Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Pro's and Con's of Cat Converters??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-26-2007, 06:35 PM
  #46  
S2cab
Instructor
 
S2cab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boynton Beach, Florida
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Check out Random Technology. They don't list a bolt on cat on their website, but if you send them one, they will make an exact high flow duplicate of it. It will mount up just like stock.
Old 12-27-2007, 02:07 PM
  #47  
SD Porsche Fan
Cast Iron Man
Rennlist Member
 
SD Porsche Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 8,693
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by evil 944t
Patrick, a "test pipe" is a pipe, put in the place of the "cat" to test the difference of a clear or clogged cat.

For testing purposes(of course), You can get a large cat and weld a straight pipe through it to give it the look of a cat but with the feature of a test pipe.
I went with this ultra slim model.
Attached Images  
Old 12-27-2007, 02:15 PM
  #48  
sweanders
Race Director
 
sweanders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Sweden
Posts: 11,252
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Looks like you kept the ***** cat on the WG pipe.
Old 12-27-2007, 02:25 PM
  #49  
SD Porsche Fan
Cast Iron Man
Rennlist Member
 
SD Porsche Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 8,693
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by sweanders
Looks like you kept the ***** cat on the WG pipe.
I've always wondered what that was. Looks like I've got some more "testing" to do!
Old 12-27-2007, 06:22 PM
  #50  
nize
Banned
 
nize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle, washington - usa
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i am surprised that after all this time, nobody has tested/posted a stock exhaust comparison with/without cat.

a local 951 buddy is planning on this, so hopefully we'll have one up soon.
Old 12-27-2007, 07:49 PM
  #51  
SD Porsche Fan
Cast Iron Man
Rennlist Member
 
SD Porsche Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 8,693
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by nize
i am surprised that after all this time, nobody has tested/posted a stock exhaust comparison with/without cat.

a local 951 buddy is planning on this, so hopefully we'll have one up soon.
PorscheDoc did a while back. Cat delete only. No other mods inbetween tests.


Old 12-27-2007, 07:56 PM
  #52  
TRP951
Rennlist Member
 
TRP951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 2,085
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

the gain can vary though depending on how clogged your 20+yr old cat is
Old 12-27-2007, 07:59 PM
  #53  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,907
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

Yeah but 50 hp/tq is pretty convincing. You're right in that a 20yr clogged cat is not going to do you any favours. Wonder on new cat v's no cat?
Old 12-28-2007, 09:39 AM
  #54  
S2cab
Instructor
 
S2cab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boynton Beach, Florida
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Yeah but 50 hp/tq is pretty convincing. You're right in that a 20yr clogged cat is not going to do you any favours. Wonder on new cat v's no cat?
As stated by seattle951:"Running 16 PSI boost and a Lindsey Racing stage II MAF and no cat, I ran 307 RWHP. After upgrading the MAF head to a better unit and adding a Lindsey Racing high flow cat, I ran 311 RWHP at 15 PSI. Both runs were done on the same dyno.

Although it is hard to separate the MAF impact from the cat impact, my guess is that adding the Cat made very little difference."
Old 12-28-2007, 12:25 PM
  #55  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,907
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

It would seem that there is no definitive info out there so far. Having both options seems the way to go, yes?
Old 12-28-2007, 06:14 PM
  #56  
Geneqco
Pro
 
Geneqco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Patrick, I think it is a sizing issue for the HP expected... assuming you use a quality high flow system. Even 22 years ago with technology as it was at that time, Porsche lists identical HP and TQ for the cat and non cat versions... there is a slight difference in fuel consumption.

The obvious issue with the 50 HP/TQ difference above is that the cat was 20 years old and the cells had probably partially collapsed. I think the other issue is one of sizing... it would have been sized for a particular HP and my guess is that once you start to exceed that, you will get a difference with and without.

I think Seattle951 is a better indication... MAF change 1psi less boost and an extra 4 hp with cat... seems difficult to imagine cat detracted too much from that result.
Old 12-28-2007, 07:57 PM
  #57  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,907
Received 94 Likes on 77 Posts
Default

So you reckon just bite the bullet and get a permanent one?
Old 12-28-2007, 08:31 PM
  #58  
goldminer
Instructor
 
goldminer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm planning to go to a 3" system with no cat in two weeks when people get back to work. I don't know whether we have the "sniffers" down here. I'll have to drive discretely!
Old 12-28-2007, 08:38 PM
  #59  
nize
Banned
 
nize's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: seattle, washington - usa
Posts: 1,822
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by goldminer
I'm planning to go to a 3" system with no cat in two weeks when people get back to work. I don't know whether we have the "sniffers" down here. I'll have to drive discretely!
i don't understand why 951 owners are so paranoid about emissions testing without the cat. all three cars i've owned have easily passed emissions testing with the cat removed.
Old 12-28-2007, 08:50 PM
  #60  
Geneqco
Pro
 
Geneqco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
So you reckon just bite the bullet and get a permanent one?
Well I think it depends on your HP target and what size cat's available. Hence my suggestion of splitting into twins if a big enough cat is not available for the application... provided that can be made to fit of course.

If a big enough cat is not available and twins won't work out, then the switchable pipe comes into play. It is something you may choose to do anyway, as it would probably have soem benefit, I just suspect it would probably be pretty marginal if the cat is sized correctly. Your cat would no doubt last longer if it were not punished on the track though.


Quick Reply: Pro's and Con's of Cat Converters??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:36 PM.