15psi stock WG vs 15psi Dual. vs. 17psi.
#1
Race Car
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
15psi stock WG vs 15psi Dual. vs. 17psi.
Kinda different at the same psi eh? (Blue vs. Green)
Whats especially interesting is how the 15 and the 17 psi give practically the same hp. (Boost drops to about the same at 6k rpms due to compressor maxing out no matter what it boosted earlier. )
(Green Vs. Red)
Oh yeah. This is BEFORE I did the intercooler install. 2.5" exh., Filter, Autothority chip set. All is same for Stock Wg. vs. Dual Port 38mm.
Just thought I'd clarify the difference between the two boost levels. Practically NOTHING different up top. (Obviously from almost identical boost loss up there.)
Whats especially interesting is how the 15 and the 17 psi give practically the same hp. (Boost drops to about the same at 6k rpms due to compressor maxing out no matter what it boosted earlier. )
(Green Vs. Red)
Oh yeah. This is BEFORE I did the intercooler install. 2.5" exh., Filter, Autothority chip set. All is same for Stock Wg. vs. Dual Port 38mm.
Just thought I'd clarify the difference between the two boost levels. Practically NOTHING different up top. (Obviously from almost identical boost loss up there.)
#2
So, blue is stock WG @15psi and green is DP-Wastegate @15psi, nothing else different? That means that the DP wastegate alone is giving you 32HP!? And the only other mod is the Autothority chip. That’s a pretty clear chart. Interesting to note that the increased psi did not change things much. Do you think there is another factor that may be bottle-necking power and preventing the 17psi from showing more gains?
#5
Race Car
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by schnellfahrer
That's a 26/8, right?
No. Thats a 26/6 stock 1986.5 951 turbo.
Yes. the torque did improve much in mine also, I just didn't post it up on the graph because there were too many lines. But it's because the torque peaks sooner in the rpm band and the turbo can keep up there. but when the blower runs out breath up high, it all equals back out to the same as the 15psi setting. (Which at that point is more like 12psi.)
And YES! there is a bottleneck. The compressor! It's just straight up too small and can only blow a certain amount of CFM at those rpms. So no matter what boost you start out with. Say 20psi if I wanted to. The horsepower amount at that rpm (5700)will still be almost exactly 256hp because the compressor cant send more that about 13psi at that rpm, regardless of how high it boosted earlier in the rev range. That is the whole reason I posted this. TO show you guys, no matter how much boost you throw at the stock compressor, it's not going to gain ANY more power on that mod alone past 15psi. (Maybe a few more from momentum.)
So, end result, if you want any more horsepower than that, (Sans head porting and cams - which will be optimimized by a larger turbo anyway) Just start out by changing the turbo. Don't try to turn up the boost past 17-18. (It does help alot in torque down low and us track guys know the importance of that out of a corner.)
#6
Race Car
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RRRandy
So, blue is stock WG @15psi and green is DP-Wastegate @15psi, nothing else different? That means that the DP wastegate alone is giving you 32HP!? And the only other mod is the Autothority chip. That’s a pretty clear chart. Interesting to note that the increased psi did not change things much. Do you think there is another factor that may be bottle-necking power and preventing the 17psi from showing more gains?
Nothing else was different between these two runs. STRICTLY wastegate. I was sure to keep that constant. Yes! 32 hp! That's why I posted the earlier "HOLY COW" thread. I had the same reaction to that upgrade as you did.! - NO. the other mods were filter and aftermarket straight through type muffler 2.5"
Read above post about why Max HP didn't change much.
Trending Topics
#8
Drifting
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Akron, Ohio
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea, that is a nice chart. I had about 242rwhp and 297rwtq running 17psi and 14ish at redline last year. This is one main reason I am changing turbos this winter. Need to get a nice new turbo that can actually produce power and keep it! My mid-range isn't bad but you can feel it does fall flat on top. The maf/piggyback did help mine to get more upper end power but that can only help so much.
#9
Three Wheelin'
Sorry this is probably a stupid question, but can someone explain where the power is coming from? If the stock and DP wastegate both hold 15 PSI, what's the difference? I thought the only reason to improve the wastegate was if it couldn't hold the pressure that you want.
#10
Race Car
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kevincnc
Sorry this is probably a stupid question, but can someone explain where the power is coming from? If the stock and DP wastegate both hold 15 PSI, what's the difference? I thought the only reason to improve the wastegate was if it couldn't hold the pressure that you want.
#11
That’s awesome. By straight-through exhaust, you mean test tube in stead of cat…but other wise stock?(stock being 2.5” ‘en all). How much to you think the chip is helping? By that I mean to ask; without the chip, would you expect to see the same gains between the SP-WG and the DP-WG?
#12
Monkeys Removed by Request
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Originally Posted by RRRandy
That’s awesome. By straight-through exhaust, you mean test tube in stead of cat…but other wise stock?(stock being 2.5” ‘en all). How much to you think the chip is helping? By that I mean to ask; without the chip, would you expect to see the same gains between the SP-WG and the DP-WG?
#15
Race Car
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RRRandy
95one, If you are running a manual boost controller, then there is no way the chip can cut boost, right?