Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Lean Running MAF

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-08-2010, 11:57 PM
  #16  
tjbreen
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
tjbreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 412
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My turbo is a stock K26/6. Nothing fancy.
I like the idea of bad grounds. My car has always had weird grounding issues.
Old 02-09-2010, 12:28 AM
  #17  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 534 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tjbreen
My turbo is a stock K26/6. Nothing fancy.
I like the idea of bad grounds. My car has always had weird grounding issues.
Always good to check grounds.

I've learned time and time again that Vitesse's AFR is spot on if there is nothing else wrong with the car. I've had my share of compensating maps in the piggyback, and everyone of them ultimately turned out to be masking some other problem. Of course, you have to start with correctly matched parts. You mentioned 75lb injectors -- I didn't think Vitesse generally offered software for 75lb injectors? (72 and 83 are listed on vitesseracing.com for example...)
Old 02-09-2010, 09:48 AM
  #18  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom M'Guinn
I've had my share of compensating maps in the piggyback, and everyone of them ultimately turned out to be masking some other problem.
Good feedback, thanks.
Old 02-09-2010, 12:51 PM
  #19  
tjbreen
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
tjbreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 412
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I made sure that i ordered are the exact injectors the PO used from the same supplier. According to the supplier, these 75s are the replacements for the 72s and use the same part number (3145).

The MAF is currently grounded to the same terminal as an Ice Shark supplemental cable that runs to the engine block. Today I am ordering a complete grounding kit from Robby, the nice lister who has taken up where Ice Shark left off. This kit should eliminate any grounding issues I may have.
Old 02-09-2010, 01:42 PM
  #20  
choinga
Three Wheelin'
 
choinga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,420
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I did a supplemental as well from the front of the engine to the drivers side headlight chassis ground - I grounded my MAF down there...definitely improved things for me.

Where are you picking up +12v power for your MAF? I doubt an issue here would cause your particular problem and my experience is if you aren't getting solid 12v the car will run like crap (if at all).

Why wouldn't you order the injectors from John? I'm sure he could look up your chip and at least figure out what injectors you should have based on the map...dunno if he'd charge you for that...but it seems like the most logical thing to do.
Old 02-09-2010, 01:57 PM
  #21  
tjbreen
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
tjbreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 412
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

choinga - I basically duplicated everything from the kit as it was installed by the PO. It is when things don't work that non-Vitesse parts are a problem. Believe me, I am up to speed on Vitesse support policy and will be ordering any future parts from them.
Old 02-10-2010, 03:51 AM
  #22  
Thom
Race Car
 
Thom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,329
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by choinga
I did a supplemental as well from the front of the engine to the drivers side headlight chassis ground - I grounded my MAF down there...definitely improved things for me.
Hmmm... I have the battery cable kit from Robby with the cable between the side member and the hat for the upper balance shaft, but I suppose I will have to check again the ground for the MAF.

Last edited by Thom; 02-10-2010 at 04:42 AM.
Old 02-10-2010, 09:02 AM
  #23  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Guys, most times a ground issue will cause a rich condition. Of course, check the grounds and make sure they are fine, however don't ignore other possibilities.
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 02-10-2010, 09:10 AM
  #24  
tjbreen
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
tjbreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 412
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I ran a bunch of tests last night based on posts by choinga and fbgh2o who were trying to solve overly rich issues with their installs.

My TPS and DME temp sensor tested OK through the harness. For the DME temp sensor, Clark's listed the warm (179 deg F) resistance for this sensor to range from 280 to 360 ohms and mine was right at 280, so I will replace it figuring it may be on the edge of acceptable. I may hook up a variable potentiometer to this lead to test the sensitivity of A/F ratio to changes in reported temperature. Clark indicated that the lower the reported resistance the leaner the mixture.

I ran a bunch of supplemental grounds and tested the resistance from a number of ground points back to the battery but did not find anything egregious but did note that while running, the voltage at the battery is 14.1 but the dash gauge is showing 13V. I may pull the insturment console to clean up the footballs but I have done this in the past to fix a bad temp and fuel level sensor with no success.

Full ground and positive kit should be here this weekend from Robby and I ordered a new fuel pump to replace the 23 year old one that tested ok but I wanted to eliminate fuel as an issue.

Last edited by tjbreen; 02-10-2010 at 09:39 AM.
Old 02-10-2010, 08:05 PM
  #25  
schip43
Three Wheelin'
 
schip43's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Carson City NV
Posts: 1,507
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I know it would be a pain, but have you thought about returning the car to stock and then seeing where your at?
Old 02-11-2010, 12:40 AM
  #26  
tjbreen
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
tjbreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 412
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I could return it to the configuration it was in before but I do have data from the WB just before the MAF swap and was seeing 12.5 A/F ratios with the old Guru chips at 15PSI, so it has never been as rich as it should have been. I ran those chips for about 30 track days.

I did notice that the car runs hot when pushed hard on the track. I installed a 22x8 inch Setrab oil cooler up front to keep things within the comfortable range but, on warm days, I would get the light if the session was over 25 minutes long. At 11.5 it might have run all day without getting too hot.
Old 05-31-2020, 12:43 PM
  #27  
VDubDoug1982
Advanced
 
VDubDoug1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bluffton, SC
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tjbreen
I could return it to the configuration it was in before but I do have data from the WB just before the MAF swap and was seeing 12.5 A/F ratios with the old Guru chips at 15PSI, so it has never been as rich as it should have been. I ran those chips for about 30 track days.

I did notice that the car runs hot when pushed hard on the track. I installed a 22x8 inch Setrab oil cooler up front to keep things within the comfortable range but, on warm days, I would get the light if the session was over 25 minutes long. At 11.5 it might have run all day without getting too hot.
Did you ever resolve this lean issue? I'm having the same problem. 13s under boost.
Old 06-09-2020, 03:02 PM
  #28  
tjbreen
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
tjbreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 412
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by VDubDoug1982
Did you ever resolve this lean issue? I'm having the same problem. 13s under boost.
I did. It was a while ago but my memory is that when I switched to a larger turbo and the AF ratios improved. I have been tracking the car for the last 10 years and I am on my second larger than stock turbo since 2010. AF ratios are in the low 12s high 11s under full throttle. I am on my second AF gauge and still showing 14.7 at idle. Something in my system didn't like a worn out K26/6 turbo. Car dyno'd a few years ago at 300+ RWHP at 15LBS boost.



Quick Reply: Lean Running MAF



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:38 AM.