already made appointment with lindsey??
05-15-2003, 10:49 PM
#16
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I only have access to a Mustang Dyno, as the only Dyno Jet in the state is 2.5 hours away.
My last dyno, with 52# injectors and Guru K27 v.8b software netted 282 rwhp and 290 torque. I am going to dyno it when I get back home with the 65# and v.8d software, all were/will be at 17psi. I have made a couple of runs around the house with 18psi and my WBO2 pretty much stays the same. I am also going to weigh my car again because the last time we weighed it before dyno we got 2820# with just over 1/2 tank of gas, we input 3000# to the computer to compensate for driver.
So if you add 13% for Mustang - DynoJet difference, you come to 318/327 respectively. I tried the cam and hated it. Changed it one day and put the stock one back in the next. I have good A/F ratios with Guru software; when the car gets on boost around 3600, it is at full boost by 4000 with A/F ratio at/about 11.5-11.6. From there it is a very linear climb to 6200rpm, which is 12.5-12.6! Not to bad still running factory AFM and no fuel control, with the exception of Dannos added fuel in K27v.8d chips.
My last dyno, with 52# injectors and Guru K27 v.8b software netted 282 rwhp and 290 torque. I am going to dyno it when I get back home with the 65# and v.8d software, all were/will be at 17psi. I have made a couple of runs around the house with 18psi and my WBO2 pretty much stays the same. I am also going to weigh my car again because the last time we weighed it before dyno we got 2820# with just over 1/2 tank of gas, we input 3000# to the computer to compensate for driver.
So if you add 13% for Mustang - DynoJet difference, you come to 318/327 respectively. I tried the cam and hated it. Changed it one day and put the stock one back in the next. I have good A/F ratios with Guru software; when the car gets on boost around 3600, it is at full boost by 4000 with A/F ratio at/about 11.5-11.6. From there it is a very linear climb to 6200rpm, which is 12.5-12.6! Not to bad still running factory AFM and no fuel control, with the exception of Dannos added fuel in K27v.8d chips.
05-16-2003, 02:24 AM
#17
Monkeys Removed by Request
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
cool!! are you only loosing 13% on dyno....guys from powerhaus said more like 20% loss with stock clutch,weight,ect... i am hoping for about 320+wrhp and 320+ lb of torque..well will have to see but if its lower than that i am going back to the drawing board for some more parts! i gotta keep up with my friends turbo cobra mustang!Not to mention all of the 996 turbos in the area!
05-16-2003, 09:18 AM
#18
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
No,,,the 13% is the difference between a Mustang Dyno and a Dyno Jet. A Mustang dyno reads lower because it is load bearing vs an accelerometer based dyno as the dyno jet.
What Powerhaus is talking about must be rear wheel hp to flywheel hp. I've always used 15%..I think that is pretty much the "agreed" value around here but opinions do differ.
What Powerhaus is talking about must be rear wheel hp to flywheel hp. I've always used 15%..I think that is pretty much the "agreed" value around here but opinions do differ.
05-16-2003, 05:10 PM
#19
Monkeys Removed by Request
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
got ya! sorry didnt understand where you were getting that 13% from.I talked to wes today cause dave was on the phone...as far as i know everything is still in order for the 31st so i will keep you posted...i just hope i have enough money after vegas!!