Looking for dyno results for Guru MAF vs. ...
#1
Racer
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Looking for dyno results for Guru MAF vs. ...
Does anyone have superimposed or side by side dyno results for a 951 with the GURU MAF kit running 15 psi vs. a slightly modified 951 (running APE or similar aftermarket chips and 15 psi boost)?
I would love to get rid of the AFM flapper door, but want to see how much torque and power I'll be getting for my hard earned dinero. TIA!
I would love to get rid of the AFM flapper door, but want to see how much torque and power I'll be getting for my hard earned dinero. TIA!
#2
Race Director
Here's the usual results @15psi:
EuroProducts chips: 200rwhp & 220lb-ft TQ
AutoThority chips: 220rwhp & 230lb-ft TQ
GURU chips: 230-235rwhp & 250lb-ft TQ
GURU MAP-1/2: 260-270rwhp & 290-305lb-ft TQ
There's some dyno-charts of these upgrades on our GURU Forums in the DynoCharts sections. You can also search these forums for various charts as well. I gotta re-link all the broken threads in our Testimonials section from users who've upgraded from APE chips to GURU Chips and/or MAP upprades.
But peak HP/TQ figures can be misleading. What really gives a car much more punch is the width and flatness of the torque curve. We've worked very hard at tuning to provide the widest and most usable powerband possible. A lot of the intentional turbo-lag inthe stock programming has been eliminated and gives these cars instant response down low, which won't show up on dyno figures.
(back to re-linking broken threads...)
EuroProducts chips: 200rwhp & 220lb-ft TQ
AutoThority chips: 220rwhp & 230lb-ft TQ
GURU chips: 230-235rwhp & 250lb-ft TQ
GURU MAP-1/2: 260-270rwhp & 290-305lb-ft TQ
There's some dyno-charts of these upgrades on our GURU Forums in the DynoCharts sections. You can also search these forums for various charts as well. I gotta re-link all the broken threads in our Testimonials section from users who've upgraded from APE chips to GURU Chips and/or MAP upprades.
But peak HP/TQ figures can be misleading. What really gives a car much more punch is the width and flatness of the torque curve. We've worked very hard at tuning to provide the widest and most usable powerband possible. A lot of the intentional turbo-lag inthe stock programming has been eliminated and gives these cars instant response down low, which won't show up on dyno figures.
(back to re-linking broken threads...)