Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Thoughts on hood vents I am having made

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-23-2010, 09:25 AM
  #31  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Derek, you're right in that of course I can't see it at speed, but with a vented nose panel I'm confidant that what would normally be a stall zone (nose panel) is now acting correctly as a draw through with the hood vents...however this is all conjecture. As Adam points out...maybe an easy test is to try some wool tied to the louvres. The only thing that I think could prove inconclusive is that the wool would just get caught along with the overall air going up the bonnet due to forward movement. Worth a try nonetheless.

Duke, I also think that it should help with underhood temps, both at speed and rest. I think it will help dispel heat which can in turn become heat soak. Guess some sensors or maybe even a thermometer and swap hoods might be a basic test.
Old 07-23-2010, 09:48 AM
  #32  
gt37vgt
Drifting
 
gt37vgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3,481
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

tape the wool to the bonnet in front of the vent then thread it in to the vent so there is an inch or so off wool in the vent just a tail.. think you will find the tail is sucked out and on the top of the vent after a blast ..
Old 07-23-2010, 09:49 AM
  #33  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Duke, I also think that it should help with underhood temps, both at speed and rest. I think it will help dispel heat which can in turn become heat soak. Guess some sensors or maybe even a thermometer and swap hoods might be a basic test.
It should help with underhood temps a bit, but I don't think the difference will be huge. But heat shields in the right places + vented hood = good stuff!
Old 07-23-2010, 10:05 AM
  #34  
DrZ1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
DrZ1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,126
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
I would not expect the underhood temps to differ much, but that's not key here.
The key is to create a better flow through the heat exchangers (IC, oil cooler, radiator) and getting better efficiency from them.
IC I was thinking getting the underhood temps down would help put less load on the cooling exchangers, but really all that is needed is to pull the hot air from behind them.

Would side venting of the hood in the same low pressure area as the center venting , have the similar effectiveness? Assuming the surface area's were similar? Or does the vent need to be directly behind the radiator?

I had thought about a 968 ducting style.


Steve
Old 07-23-2010, 03:10 PM
  #35  
DDP
Rocket Scientist
Rennlist Member
 
DDP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,724
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Derek, you're right in that of course I can't see it at speed, but with a vented nose panel I'm confidant that what would normally be a stall zone (nose panel) is now acting correctly as a draw through with the hood vents...however this is all conjecture. As Adam points out...maybe an easy test is to try some wool tied to the louvres. The only thing that I think could prove inconclusive is that the wool would just get caught along with the overall air going up the bonnet due to forward movement. Worth a try nonetheless.

Duke, I also think that it should help with underhood temps, both at speed and rest. I think it will help dispel heat which can in turn become heat soak. Guess some sensors or maybe even a thermometer and swap hoods might be a basic test.

I hear you, Patrick. At this point, we're really all guessing. I just think my guess is way smarter than yours. lol.
Old 07-23-2010, 04:01 PM
  #36  
alpinewhite951
Advanced
 
alpinewhite951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lebanon, PA
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you removed the weather strip from the cowl area at the back of the engine compartment, would it allow hot air to flow out and over the windshield and reduce the amount of air going under the car? I know it is a small opening, but if it would work, maybe there would be a way to increase the opening to allow more hot air to flow out.
Old 07-23-2010, 04:38 PM
  #37  
George D
Drifting
 
George D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson and Greer Arizona
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Derek, you're right in that of course I can't see it at speed, but with a vented nose panel I'm confidant that what would normally be a stall zone (nose panel) is now acting correctly as a draw through with the hood vents...however this is all conjecture. As Adam points out...maybe an easy test is to try some wool tied to the louvres. The only thing that I think could prove inconclusive is that the wool would just get caught along with the overall air going up the bonnet due to forward movement. Worth a try nonetheless.

Duke, I also think that it should help with underhood temps, both at speed and rest. I think it will help dispel heat which can in turn become heat soak. Guess some sensors or maybe even a thermometer and swap hoods might be a basic test.
Oh and they're made of some resinous material, not plastic Adam. [/QUOTE]

The original post didn't ask why some of us installed hood vents. If you are using the factory intercooler location, and factory ducting behind the factory intecooler, factory belly pan and batwing, hood vents are probably just cosmetic.

We used hood vents because I now have two oil coolers, one thermostat controlled fan driven, and one static next to my intercooler on each side mounted at an angle pointing slightly up towards the hood behind the factory bumper. We have a vented metal belly pan that was designed for this application, not the factory plastic piece. My intercooler is front mounted, and we are using a much larger radiator.

We custom built a new bumper with venting designed into the bumper for additional air flow and strength. We will be opening the front bumper cover to add flow to the intercooler, radiator, and both oil coolers where we feel will provide the best results for this particular application.

We also added custom heat shielding everywhere necessary in addition to all factory heat shielding in the engine bay. We also designed the 4" intake pipe to house the intake inside the driver fender behind the inside plastic cover. Wanted intake air out of the hot engine bay. We had to use fixed light buckets to allow this modification to work properly.

Venting the hood was part of the overall design to allow all this extra heat generated from the front of my car to flow out of the engine bay as best we could design based on what we had to work with.

These vents were reinforced with CF on the back side by us, as they didn't come this way. We wanted the hood vents to be as strong as the hood itself.

The D9 vent material is not plastic, and we talked with D9 extensively prior to just cutting vents into the hood. I don't particially like the look either way, but that was not the primary reason for venting the hood.

If you are using the factory intercooler location, the factory batwing and belly pan should be used in this application. I suppose some hood venting would help, but I've never had an issue with cooling with my 951's using the factory intercooler location. This includes a 2.5 with 425whp. No heating issues, ever.

I've seen some really well designed intercooler venting setups for the stock located intercoolers. Something like the 968TS hood setup on a few cars I've seen were very well done, and I'm sure allows better intercooler performance.

Based on our calculations, I'll never agree that hood venting for my particular application and it's location won't help evacuate heat, idling or at speed. We know it will work well based on my particular application. The metal belly pan vents and the ducting as done for the intercooler and front mounted oil coolers would not work as designed without proper hood venting.

I was simply out of options when running the car at the HP and TQ levels I was seeing on a consistent basis. The car would run too hot during some hard runs. Turning down the power (boost) solved the heating issues, but that's not what I wanted from this ride.

The proof of our build will be known as soon as we get the car back on the road.
Old 07-23-2010, 06:09 PM
  #38  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Looking forward to seeing the results George. Can't be too far away I hope.
Old 07-24-2010, 04:34 PM
  #39  
Techno Duck
Nordschleife Master
 
Techno Duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 9,980
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I am going to do those D9 vents also. Not so much for underhood temps at speed, but to reduce the heat soak when idling or after coming off the track and sitting in staging. On some occasions if i shut the car off for 1-2 minutes prior to opening the hood, the hood latch is hot enough to burn my fingers. Not to mention the turbo water pump practically runs indefinitely. I figure i dont be that guy that feels the need to pop the hood on the car every time i park it to aid in cool down .

I am hoping between the hood vents and having the headers / crossover coated by Swaintech it will reduce the heat buildup. I practically cant even lean over the passenger side fender after shutting the car off due to the heat radiating from the headers.
Old 07-24-2010, 07:11 PM
  #40  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Good point Jon, although I don't mind being one of those guys who lifts the hood between runs either.
Old 07-24-2010, 09:07 PM
  #41  
George D
Drifting
 
George D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Tucson and Greer Arizona
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Techno Duck
I am going to do those D9 vents also. Not so much for underhood temps at speed, but to reduce the heat soak when idling or after coming off the track and sitting in staging. On some occasions if i shut the car off for 1-2 minutes prior to opening the hood, the hood latch is hot enough to burn my fingers. Not to mention the turbo water pump practically runs indefinitely. I figure i dont be that guy that feels the need to pop the hood on the car every time i park it to aid in cool down .

I am hoping between the hood vents and having the headers / crossover coated by Swaintech it will reduce the heat buildup. I practically cant even lean over the passenger side fender after shutting the car off due to the heat radiating from the headers.
Imagine summer temps into the low 100's with the asphalt close to 115 degrees. Most of the track stuff I do is in the winter, spring, or fall. Tried a track day at Firebird one August......110 degrees outside. With your helmet and proper driving clothes, you are soaked. I won't do any more summer runs here unless they change the rules and let me run my AC with the windows closed...LOL.

D9 vents are positioned properly. One over the turbo and the other over the headers. They do let the hot air out, and your AC, radiator, and intercooler will probably get more flow at speed. This does make our condensors work better, and keep the AC colder.
Old 07-27-2010, 02:15 PM
  #42  
DrZ1
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
DrZ1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,126
Received 9 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

What about something similar to the 968 style open vent w/o the side NACA ducts. Something like the following link.

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=...eec2857e32.jpg

It looks to be in the low pressure zone. And should vent alot of the hot air from the IC and radiator.

Would I need a raised lip around the vent to help w/ ventalation, or could it be flush mounted, w/ directional mesh if even necessary.

Thanks
Steve
Old 07-27-2010, 02:25 PM
  #43  
Lemming
Nordschleife Master
 
Lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Altered States of America (B'ham)
Posts: 6,426
Received 86 Likes on 72 Posts
Default

Steve, I've been looking at the following vent for the car I am preparing with an FMIC in front of the radiator. Can be purchased in both fiberglass and CF.

http://www.carbontrix.com/store/inde...roducts_id=159

http://www.carbontrix.com/store/inde...products_id=91

Old 07-27-2010, 03:08 PM
  #44  
ehall
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ehall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: long gone.....
Posts: 17,413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DrZ1
What about something similar to the 968 style open vent w/o the side NACA ducts. Something like the following link.

http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=...eec2857e32.jpg

It looks to be in the low pressure zone. And should vent alot of the hot air from the IC and radiator.

Would I need a raised lip around the vent to help w/ ventalation, or could it be flush mounted, w/ directional mesh if even necessary.

Thanks
Steve
That will work. It's worth considering a way to create an exit duct.
Old 07-27-2010, 04:52 PM
  #45  
LS1Porch
Burning Brakes
 
LS1Porch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Nuke City, NM
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A small cowl on the hood would look pretty nice on these cars IMO. It would obviously need to be shielded from the air inlet for the heater/AC, but that wouldn't be too hard.


Quick Reply: Thoughts on hood vents I am having made



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:08 PM.