Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Fuel Injector Resistors?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-12-2010, 03:22 PM
  #16  
rlm328
Rennlist Member
 
rlm328's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,305
Received 309 Likes on 206 Posts
Default

Don't run any resistors and when you burn up your DME you will have an excellent excuses to go and buy a stand alone system.
Old 03-12-2010, 06:42 PM
  #17  
951_RS
Rennlist Member
 
951_RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 707
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run 72 lbers with no resistors and have had no problems so far
Old 03-12-2010, 09:10 PM
  #18  
Bri Bro
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bri Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zuba951
Injector driver circuit…and the 911 uses 2.5ohm injectors….so if it will fire 6 injectors in parallel at the same time it certainly can fire 4…..Can one of you EE guys look at this? I haven’t run my new setup yet and would really like to know…
The injectors for the mid 80s 911 and 944 are the same, so they are 4.5 ohms, not 2.5 ohms. Link from paragon, look at the year and model info:
http://www.paragon-products.com/Fuel...80.150.158.htm

If you look at the calculation on post 14 you will see that four stock injectors use 8 amps so 6 injectors will use 12 amps. Well below the limit of the driver transistor which is 16 amps.

You can run without resistors The resistors just add a little margin to the DME drivers . This is more important for cars on a track that see extended periods of wide open driving.
Old 03-13-2010, 09:27 AM
  #19  
Bri Bro
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bri Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Now that is interesting, I was thinking the injector flow rate changed between the N/A and the turbo, and the impedance stayed the same. It doesn't. That brings up an interesting point, the 944 has always used lower impedance injectors then the 944T.
http://www.clarks-garage.com/shop-manual/fuel-12.htm

I am looking at a model 90, 1989 911 and the DME as a separate wire to each injectors, six in total. It looks a lot different then a 944 DME. I will see what the other workshop manual has in it.
http://www.cannell.co.uk/964_Worksho...g_Diagrams.pdf

Found it, page 73, 86-87 911
http://www.cannell.co.uk/911_72-89_W...p%20Manual.pdf
Driving six 2.5 ohm injectors would take 24 amps, the driver transistor spec I found has a 20 amp max
http://www.datasheetcatalog.org/data...1/218016_1.pdf
Inside the 911 DME. Note the injector driver is a T220 package, not a TO3 one would expect from a 20 amp NPN darlington driver
http://dorkiphus.net/porsche/showthread.php?t=16863
And you think we have questions, look at this 911 post.
http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...jectors-8.html
And the series resistor R409 is a 0.1 Ohm and it has a feedback into the control IC. It could be a current limiting sense resistor for the control IC S400.


A test would be to put a variable load resistor (large wattage) on the injector outputs of the DME and vary it from 1 to 0.4 ohms and see if the driver IC (S400)current limits the output. One would have to trigger the S400 IC and measure the current pulse while varying the load. Another way would be to pull a injector plug off and place a load on it while measuring the current pulse. Anyone want to volunteer their DME/ wiring harness for a little destructive testing?

The only way the S400 driver could current limit the output transistor is to increase the voltage drop across the driver transistor. This in turn would increase the power dropped across the transistor. This causes more heat to be generated in the DME. This also means that current limiting the injector current also lowers the voltage going to each injector.

If the DME current limits the injector output, and it is looking like it does, the way to reduce the DME heating is to drop the current externally in a resistor so that the DME doesn't have to current limit injector current. So the circle turns.
Attached Images  

Last edited by Bri Bro; 03-13-2010 at 09:18 PM.
Old 03-13-2010, 10:44 AM
  #20  
Bri Bro
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bri Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zuba951
Take a look at the schematics. Do you agree that the driver circuits are the same?
They look the same to me.
Old 03-13-2010, 02:43 PM
  #21  
spyder348
Pro
Thread Starter
 
spyder348's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the responses. Wired in the 1.5 resistors with 16-18 gauge wire. Total resistance seems almost identical to the stock setup. i geuss they are the right resistors to go with. so for others info. i geuss upgrading to 55s or 72s with the common low imp. 2.4 2.5 resistance, 1.5 ohm 25w resistors are the way to go. no worrys about losing my dme or running to high of a duty cycle.
Old 03-13-2010, 05:57 PM
  #22  
Bri Bro
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bri Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is the way I did the math for the external resistor.

Stock injector are 4.5 ohms. Four in parallel = 1.1 ohms.
Aftermarket injectors are 2.5 ohms. Four in parallel =0.62 ohms

So, you need to add 0.48 ohm to the 0.62 ohm to get back to the stock 1.1 ohms.
Since the external resistors are in parallel, it takes two 1 ohm resistors to get 0.5 ohms. So 0.5 added to 0.62 = 1.12 ohm. Real close to the goal of 1.1 ohms.

Using two 1.5 ohm in parallel give you 0.75 ohm. Added to 0.62 = 1.33 ohm. This is only 0.23 ohm higher so it should be close enough.

Last edited by Bri Bro; 03-13-2010 at 11:41 PM.



Quick Reply: Fuel Injector Resistors?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:56 PM.