Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Need info on Brake System

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2007, 02:56 AM
  #16  
Geneqco
Pro
 
Geneqco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I think I'd be talking to the distributor you got the pads from.
Old 05-28-2007, 03:25 AM
  #17  
wwinton
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
wwinton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I tried that, they seem to think it couldn't be there pads and that there must be a problem with the car, that is why I was interested to know if many people had changed that pressure regulator, and if it makes a difference.
Old 05-28-2007, 04:04 AM
  #18  
Geneqco
Pro
 
Geneqco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Are you using the same type of pads on the rear?
Old 05-28-2007, 04:13 AM
  #19  
wwinton
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
wwinton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no, I did have stock Textar's in the rear
Old 05-28-2007, 05:15 AM
  #20  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,919
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Well I don't know about those 'Z' pads from PFC, but I do know that the 01's and the 97's work very well in my car. Having said that, previously I had EBC Yellows and Greens and suffered sponginess and even a couple of times all the way to the floor which always gets the pupils wide open. Sounds like the front and rear pads you have are more street than track?
Old 05-28-2007, 05:25 AM
  #21  
Geneqco
Pro
 
Geneqco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by wwinton
no, I did have stock Textar's in the rear
I have read that Porsche played around a little with the proportioning valve from model year to model year. According to the Workshop Manual we have a 5/18 valve whilst the one Paragon offers is 5/33. Both have a 0.46 reduction coefficient. The difference is the switchover pressure - 18 bar stock, 33 bar paragon.
In your case, assuming the pads are of good quality and not defective,
I'm just wondering if the issue may be caused by having different pads front and rear. If the front pads have substantially higher friction material than the stock rear pads, this could cause an imbalance front/rear greater than that intended by the valve.
Old 05-28-2007, 05:48 AM
  #22  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,919
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Sounds plausible Scott.
Old 05-28-2007, 05:55 AM
  #23  
ninefiveone
Rennlist Member
 
ninefiveone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay
Posts: 1,563
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

It's not the rears. Guaranteed.

Half dozen stops from 40mph isn't close to enough to bed track pads.

You can easily run different pads front to rear and not get this problem. I've run lots of combinations without issue. Under track braking, there's so much weight transfer that it makes very little difference. Tweak rear pads and braking when you're looking for that last 2-5% of braking performance. This is not that kind of situation.

Are you getting ABS engagement? It sounds to me (others braking at 100 marker without issue) that you're not braking hard enough, braking early, and braking long. This is one of the quickest ways to pour a ton of heat into the brakes and fade them quick.
Old 05-28-2007, 09:57 AM
  #24  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,919
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

I don't disagree with what you're saying 951, and I also think there is something not quite right mechanically, but theoretically if you had pads that were much more 'bitey' on the front isn't there a possibility of them hogging too much of the retardation and therefore drawing too much heat by virtue of their superiority? This is a late night theory which I'm not all together happy with either. Also if my memory serves me correctly this car is on pretty stock suspension which under braking will lurch forward and push more weight up front creating more heat.
Old 05-29-2007, 05:14 AM
  #25  
ninefiveone
Rennlist Member
 
ninefiveone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay
Posts: 1,563
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

I hear what you're saying but it doesn't work that way (pads hogging retardation) but you're on track with the weight transfer. That's one of the reasons front brakes do almost all the work. You can increase rear braking as much as you like but long before you get substantial improvements in braking the rears will just start locking up.

If driving approach isn't the issue, then bed the pads better and go from there. If it was just happening to one corner of the car, I'd think a caliper needed rebuilidng but all four? It's not impossible but very unlikely.

I'm running quite a bit more power than stock (vitesse S3, etc) and still running the stock brakes without major issues like this. At this power level with stock brakes I'm eating expensive track pads at an alarming rate (one full set per ~2 track days at this point) but I don't get anything near the kind of rotor damage I'm seeing in the picture above.
Old 05-29-2007, 09:02 AM
  #26  
RKD in OKC
Rennlist Member
 
RKD in OKC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In a tizzy
Posts: 4,987
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I had front pad smoking and boiling super blue on my 88 S.

Upping the rear bias valve helped only in lightening the rear a little more for better rotation while trail braking thru corner entry. It did not help the front pad heat.

Going to slotted rotors did help bring the heat down quite a bit. Learning to brake less by scrubbing speed on turn-in helped even more.
Old 05-29-2007, 09:40 AM
  #27  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,919
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ninefiveone
I hear what you're saying but it doesn't work that way (pads hogging retardation) but you're on track with the weight transfer. That's one of the reasons front brakes do almost all the work. You can increase rear braking as much as you like but long before you get substantial improvements in braking the rears will just start locking up.

If driving approach isn't the issue, then bed the pads better and go from there. If it was just happening to one corner of the car, I'd think a caliper needed rebuilidng but all four? It's not impossible but very unlikely.

I'm running quite a bit more power than stock (vitesse S3, etc) and still running the stock brakes without major issues like this. At this power level with stock brakes I'm eating expensive track pads at an alarming rate (one full set per ~2 track days at this point) but I don't get anything near the kind of rotor damage I'm seeing in the picture above.
Lol I hear you. "Pads hogging retardation" might just get a T-shirt with that on it. Yes I'm totally with you on the front brake syndrome, it was just a late night concept. I can't see it as being the style of Wayne's braking as he would have had this issue before. Probably bed in and wrong pad + lack of cooling.
Old 06-04-2007, 11:06 PM
  #28  
ezinternet
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ezinternet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 326
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

wwinton - in your picture of the front rotor I think I see the protective plate extending up around and behind the rotor. On my 964 I removed these with no ill effect along with other games to improve rotor cooling.

Disclaimer - I haven't had a 944 in a decade, so apply many many grains of salt.

Are people removing these when tracking a car?



Quick Reply: Need info on Brake System



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:20 PM.