Innovate LC1 vs AEM UEGO?
01-03-2011, 02:33 AM
#3
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
I figure analog is easier to see a trend.. like if you're watching it as you do a run, you can easily see if it's leaning out or etc. But I think for instantaneous readings, digital would definitely be easier.
Just which is more useful when DIY tuning?
Just which is more useful when DIY tuning?
01-03-2011, 03:58 AM
#4
Professional Hoon
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 7,090
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
data logging would be good at top end tuning. i would not do it by my self at high speeds playing with fuel ratios. if you have a friend helping you, any gauge would be good. it's a personal choice in the end. personally i like the digital gauge for fine tuning with the decimal place but i like the looks of the analog gauge and it would be harder to get that AFR of eg 12.4 on an analog gauge then digital.
01-03-2011, 04:17 AM
#5
Three Wheelin'
...I use the ZR-2: http://www.zeitronix.com/Products/ZR-2/ZR-2.htm
It's both analog and digital, sorta...had the dial and the numeric readout in the center. It has a bunch off fancy tools (including the ability to act as a boost gauge as well, among other things), so it's pretty flexible. John @ Vitesse recommended it to me when I was installing my MAF and it's been rock solid.
It comes with software, etc... but I've got everything wired up to my Vitesse piggyback so I just monitor/datalog from there - easier for me and it's the same data.
It's both analog and digital, sorta...had the dial and the numeric readout in the center. It has a bunch off fancy tools (including the ability to act as a boost gauge as well, among other things), so it's pretty flexible. John @ Vitesse recommended it to me when I was installing my MAF and it's been rock solid.
It comes with software, etc... but I've got everything wired up to my Vitesse piggyback so I just monitor/datalog from there - easier for me and it's the same data.
