Turbo S vs. Ferrari 328: '88 magazine review
05-05-2003 | 08:14 PM
#16
Burning Brakes
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 1
From: Espoo, Finland
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by TonyG:
<strong>tazman
The 1.82 bar is what's reflected on the factory boost gauge.
It's not an actual pressure of 1.82 x 14.7
The boost pressure is actually .82 bar.
Your 1.1 bar is 16.7psi
The .82 bar is 12 psi
You're running more boost than 1.82 bar (on the factory gauge.).</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Tony, I believe tazman knew that, and was only being sarcastic.. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
<strong>tazman
The 1.82 bar is what's reflected on the factory boost gauge.
It's not an actual pressure of 1.82 x 14.7
The boost pressure is actually .82 bar.
Your 1.1 bar is 16.7psi
The .82 bar is 12 psi
You're running more boost than 1.82 bar (on the factory gauge.).</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Tony, I believe tazman knew that, and was only being sarcastic.. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
05-05-2003 | 08:16 PM
#17
Three Wheelin'
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
From: Reading PA
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by TonyG:
<strong>tazman
The 1.82 bar is what's reflected on the factory boost gauge.
It's not an actual pressure of 1.82 x 14.7
The boost pressure is actually .82 bar.
Your 1.1 bar is 16.7psi
The .82 bar is 12 psi
You're running more boost than 1.82 bar (on the factory gauge.).</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">I know that is why I put
after what I said. You would think the people testing the car would know that also!
<strong>tazman
The 1.82 bar is what's reflected on the factory boost gauge.
It's not an actual pressure of 1.82 x 14.7
The boost pressure is actually .82 bar.
Your 1.1 bar is 16.7psi
The .82 bar is 12 psi
You're running more boost than 1.82 bar (on the factory gauge.).</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">I know that is why I put
after what I said. You would think the people testing the car would know that also!
05-05-2003 | 08:26 PM
#19
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
From: socal
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by Jake951:
<strong>Stay tuned...</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">No pun intended?
<strong>Stay tuned...</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">No pun intended?
05-05-2003 | 08:33 PM
#20
Burning Brakes
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,184
Likes: 1
From: Espoo, Finland
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica">Originally posted by tazman:
<strong>You just beat me to it Turbo-Tommy</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica"><img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[bigbye]" title="" src="graemlins/xyxwave.gif" />
<strong>You just beat me to it Turbo-Tommy</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Helvetica"><img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" /> <img border="0" alt="[bigbye]" title="" src="graemlins/xyxwave.gif" />
05-06-2003 | 02:53 AM
#25
Race Director
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 14,075
Likes: 3
From: Santa Barbara, CA
If you guys may have noticed, the prices of used 951s have been creeping up this past year.
One of my favorite articles have always been the 951S vs. 930 showdown:
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_0.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (cover)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_1-2.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 1-2)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_3-4.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 3-4)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_5-6.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 5-6)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_7-8.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 7-8)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_9-10.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 9-10)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_11-12.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 11-12)</a>
One of my favorite articles have always been the 951S vs. 930 showdown:
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_0.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (cover)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_1-2.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 1-2)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_3-4.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 3-4)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_5-6.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 5-6)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_7-8.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 7-8)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_9-10.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 9-10)</a>
<a href="http://members.rennlist.com/951_racerx/951vs930_11-12.jpg" target="_blank">951 vs. 930 (page 11-12)</a>
05-06-2003 | 09:46 AM
#27
Rennlist Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 77,321
Likes: 668
That 951S vs 930 is entertaining. Throughout the article they write about how much faster the 951 is on the track and in the canyons but at the end it's the attitude 'The 951 is faster but the 930 scared the sh*t out out of so I'm voting for it'.
However, I'd love to have both. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
However, I'd love to have both. <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" />
