Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Factory v. Raceware Studs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2010, 05:20 PM
  #31  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

It will be similar to the current motor, but I am hoping to use oversized studs (like those used by milledge), lower compression mahle pistons (the andial pistons cc out to 8.7:1 or so despite what the box says), and a cometic gasket instead of o-rings and a wide fire. Also planning for a slightly freer breathing 2.7 8v head so I can get more hp without more peak torque-- more like you have-- because clutch options/compromises become pretty harsh when the torque gets way up there. Will stay with my current Vitesse turbo and engine management.
Old 10-10-2010, 05:23 PM
  #32  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
As they say down here, Bugger!

So given a blank canvas Tom do you think there is anything more that you can do? Clearly you have a plan so best of luck with that. Are you going to keep pootling around on 14psi until the new motor is built? Not the worst case scenario of course.
Oh I can drive it now up to 12psi or so (14 or 15 if I put tons of torque on the studs) -- it's just not the same.
Old 10-10-2010, 05:33 PM
  #33  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Tom. really sorry to hear this.
I seem to be getting a similar problem on my engine, will report when I replace the studs (Raceware->stock), in my case I want to believe the problem is caused by improper torque and no retorquing of the head... I hope
Old 10-10-2010, 06:09 PM
  #34  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

I tried new Racewares this time, but only went to 65/70 ft lbs this time because raceware insisted that was the best clamp. But this time I did retorque them and it didn't help. In my last attempt before this one, I torqued to 95 ft lbs., and it did seem to hold a few psi more boost, but then the profec malfunctioned and I blew it out again...
Old 10-11-2010, 02:04 AM
  #35  
Crazy Eddie

Rennlist Member

 
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 6,985
Received 69 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom M'Guinn
Well....drum roll please...... it didn't.

After trying every trick in the book, it's still leaking. It's hard to check with the o-rings installed in the block, but at this point it seems the deck has low spots and it's just not going to seal well enough. It'll drive around town fine, and hold stock boost levels, but when I turn the boost up even a little, it starts pushing coolant out the overflow. Because the block is o-ringed, it's not as simple as just getting it decked. So, it's back to the drawing board right now. I do have a plan though, and it should be a good one -- benefitting from all lessons learned. New 2.7 core is already here, courtesy of Travis at Rennbay...stay tuned....
I have seen that hunk of metal somewhere before ???
DoomII..... here it comes
Old 10-11-2010, 05:22 AM
  #36  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Will you be using larger head studs for the new block?
What diameter? Have you spoken to Milledge about the problems? (since you mention Milledge).
Old 10-11-2010, 08:36 PM
  #37  
fortysixandtwo
Three Wheelin'
 
fortysixandtwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: formerly RI, then MO, now CA
Posts: 1,649
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Yikes! Now you have me worried Tom.

Can you pull the o-rings, then deck and have the o-ring grooves remachined?
Old 07-14-2011, 11:49 PM
  #38  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

I just ran across this thread again and thought I should update it for the record. I'm happy to say I'm back to 19psi for the last few months and the HG is holding strong. In my effort to fix the original problem, I had the head surfaced twice -- effectively increasing my compression. The deck had already been surfaced, so taking more off the head just compounded the issue. I noticed that the dowel pin that aligns the head to the block seemed to be making a ridge in the head, suggesting the head was hanging up on the dowel pin when torqued. I ordered new pins with the intention of grinding them shorter, and was surprised to see that Porsche actually sells shorter pins now under the same part number. Coincidence? I also retarded the ignition timing quite a bit, since the static compression is now higher than designed. And I torqued the raceware studs to an even 100 ft. lbs. and used a 25psi coolant cap. That all seems to be doing the trick -- motor is running at least as well as ever (knock on wood!)... Just thought I'd post that up for prosperity.
Old 07-15-2011, 12:09 PM
  #39  
Crazy Eddie

Rennlist Member

 
Crazy Eddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 6,985
Received 69 Likes on 52 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom M'Guinn
I just ran across this thread again and thought I should update it for the record. I'm happy to say I'm back to 19psi for the last few months and the HG is holding strong. In my effort to fix the original problem, I had the head surfaced twice -- effectively increasing my compression. The deck had already been surfaced, so taking more off the head just compounded the issue. I noticed that the dowel pin that aligns the head to the block seemed to be making a ridge in the head, suggesting the head was hanging up on the dowel pin when torqued. I ordered new pins with the intention of grinding them shorter, and was surprised to see that Porsche actually sells shorter pins now under the same part number. Coincidence? I also retarded the ignition timing quite a bit, since the static compression is now higher than designed. And I torqued the raceware studs to an even 100 ft. lbs. and used a 25psi coolant cap. That all seems to be doing the trick -- motor is running at least as well as ever (knock on wood!)... Just thought I'd post that up for prosperity.

Hi Five Tom!!
Great work
Regards
Ed
Old 07-15-2011, 12:33 PM
  #40  
fortysixandtwo
Three Wheelin'
 
fortysixandtwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: formerly RI, then MO, now CA
Posts: 1,649
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Good to hear. btw, my head gasket had blown out also (11 o-clock, position of cylinder 4). The head is about to be sent out to have a bunch of work done to it. I'll know then, if it was warped.
Old 07-16-2011, 05:51 AM
  #41  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Nice one Tom

Originally Posted by fortysixandtwo
my head gasket had blown out also (11 o-clock, position of cylinder 4)
That is interesting.
I thought the 16V head was exempt from this issue...



Quick Reply: Factory v. Raceware Studs



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:12 PM.