Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

951 #L vs 968 turbo question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-13-2005, 11:14 PM
  #1  
tammons
Pro
Thread Starter
 
tammons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 951 #L vs 968 turbo question

I am sort of interested in building a 3L 16v turbo engine. I have fabed other turbo V8 setups before and setup a tec II and haltech on each so I dont feel I will be over my head fab wise.

My hypothetical question is. Would it be more cost effective or just better off to stuff a 3L 16 V turbocharged motor into a 951 or turbocharge a 968. I realize either would involve an engine tear down. Also it seems like a turbo 968 would be worth more than a 3L 951 for resale if I ever get tired of it.

I am talking about 500 hp min though, so I assume I would also need a different trans and a few other upgrades like clutch. Shame with that 6 speed and all.
Old 06-14-2005, 02:38 AM
  #2  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

My vote is for a 968 turbo platform... everything is newer etc. Raj has done this...
Old 06-14-2005, 06:20 PM
  #3  
AL951
Racer
 
AL951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Central CA
Posts: 451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A 968 would be the better starting point. It has all the updates and like NZ said, it is just newer. you will spend about the same anyway. Good lock and keep us updated!

Regards,
AL
Old 06-14-2005, 07:15 PM
  #4  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Since you need the 3L engine, start with a 968.. You will need the 951 X-over, Engine mount, downpipe, Intercooler... You can use the 951 wiring harness and DME/KLR or just use the 968 electronics, but remapped for turbo application. In the end, the 968 will be unique and more valuable.
__________________
John
Email
www.vitesseracing.com
Old 06-14-2005, 07:19 PM
  #5  
mark944turbo
Three Wheelin'
 
mark944turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,983
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

You could start with a 944S2. The 951 crossover pipe isnt going to work is it? Getting a 968 is an expensive start.
Old 06-14-2005, 07:35 PM
  #6  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

The 951 X-over will need to be modifed to work with the 968 header. A custom intake is needed with any 16-V head.
Old 06-14-2005, 07:47 PM
  #7  
mark944turbo
Three Wheelin'
 
mark944turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 1,983
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Thats what I thought, just making sure.
Old 06-14-2005, 08:08 PM
  #8  
RolexNJ
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
RolexNJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

tammons: I did some research and found some information that may help you. Before I went with my 951 3.0L 8V project, I actually wanted a 1995 968 and was then thinking about turbo charging it. I remember reading a very good article on this topic too.

I just look in my closet and found it. If you can, get a copy of Excellence February 2004. There is a great article that talks about 2 engine builders who did this with a 968. Both have two different approaches to it. One is www.andersonmotorworksinc.com and the other is www.powerhaus.com. I'm sure you know of both of them. Anyway, it's a very good article and will tell you what they did.

And I will have to agree with Fast951 on his one comment. Where he said it will be more unique and valuable, very good points. Anyway, I hope that information is useful to you.

Cheers,

Old 06-14-2005, 08:18 PM
  #9  
tammons
Pro
Thread Starter
 
tammons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If that was a yellow 968 with racing flares on it I saw the article, but it seems like it was older than that. I think that car was built by prototech or porsche tech down here. It had the intercooler right on top in front of the engine.

I can handle the exhaust side, and actually I would probably depart from the 951 hot side setup.

If I was going to go to the trouble of T'ing a 968 i would probably also run some TWM throttle bodies and a tec III.
Old 06-14-2005, 08:18 PM
  #10  
tammons
Pro
Thread Starter
 
tammons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 608
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Oh can a 968 transaxle handle some serious HP ??
Old 06-14-2005, 08:32 PM
  #11  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Rumors has it that the 6-spd is much stronger than the 5-spd.
Old 06-14-2005, 09:08 PM
  #12  
special tool
Banned
 
special tool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: limbo....
Posts: 8,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Guys - you have no idea the power that John has put through his 968 transaxle - leave it at that.
Old 06-14-2005, 09:40 PM
  #13  
tconn
Three Wheelin'
 
tconn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Tennesee
Posts: 1,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What would be the ballpark cost of building a 3L 16V that put out over 500hp?
One that would be reliable and durable .
Old 06-14-2005, 10:28 PM
  #14  
fast951
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
fast951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 6,885
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

A 3L 16V would set you back $10-20K easy (on top of the engine). It all depends on how much you do yourself, which component and which engine management you go with.
Easy break down, rough numbers, things can escalate at a very fast rate!!!
- Block prep (sleeve, pistons, rods): $3-4K
- Head prep: $1.5-4K
- Exhaust/Intake: $1-2.5K
- Turbo/WG: $$$$
- Standalone Engine management: $3-6K + Dyno tuning.. OR
- Motronic tuning/MAF.. $2K
- Engine rebuild parts/Misc: $2-3K
- Engine tear down/assembly labor: $$$$

These are rough numbers as a general rule, things can and WILL vary greatly. Contact your engine builder of choice for an accurate estimate.
Old 06-15-2005, 02:07 AM
  #15  
Tom M'Guinn

Rennlist Member
 
Tom M'Guinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Just CA Now :)
Posts: 12,567
Received 535 Likes on 287 Posts
Default

If I were still in FLA, I'd probably would have gone the 968 route. Instead, I'll be putting an 8v 3 liter in my 86 951 so I can pass smog. The other issue on the 968 is the intercooler mounting location. Cost you ask? More than one could ever justify...if one felt compelled to justify it...


Quick Reply: 951 #L vs 968 turbo question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:16 AM.