When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Obviously benefits in greater displacement, but the expense to get what a 2.5 can do does not seem worth it! How much HP do you need, 600WHP?
Well, for one you get earlier boost kicking in on 2.7L+engines rather than the standard 3,000-3,300rpms on 2.5L, you get 2,800 or even less.
Also, you get more power at lower boost levels (obviously). This is all something i expected you to know NZ951, regardless of power levels, not everyone wants to runs race gas and push 20+psi daily. How does 450+whp at 16psi where 1bar is achieved at 2,800rpms on pump gas sound?
?? you are pulling my leg right ??? There are at least 3 threads (7+pages long) on such dyno's/datalogs and so on, one of them is by closest friend IIRC who just got his car back from a tuner a week ago or so.
Thats the thing - its nice to know its there. The problem is that you cannot get wide enough street tires under a standard width body to justify 500 rwhp.
I just run around at 17-18 psi and pump gas timing (about 460 hp) - more than enough to bitch-slap a new 997 carrera S into the weeds.
Hosrom - you cannot limit this statement to displacement change alone. The onset of boost is a result of the relationship between displacement and turbo selection.