Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

EGT Readings... What are you getting ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2007, 07:14 AM
  #31  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Thanks Wayne, that's pretty much what I came to as well. What effect does say the size of your headers have, or if they're coated / wrapped. Would going up in size of intercooler / pipes have an effect? If this is the case then what about opening up all your breathing, or is that too much in front of detonation if you know what I mean?
Old 01-24-2007, 07:19 AM
  #32  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Excessive richness will raise the EGT. Measuring in the crossover I would say you don't have to worry if you stay below 1750.
Old 01-24-2007, 09:22 AM
  #33  
Chris White
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist Small
Business Sponsor

 
Chris White's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Marietta, NY
Posts: 7,505
Likes: 0
Received 35 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

that’s right - richening the mixture won't help. The only thing that will help is to advance the timing (this will also get you a little more power). But to do this you will either have to run less boost or better fuel.
Old 01-24-2007, 01:04 PM
  #34  
Bill
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: A suburb of Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I use the Zetronix data logger to measure my egt. Number 4 cylinder. City driving at around 2500 rpm the egt is usually around 1250. Freeway at 2500 rpm is usually around 1450. Constant crusing at 4500 rpm on the freeway, it has crept as high as 1650. 1650 worries me.

I do not remember where....but I read an article that Porsche put out on the 944 engine that used the term "thermally optimized combustion". It was in reference to the DME strategy for fuel efficiency. I do not know all the engineering behind "thermally optimized combustion" but the higher the cumbustion temps, the more complete burn you will have, and thus the better the fuel economy. I believe this "thermally optimized combustion" is the culprit behind all the smog failures. High combustion temps also create NOX. High NOX seems to occur on all our cars.

Most articles that I have read on egt seem to recomend temps around 1200. With such high egt levels, its no wonder that Porsche used expensive sodium filled valves, ceramic lined ports and stainless steel headers.

The article also noted the "fuel shut off at closed throttle" strategy.
Old 01-24-2007, 02:35 PM
  #35  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill
I use the Zetronix data logger to measure my egt. Number 4 cylinder. City driving at around 2500 rpm the egt is usually around 1250. Freeway at 2500 rpm is usually around 1450. Constant crusing at 4500 rpm on the freeway, it has crept as high as 1650. 1650 worries me.

I do not remember where....but I read an article that Porsche put out on the 944 engine that used the term "thermally optimized combustion". It was in reference to the DME strategy for fuel efficiency. I do not know all the engineering behind "thermally optimized combustion" but the higher the cumbustion temps, the more complete burn you will have, and thus the better the fuel economy. I believe this "thermally optimized combustion" is the culprit behind all the smog failures. High combustion temps also create NOX. High NOX seems to occur on all our cars.

Most articles that I have read on egt seem to recomend temps around 1200. With such high egt levels, its no wonder that Porsche used expensive sodium filled valves, ceramic lined ports and stainless steel headers.

The article also noted the "fuel shut off at closed throttle" strategy.
Correct. The hotter the better for power and fuel economy, but not for safety. Which sets the stage for the balancing act of most power vs. NOT blowing HG.

Thanks to people like ST and Laust and others that have really pushed the boost limits we are seeing it is no longer theory that pressure does not blow HG or motors.....HEAT/KNOCK blows them. If your a/f & timing (EGT's) are spot on, you can run a LOT of boost.
Old 01-24-2007, 02:38 PM
  #36  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Duke
Excessive richness will raise the EGT. Measuring in the crossover I would say you don't have to worry if you stay below 1750.
If you are measuring EGT's in the crossover you will getting flase low readings; i.e. you should be measuring as close to the cylinder as possible.

I can't remember how much drop in EGT there is from the headers at the block to the crossover, but 1750 at the crossover would be MUCH hotter at the chamber.

The crossover is where you mount your wideband not EGT.
Old 01-24-2007, 02:41 PM
  #37  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toddk911
but 1750 at the crossover would be MUCH hotter at the chamber.
Maybe, maybe not. Retarded ignition timing and a rich mixture can burn well into the exhaust stroke, causing a high EGT.



Rogue
Old 01-24-2007, 02:50 PM
  #38  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue_Ant
Maybe, maybe not. Retarded ignition timing and a rich mixture can burn well into the exhaust stroke, causing a high EGT.



Rogue
Correct. But my point was in regards to readings at different points. The most accurate is at the header. The reading at the crossover, regardless of what the number is, will be lower than at the header. If you are tuning based on your EGT reading at the crossover, you are in for trouble.
Old 01-24-2007, 02:58 PM
  #39  
hp18racer
Rennlist Member
 
hp18racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 868
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Advancing WOT spark timing 4 degrees in my car dropped the peak EGT I see at the track about 100F. I measure it 1" into the exhaust.
Old 01-24-2007, 03:50 PM
  #40  
mikjel
Advanced
 
mikjel's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chris White
that’s right - richening the mixture won't help.
Well, my egt dropped 50-70 fahrenheit when richening from 12,7:1 to 11,5-8:1.
Old 01-24-2007, 04:39 PM
  #41  
Rogue_Ant
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Small Business Partner

 
Rogue_Ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 5,252
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikjel
Well, my egt dropped 50-70 fahrenheit when richening from 12,7:1 to 11,5-8:1.
Perhaps they dropped because of less knock, thus more ignition timing?



Rogue
Old 01-24-2007, 05:46 PM
  #42  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,902
Received 93 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Man this tuning caper is so involved. So many things impact upon something else. I can see going around in circles is a distinct possibility!
Old 01-24-2007, 06:51 PM
  #43  
Perry 951
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Perry 951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 6,915
Likes: 0
Received 69 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by toddk911
Correct. But my point was in regards to readings at different points. The most accurate is at the header. The reading at the crossover, regardless of what the number is, will be lower than at the header. If you are tuning based on your EGT reading at the crossover, you are in for trouble.
Todd, I'm confused. First you say he is correct about hotter temps in the crossover due to retarded timing, but then you say temps will be lower regardless.

If you have a rich mixture or retarded timing, the fuel will not completly burn in the chamber, and also not likely at the port, it will burn in the availible space in the header, crossover, or the rest of the exhaust. This is evident when you see flames during shift points. The temps during off throttle shifts at the ports is much lower than that in the pipe simply because the fuel is buring in the pipe and not in the chamber.

I use my EGT numbers as a baseline for my car. Each adjustment for fuel or timing will change the reading. Being able to identify peaks and valleys, and know why they happen, is key, not the raw number itself.
Old 01-24-2007, 07:10 PM
  #44  
Trucho-951
Pro
 
Trucho-951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Napa Valley, CA
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hp18racer
Advancing WOT spark timing 4 degrees in my car dropped the peak EGT I see at the track about 100F. I measure it 1" into the exhaust.
Sometimes a drop in EGT is not a good thing, what measures did you take to ensure that in fact this drop in EGT was not an indication of some degree of detonation. I ask because advancing ignition timing on a forced induction engine while under full boost just seems counterintuitive.
Old 01-24-2007, 10:36 PM
  #45  
hp18racer
Rennlist Member
 
hp18racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 868
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I hooked up a digital counter to KLR pin 15. At 17psi, 100 octane I see almost no knock events. If I go down to about 50% 91, 50% 100 octane at the same boost level, I see dozens of events on every hard acceleration. Watching the knock counter I can figure out what octane I need for any given boost level to be knock safe. If the a/f and knock are behaving, then I'm looking to keep EGT in line with stock number (1650 or less) to not burn up valves.


Quick Reply: EGT Readings... What are you getting ?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:08 AM.