Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Any past or present E39 m5 owners

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2013, 12:22 AM
  #16  
KaiKai951S
Instructor
 
KaiKai951S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I totlly agree with Greg East. After owning to e32's they are great cars. Even better I would suggest an e38 740i. Plenty of power,a great daily driver. and cheap enough to keep the 951 as well
Old 09-04-2013, 07:49 AM
  #17  
manticore33
Racer
 
manticore33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thought this was an interesting diagram of the e39 bus systems:



And that would be late 90's integration. I am curious to see how much more items have been linked in newer BMWs or cars in general.
Old 09-04-2013, 12:28 PM
  #18  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by robstah
The BMW V8s are iffy at best and can be maintenance nightmares.
The S62 I helped set up for drift events has been running troublefree and very strong for more than a year now, putting down 500 hp and 540 ft.lbs. It wasn't even opened prior to being turbocharged. FWIW anyway.
Old 09-04-2013, 04:22 PM
  #19  
993GT
Rennlist Member
 
993GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,745
Received 545 Likes on 331 Posts
Default

two very different cars, one can't replace the other. E39 M5 is a wonderful car, tons of torque, smooth as silk at any speed, parts are reasonable outside the dealer(like the 951). Unlike what some others have said, the V8's are great engine, just need to keep up on preventative maintenance(again, like 951). IIRC, 2001-2003 S62's only need standard 5w30. M5 is only E39 with a LSD. I6 engine's are great on gas and buttery smooth, sometimes can't tell if even running, but really lack power.
Old 09-04-2013, 05:05 PM
  #20  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 646 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cheburator
The E39 M5 will see 182mph and 0-100 in 4.9sec, and will carry 5 in comfort to the Nurburgring, then lap the Nordschleife in the mid 8s stock and then go home again. Sounds like a **** car, no?

Sport car, 951 is better, it feels like a sports car, where e39 m5 feels like a fat cow on steroids, and steering is complete junk compared to rack&pinon found in 6 bangers.

It was a very good car in its own right, but today 80% of these cars need big maintenance, or are rust buckets. It is not even close to 944 or 911 in resistance to time.
Old 09-04-2013, 05:09 PM
  #21  
Voith
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Voith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 8,385
Received 646 Likes on 408 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by manticore33
Hahahahaha... I heard of baking them apart or cutting the lights to replace the adjusters, but SAUNA?
Combining work and pleasure, has never felt hotter

My girl would kill me if she'd see this.
Old 09-04-2013, 06:07 PM
  #22  
993GT
Rennlist Member
 
993GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 6,745
Received 545 Likes on 331 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Voith
and steering is complete junk compared to rack&pinon found in 6 bangers.
+1, the 6 cyl. model have WAY better steering feel, perfect e39 IMO would be a 530 body with M3 E46 engine (S54) and M5 or other LSD differential swapped in
Old 09-05-2013, 02:19 PM
  #23  
blodstrupmoen
Pro
 
blodstrupmoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 61 dg 46min
Posts: 647
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Scott H
The worst thing about E39 M5s are previous owners (just like the 951), almost all the ones I've looked at have been run into the ground, just like most early 2000 BMWs at this point. They are great cars, but remember they were $70-80k when new and replacement parts are priced accordingly. The E39 chassis is fantastic and somehow pulls off this amazing trick where the car feels much smaller than it is when you drive it.

right on .

As a present e39 m5 owner I know that as a daily driver the M5 is miles ahead of the 951. It is a very good car , ofcourse it cannot compare to the mighty E34 straight six , but it is a easy car to live with and it would not cost you much to run . ( you live in the US and petrol is almost free anyway )

Ofcourse this only applies if the car has been well maintained by previous owner.
Old 09-08-2013, 04:08 AM
  #24  
black944 turbo
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
black944 turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,258
Received 29 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

Thank you all for your responses. This thread has helped decide to hold onto the 951 as it would defeat the purpose of why I would buy the m 5 to have both cars.
Old 09-08-2013, 11:19 AM
  #25  
jdantuono
Intermediate
 
jdantuono's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does it have to be an E39?
Honestly... I'd just get a 4 door E36 M3.
Maintenance is super cheap & mostly DIY.
Gas mileage is surprisingly good, and it feels similar to 951.
Old 09-08-2013, 04:10 PM
  #26  
black944 turbo
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
black944 turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,258
Received 29 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

I thought about the e36 m 3 as well, but again not a lot of room.
Old 09-13-2013, 03:22 AM
  #27  
Droops83
Three Wheelin'
 
Droops83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,664
Received 76 Likes on 64 Posts
Default

Since I work on both for a living, I will offer my $0.02:

Both are expensive cars to maintain, especially if you are paying someone to work on them. I would say that the M5 is more expensive to maintain overall due to the increased amount of electronics that can fail, the fact that you need to invest in some sort of scan equipment to diagnose/repair, and consumables like engine oil, gear oil and brakes are very expensive. Yes, I know that BMW "approved" their normal 5W-30 oil for '01 and up, but they only redesigned the piston rings. The rest of the engine, including all of the VANOS gear, is optimized for the proper and expensive 10W-60.

The M5 engine is essentially a highly strung race engine that is detuned and has double VANOS added on the give it tractability for street use and to give it some hope for passable fuel economy and to meet emissions standards. It needs to be maintained as such. The potential issues with the VANOS system are well documented by now and can be expensive.

Perhaps the biggest issue with the S62 engine is that the original valve guide material is too soft as in Porsche's 993, and premature valve guide wear can result, especially in cars that were originally puttered around town and/or not maintained properly. The first symptom is clogged secondary air passages in the heads, which causes "check engine" lights and is a big issue in smog-controlled states like mine. We have done several valve jobs on these engines for this issue and for burnt exhaust valves causing misfires.

I know it sounds like I'm ragging on the M5, but it is in fact my dream daily driver. It is a fantastic car, and incredibly fun to drive for such a heavy vehicle. The throttle response is amazing, the sound is great, and the shifter is slick and the LSD amazing. It handles well for its size and is immensely stable at speed.

It is a very different car from the 951, and I am merely cautioning anyone looking into one. BMW had implemented its crazy 15K mile oil change intervals by the time they released this car, so even one that is "well maintained" by dealer standards is under-maintained. Luckily, many are in the hands of enthusiasts now who hopefully take better care of them.

I strongly urge anyone looking at one of these to get a comprehensive PPI by a good BMW shop. PM me and I can likely point you to a good one in your area. Most of you on this board are at least somewhat technically inclined and DIYers and could handle much of the normal maintenance work on the E39 M5, but I feel that a regular E39 would likely be a better fit for a daily driver for most.
Old 09-13-2013, 09:30 AM
  #28  
EVOMMM
Rennlist Member
 
EVOMMM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: NY NY
Posts: 3,967
Received 1,543 Likes on 910 Posts
Default

The BMW is a great car BUT! it is a high performance and expensive parts to maintain it but tell which Porsche from same era that's not
like the saying goes "speed cost money, how fast do you want to go"
Mike
Old 11-12-2014, 07:22 PM
  #29  
clubracer6
Rennlist Member
 
clubracer6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dundee, IL (Chicago)
Posts: 878
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Hope I don't upset anyone for bringing this back up, but found it to be interesting.

Looking for a new toy and narrowed it down to a e39 M5 or an 89 951. A NC mx5 that I would super charge is 3rd. E36 And e46 m3's are tied for 4th. My cap is 15k including any needed work after purchase. It's really a great time to be a car guy regardless of budget.

Yes the 951 and M5 are very different, but both great drivers cars. One a scalpel and the other a mallet, each with their own rewards. I have had an 03 M5 and have always missed it. Made me feel like I was driving at Bathhurst in a super v8 car. Also had a 88 951 had it for 3 years and it was in the shop for 33 of the 36 months I owned it. I have always wanted another go at it but feel like they are more fragile than the e39 M, but this thread would have me believe otherwise.

I feel like I would probably drive the M5 a little more than I would the 951 simply because the m5 is not as special as 89 951. So no bad weather where as the m5 I would throw on some snows and have a riot occasionally.

The 951, just something I always loved them and always wanted one and I feel like now is the time to buy a nice one although my budget will only get me a decent one.

OP- did you ever get the M5?
Old 11-12-2014, 09:39 PM
  #30  
black944 turbo
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
black944 turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 4,258
Received 29 Likes on 20 Posts
Default

I ended up keeping my 951 and I can say that I am very happy I did. This car just keeps getting better with age.

I did drive the M 5 and I liked it a lot, it just was not as special to me. It felt to modern and refined ( I know this is the point of the m5) .


Quick Reply: Any past or present E39 m5 owners



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:48 AM.