Which maf is better LR or M tune
11-18-2011, 03:06 AM
#32
Rennlist Member
Adonay, is that a question or an attempt at dissuasion?
No, there is not a "bug", and never was. The recent idle-code rewrite is simply due to me not being happy with the factory idle code response (mostly only for those with lightweight flywheels). So if the old code was buggy, then you are suggesting that the factory idle-code is buggy.
For the OP, I did not want to enter this thread - as I feel people should make their own decisions based on good info, not propaganda.
No, there is not a "bug", and never was. The recent idle-code rewrite is simply due to me not being happy with the factory idle code response (mostly only for those with lightweight flywheels). So if the old code was buggy, then you are suggesting that the factory idle-code is buggy.
For the OP, I did not want to enter this thread - as I feel people should make their own decisions based on good info, not propaganda.
Thank you for the clarification.
11-29-2011, 12:08 PM
#33
Rennlist Member
I am most impressed with Josh and his products. After starting with the A-tune, I moved up to the M-tune a few months later and haven't looked back. Josh's support is second to none. Thanks Josh.
11-29-2011, 01:34 PM
#34
Nordschleife Master
11-29-2011, 10:02 PM
#35
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
I love my m-tune for it's overall drivability, especially part throttle around town, but I am eagerly awaiting the low altitude E85 cold start fix... Hopefully soon?
11-29-2011, 10:42 PM
#37
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
You guys ain't seen nothing, the light weight lartqua-tune is coming soon
11-29-2011, 11:30 PM
#38
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
11-29-2011, 11:50 PM
#39
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
11-30-2011, 12:03 PM
#41
Burning Brakes
11-30-2011, 05:43 PM
#42
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"If you are gonna tune your 951....GO ROGUE!" you know cuz us 951 guys are rogue, out on the edge, gone off the reservation kind of guys???? 
Josh, I still say that should be your motto or a least a bumper sticker for your company. You don't even have to pay me a royalty. lol
Does anyone else even use the MAP for timing control like Josh does???? I.e true 3D mapping??
Oh, and because it was mentioned earlier and not a new topic, I am considering a lightweight/alum flywheel with my 2.8 swap and noticed you said that causes issues with idle? Should I pass on the flywheel or is it a quick re tune?
Josh, I still say that should be your motto or a least a bumper sticker for your company. You don't even have to pay me a royalty. lol
Does anyone else even use the MAP for timing control like Josh does???? I.e true 3D mapping??
Oh, and because it was mentioned earlier and not a new topic, I am considering a lightweight/alum flywheel with my 2.8 swap and noticed you said that causes issues with idle? Should I pass on the flywheel or is it a quick re tune?
11-30-2011, 06:11 PM
#43
You asked two questions....
Yes. There is another vendor that alters timing based on MAP, and has always altered timing based on MAP if your MAF kit is equipped with the MAP sensor option. Altering *fueling* based on MAP was only recently added functionality, however, with a newly released version of their MAF product. But they always altered timing.
I'm fairly certain Rogue is the only one, until you get into standalone systems.
true 3D mapping??
11-30-2011, 06:12 PM
#44
Three Wheelin'
01-19-2012, 04:33 PM
#45
Rennlist Member
Idle is fine on mine with a 6lb Fidanza F/W and Spec Stage 2+ clutch, even with the a/c compressor engaged.
