Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Pro's and Con's of Cat Converters??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-25-2007, 08:19 PM
  #31  
Keithr726
Nordschleife Master
 
Keithr726's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 5,107
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Sorry to ask a stupid question, but what is a 'test pipe'? We don't use the same terms down here. Are you saying that the 'test pipe' replaces the Cat? What does it do in comparison to the Cat? I just need for the stuff that comes out of my exhaust to pass whatever the test is. It appears that some say that even with a recent Cat I won't achieve that? What is a Race Cat? Should I just get a replaceable pipe that is Cat for the road and straight through for the track?
By testpipe I mean straight pipe as in no cat in the middle of the pipe. Lindsey and speedforce both make exhaust systems with a clamp on cat and clap on straight pipe. This is a much better idea because you'd no longer have to remove the nuts from the downpipe.
Old 12-25-2007, 11:08 PM
  #32  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Well my plan is to get a removable Cat which I guess is what you call a test pipe.
Assuming that you have the Cat in and pass the 'test'?
Couple of V bands either side and in / out too easy!

This will be 4" Cat-back. Sound good?
Old 12-25-2007, 11:13 PM
  #33  
evil 944t
Rennlist Member
 
evil 944t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Well my plan is to get a removable Cat which I guess is what you call a test pipe.
Assuming that you have the Cat in and pass the 'test'?
Couple of V bands either side and in / out too easy!

This will be 4" Cat-back. Sound good?

Patrick, a "test pipe" is a pipe, put in the place of the "cat" to test the difference of a clear or clogged cat.

For testing purposes(of course), You can get a large cat and weld a straight pipe through it to give it the look of a cat but with the feature of a test pipe.
Old 12-25-2007, 11:35 PM
  #34  
Geneqco
Pro
 
Geneqco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The problem for us is not visual inspection but "sniffer". As for "switching" to do a test, I've heard they can just come up behind you and "sniff". Sort of sounds like the animal kingdom!
Old 12-25-2007, 11:57 PM
  #35  
evil 944t
Rennlist Member
 
evil 944t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geneqco
The problem for us is not visual inspection but "sniffer". As for "switching" to do a test, I've heard they can just come up behind you and "sniff". Sort of sounds like the animal kingdom!
Hmm, I see. I thought it was a visual thing. Around here, They just set up a time for you to go to inspection. They make it very easy. If you live far enough from the city(Chicago) you don't ever have to go.
Old 12-26-2007, 12:04 AM
  #36  
RPHARRIS
Racer
 
RPHARRIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A not so commonly known fact is that the common "oxidation catalyst" causes our cars to expel more CO2 than they would with a straight pipe. On my California smog certificate, one of the few things they do not limit is CO2 concentration. It's very interesting how the cause is lost somewhere in the the legislative/bureaucratic process. Running a straight pipe increases carbon monoxide and "smog" (NOx) pollution, however it does reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

I learned a ridiculous amount about this stuff when I had to deal with California smog this past summer.
Old 12-26-2007, 12:07 AM
  #37  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

No they actually have to do something rather than pass a visual test. If they suspect your car has been modified they can take you to be tested there and then. Something tells me that a 4" exhaust and imitating a flame thrower is going to alert them, so I think by sacrificing a bit of power on the road and having straight through for the track should be the best of both worlds. There seems to be many viewpoints on the efficiency and effectiveness of Cats too, and their potential to rob power. Still better than having a $25k fine and car impounded.
Old 12-26-2007, 12:34 AM
  #38  
Geneqco
Pro
 
Geneqco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RPHARRIS
A not so commonly known fact is that the common "oxidation catalyst" causes our cars to expel more CO2 than they would with a straight pipe. On my California smog certificate, one of the few things they do not limit is CO2 concentration. It's very interesting how the cause is lost somewhere in the the legislative/bureaucratic process. Running a straight pipe increases carbon monoxide and "smog" (NOx) pollution, however it does reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

I learned a ridiculous amount about this stuff when I had to deal with California smog this past summer.
Yeah, we don't have any automatic testing... it's just if they send you due to mods, or you want to voluntarily have testing due to mods, or get caught by a sniffer.

CO, NOx and HCO are very harmful whereas we encounter CO2 every time we exhale.
Old 12-26-2007, 02:42 AM
  #39  
seattle951
Pro
 
seattle951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 569
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Running 16 PSI boost and a Lindsey Racing stage II MAF and no cat, I ran 307 RWHP. After upgrading the MAF head to a better unit and adding a Lindsey Racing high flow cat, I ran 311 RWHP at 15 PSI. Both runs were done on the same dyno.

Although it is hard to separate the MAF impact from the cat impact, my guess is that adding the Cat made very little difference.
Old 12-26-2007, 02:51 AM
  #40  
seattle951
Pro
 
seattle951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 569
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nitrous Oxide is a green house gas and is more effective at trapping heat than Carbon Dioxide. Therefore it is worse than CO2. Carbon Monoxide also contributes to global working. Below is some info from Wikipedia.

GWP = Global Warming Potential

Examples of the atmospheric lifetime and GWP for several greenhouse gases include:

- CO2 has a variable atmospheric lifetime, and cannot be specified precisely. Recent work indicates that recovery from a large input of atmospheric CO2 from burning fossil fuels will result in an effective lifetime of tens of thousands of years. Carbon dioxide is defined to have a GWP of 1 over all time periods.

- Methane has an atmospheric lifetime of 12 ± 3 years and a GWP of 62 over 20 years, 23 over 100 years and 7 over 500 years. The decrease in GWP associated with longer times is associated with the fact that the methane is degraded to water and CO2 by chemical reactions in the atmosphere.

- Nitrous oxide has an atmospheric lifetime of 120 years and a GWP of 296 over 100 years.

- CFC-12 has an atmospheric lifetime of 100 years and a GWP(100) of 10600.

- HCFC-22 has an atmospheric lifetime of 12.1 years and a GWP(100) of 1700.

- Tetrafluoromethane has an atmospheric lifetime of 50,000 years and a GWP(100) of 5700.

- Sulfur hexafluoride has an atmospheric lifetime of 3,200 years and a GWP(100) of 22000.

"Carbon monoxide has an indirect radiative effect by elevating concentrations of methane and tropospheric ozone through scavenging of atmospheric constituents (e.g., the hydroxyl radical, OH) that would otherwise destroy them. Carbon monoxide is created when carbon-containing fuels are burned incompletely. Through natural processes in the atmosphere, it is eventually oxidized to carbon dioxide. Carbon monoxide has an atmospheric lifetime of only a few months and as a consequence is spatially more variable than longer-lived gases."

Source: Wikipeida
Old 12-26-2007, 05:18 AM
  #41  
RPHARRIS
Racer
 
RPHARRIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Damn! Now I don't feel so smug spitting flames at all these Priuses (...wtf is the plural of Prius anyway?)

I guess now that I know better I need to go cat shopping.
Old 12-26-2007, 05:32 AM
  #42  
Geneqco
Pro
 
Geneqco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by RPHARRIS
Damn! Now I don't feel so smug spitting flames at all these Priuses (...wtf is the plural of Prius anyway?)

I guess now that I know better I need to go cat shopping.
Pri-i?
Old 12-26-2007, 06:34 AM
  #43  
S2cab
Instructor
 
S2cab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boynton Beach, Florida
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Palm Beach County used to have emmissions testing. They did a visual for a cat, but I always suspected they profiled. Back when I had the NX2000, I had a factory cat with a Hot Shot header & CAI, & a Borla cat-back. It was a very discreet system. Not very loud at all. They use a mirror to see if a cat is present. I was asked to have the car run on the rollers, like a dyno w/o the computer, & have the tailpipe sniffed. I suspect that was to find out if the cat was gutted & a straight pipe welded inside. It wasn't very loud. That should have been the first clue the cat was in place. It did fail the test. There was a carbon clogged air injection diaphram that I had to clean out, but it was borderline. I retested after the fix, & all was fine. As a side note, the county employee almost wrecked my car on the rollers. He almost lost it when it started to go sideways during the test. That would have been interesting.
Old 12-26-2007, 07:11 AM
  #44  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RPHARRIS
Damn! Now I don't feel so smug spitting flames at all these Priuses (...wtf is the plural of Prius anyway?)

I guess now that I know better I need to go cat shopping.
Prissys??
Old 12-26-2007, 01:34 PM
  #45  
PEvans
Rennlist Member
 
PEvans's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
Posts: 2,673
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Any specific brand or source recommenations for a "quality" catalyst??


Quick Reply: Pro's and Con's of Cat Converters??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:08 AM.