Nitrogen in tires?
#3
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It doesn't leak nearly as fast, that's why people use it. Air is ~80% nitrogen, ~20% oxygen (w/ a little argon in there as well), and since nitrogen molecules are larger than oxygen, it doesn't leak as easily thru the tire/wheel. It's also relatively inert (compared to oxygen...has to do w/ electronegativity) and cheap (tho obviously not as cheap as air!). Price Club/Sam's Club will fill your tires for free.
It will also expand slightly less under heat, but will nevertheless expand just like air.
And yes, it is slightly lighter, tho essentially negligibly-so.
It will also expand slightly less under heat, but will nevertheless expand just like air.
And yes, it is slightly lighter, tho essentially negligibly-so.
#4
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ausgeflippt951
and since nitrogen molecules are larger than oxygen, it doesn't leak as easily thru the tire/wheel.
The main reason why race teams use it is because it is a dry gas. It does not contain water vapor and it involves less partial pressures. The result is a much more stable pressure gain curve as the tire warms up. As a result it gives more consistent tire temps for adjusting the pressure and setup.
#5
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Driftomagnifico
No, they are comparably sized (nitrogen is triple bonded, and is smaller), and generally the lesser mass gas will permeate the bladder faster (nitrogen being lighter than oxygen). The tire itself is not designed to be semi-permeable for obvious reasons.
The main reason why race teams use it is because it is a dry gas. It does not contain water vapor and it involves less partial pressures. The result is a much more stable pressure gain curve as the tire warms up. As a result it gives more consistent tire temps for adjusting the pressure and setup.
The main reason why race teams use it is because it is a dry gas. It does not contain water vapor and it involves less partial pressures. The result is a much more stable pressure gain curve as the tire warms up. As a result it gives more consistent tire temps for adjusting the pressure and setup.
Just looked at my old chem book and I was wrong re: molecule sizes. But seriously, how can O2 "contain" water vapor when the water vapor is larger than the O2 molec's themselves?
Again, N2 is relatively inert (compared to O2) and is therefore more predicable under variable load (temp/heat, increased pressure, etc.)
...this makes me wonder if anyone's ever bothered to use argon?
![hiha](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif)
#6
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ausgeflippt951
Just looked at my old chem book and I was wrong re: molecule sizes. But seriously, how can O2 "contain" water vapor when the water vapor is larger than the O2 molec's themselves?
Again, N2 is relatively inert (compared to O2) and is therefore more predicable under variable load (temp/heat, increased pressure, etc.)
...this makes me wonder if anyone's ever bothered to use argon?![hiha](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif)
Again, N2 is relatively inert (compared to O2) and is therefore more predicable under variable load (temp/heat, increased pressure, etc.)
...this makes me wonder if anyone's ever bothered to use argon?
![hiha](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif)
You could use argon, it's inert and gaseous. I'd be willing to bet that nitrogen is more readily available and equally suited for the role at a cheaper cost.
#7
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ausgeflippt951
when the water vapor is larger than the O2 molec's themselves?
O=O vs. H-O-H
O2 is a larger molecule than H2O. H2O's bonds are more polar (the molecule is polar as well) and the valance shell structure of oxygen is very close to the nucleus which provides rather short bond lengths.
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Driftomagnifico
Might want to revisit Mr. Chemistry book.
O=O vs. H-O-H
O2 is a larger molecule than H2O. H2O's bonds are more polar (the molecule is polar as well) and the valance shell structure of oxygen is very close to the nucleus which provides rather short bond lengths.
O=O vs. H-O-H
O2 is a larger molecule than H2O. H2O's bonds are more polar (the molecule is polar as well) and the valance shell structure of oxygen is very close to the nucleus which provides rather short bond lengths.
But back to the topic at-hand: yes, nitrogen is the best way to inflate your tires due mainly to cost...If I ever meet Schumi I'll have him drive a race car inflated w/ N2 and then w/ Ar and see if he can tell the difference!
![hiha](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif)
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
#10
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Pressure gain...
F1 tires are adjusted in 1/4 psi increments for handling. Street radials require almost 3 psi to make much difference in handling. These numbers are from Bridgestones F1 tire guy who does road racing himself.
Because of the huge pressure changes required to make much difference in street tires, I personally think nitrogen is not worth the effort for the street.
Track compounds are a whole nuther aminal.
F1 tires are adjusted in 1/4 psi increments for handling. Street radials require almost 3 psi to make much difference in handling. These numbers are from Bridgestones F1 tire guy who does road racing himself.
Because of the huge pressure changes required to make much difference in street tires, I personally think nitrogen is not worth the effort for the street.
Track compounds are a whole nuther aminal.
#13
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ha yeah, then your car would really sail! haha nah, it's not cost-effective, and its thermal conductivity is on-par w/ O2, thus giving it similar expansion properties.
Speaking of thermal conductivity, it just occurred to me that N2 is significantly lower than O2. This is good.
Speaking of thermal conductivity, it just occurred to me that N2 is significantly lower than O2. This is good.
#14
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ausgeflippt951
Where are you getting this information, considering a double bond is physically shorter than a single. Plus, given HOH's polarity, it's got a pair of valence electrons at the top, thus forcing the molecule to physically take up more space. H2O is larger than O2. Oh also, bonds themselves cannot be polar. The molecule is made polar due to left-over valence electrons that shift the partial charge of the molec.
But back to the topic at-hand: yes, nitrogen is the best way to inflate your tires due mainly to cost...If I ever meet Schumi I'll have him drive a race car inflated w/ N2 and then w/ Ar and see if he can tell the difference!
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
But back to the topic at-hand: yes, nitrogen is the best way to inflate your tires due mainly to cost...If I ever meet Schumi I'll have him drive a race car inflated w/ N2 and then w/ Ar and see if he can tell the difference!
![hiha](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif)
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
2.75 Å is the molecular diameter of water (l)
2.90 Å is the molecular diameter of oxygen (g)
3.00 Å is the molecular diameter of nitrogen (g)
So nitrogen is larger, but barely enough to make a difference.