylinder walls

According to the manual this is the minimum clearance. Still, is it enough?

The minimum clearance is interesting, it indicates extremely similar expansion rates for the cylinders and the pistons.

I mic'ed the piston and transferred the measurment to my bore indicator. I repeatedly get a pointers width less than 0.01mm.
Old 03-09-2015, 08:52 AM
  #2  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,255
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

It has been posted here about the tolerance groups of blocks and pistons, I think it was something like 0, 1 and 2. Can you measure the block the pistons came out of ? I may be a little wary about the condition of the coating on a used piston in a new block with tight clearances.
Old 03-09-2015, 12:32 PM
  #3  
bebbetufs
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
bebbetufs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,117
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Both blocks are tolerance group 1. The one they aim for when machining and the most common.
Old 03-09-2015, 04:43 PM
  #4  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,255
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

If I had a brand new block I would have put a new set of Wossners in it.
Old 03-09-2015, 11:57 PM
  #5  
Dare
Rennlist Member
 
Dare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 449
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Any chance it's a measurement error? I found if I held the frame of the mic with my bare hand while I was transferring the measurement to the bore indicator the heat from my hand would skew the result. Essentially it makes the mic expand which sets the zero point on the gauge too big, making the clearance seem smaller.
Old 03-10-2015, 04:28 AM
  #6  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

It is interesting how little temp difference makes all the difference. My pistons didn't even fit the bores because pistons were indoor and block in car trunk.

8 microns is a bit tight for turbo application I think.
Old 03-10-2015, 10:15 AM
  #7  
Ski
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Ski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Heber Springs, AR
Posts: 7,897
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I agree, I would not run that tight for me. Factory was .020mm new? The last few engines I've done I've been running .0012" or .030mm with the Mahle slipper skirt ferroprint coating. Good luck with what you decide.
Old 03-10-2015, 02:05 PM
  #8  
bebbetufs
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
bebbetufs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,117
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

The other three are at 0.012mm clearance. They are worn pistons so it seems odd, but I get the same result with two different mics and two different bore indicators. The temp in the garage was 18degrees C.

I don't think I can buy a new set of pistons now, and still make the start of the season. I have a few other pistons I can look at, but this set has been balances to 0.1 grammes.

I hate the constant setbacks.....
Old 03-10-2015, 07:29 PM
  #9  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,255
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Maybe you have to hone/lap a little out of one cylinder then, I believe there is possible variation in each tolerance group anyway.
Old 03-10-2015, 07:46 PM
  #10  
bebbetufs
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
bebbetufs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,117
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I have the lapping paste, but I was under the impression it will only remove the aluminium between the silica crystals. I may be mistaken but I think one needs a special diamond stone cutter to actually cut the silica.
Old 03-10-2015, 08:05 PM
  #11  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,255
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

You would have to lightly hone the cylinder to increase the clearance and then lap with the paste.

Last edited by blade7; 03-10-2015 at 08:48 PM.
Old 03-10-2015, 08:11 PM
  #12  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 648 Likes on 409 Posts
Default

It can be honed with regular CBN inserts, but it will only work if olive oil is used for lubrication.

http://www.enginebuildermag.com/2008...and-abrasives/

The problem with using CBN to mill aluminum is that aluminum tends to stick to CBN and leave a smeared finish. As with grinding, this can be minimized by spraying a lubricant on the surface of the metal. Ordinary olive oil works well for this purpose, as does furniture polish, WD-40 or specialty lubricants for machining aluminum.
Old 03-10-2015, 08:30 PM
  #13  
Dare
Rennlist Member
 
Dare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 449
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I believe that's right. The change in diameter from the lapping process is miniscule, less than .001mm. You'll need to hone the cylinders to change the clearance. And from what I've read this does require a specific type of stone, along with a particular honing speed and angle.
Old 03-10-2015, 10:11 PM
  #14  
Ski
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Ski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Heber Springs, AR
Posts: 7,897
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The manual is specific with the cut, hone, Finish - the last which IIRC, is done with Felt pad and the paste on the last pass.

Now, not smoke and mirrors but, I was also told a long time ago by a guy who actually did some time at the factory engine shop, that the last of the 944/968/928 cylinder finish process was the chrome plated Porsche rings actually completed the very LAST finish of the Alusil bores. Microscopically, the Alusil, even after the paste and pads, left an unfinished bore, where the piston rings flattened the exposed Alusil and fully seated it all together. ?? who knows but his advice has served us well so far.

I can tell you that if you have a shop here in the US that you don't fully trust, Duffin Engine service in San Antonio knows Alusil and the process if you can afford to ship and return. We've gone a tiny amount over stock clearance with past builds just to give a small window for thermal expansion, because - even good engine shops may not have the tolerance that Porsche did at the factory. So far so good...

Nice little exert from Sunnen
http://www.sunnen.com/NewsDetails.aspx?NewsID=11
Old 03-11-2015, 05:35 AM
  #15  
bebbetufs
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
bebbetufs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Norway
Posts: 1,117
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Problem is I live in Norway, and there are no such shops in this area. Besides. The price would equal having sleeves installed in the US, so I'm not going that route.

I'll double check my measurements and check my spare pistons as well.

Does anyone have one good turbo piston group 1, and very close to 99.990mm Ø?


Quick Reply: Piston - cylinder clearance too tight?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:18 PM.