Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Sway Bars Again...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-03-2004, 01:45 PM
  #1  
Night Rider
6th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Night Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Sway Bars Again...

What is a standard set-up on a 1991 Turbo S?

Mine is 26.8mm front and 16mm rear.

Should it not be 18mm at the back?

I am thinking of going with 968 M030 pack where the front is 30mm and the rear is 19mm anyway but if I would only upgrade the rear to 18mm what would be the effect? More oversteer?

Thanks.
Old 08-03-2004, 04:47 PM
  #2  
Jason @ Paragon Products
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Jason @ Paragon Products's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Corpus Christi, Texas
Posts: 1,463
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Sounds like it's not a US spec car, but in the US the 88 Turbo S used 26.8 on the front and 18 on the rear. The 89 Turbo (S spec) used 26.8 on the front and 16 on the rear.
__________________
Your Porsche Parts Superstore

Parts | Tech-Session | Facebook | Youtube

Jason Burkett
Paragon Products - Porsche Parts & Accessories*- 800.200.9366
Tech Session - Porsche Tech & Info*- 361.289.8834
jason@paragon-products.com
Old 08-03-2004, 05:15 PM
  #3  
badass951
Three Wheelin'
 
badass951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Night Rider
What is a standard set-up on a 1991 Turbo S?

Mine is 26.8mm front and 16mm rear.

Should it not be 18mm at the back?

I am thinking of going with 968 M030 pack where the front is 30mm and the rear is 19mm anyway but if I would only upgrade the rear to 18mm what would be the effect? More oversteer?

Thanks.
Less oversteer, more understeer.
Old 08-03-2004, 06:06 PM
  #4  
johne
Burning Brakes
 
johne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Umm, are you sure he would be increasing the fronts anti-sway more than the rear. This would increase the front's grip more than the rear. Thereby adding oversteer.

John
Old 08-03-2004, 08:29 PM
  #5  
badass951
Three Wheelin'
 
badass951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: State College, PA
Posts: 1,362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johne
Umm, are you sure he would be increasing the fronts anti-sway more than the rear. This would increase the front's grip more than the rear. Thereby adding oversteer.

John
Yes, I am sure. More understeer, not more oversteer!
Old 08-04-2004, 03:13 AM
  #6  
Danno
Race Director
 
Danno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 14,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

"Umm, are you sure he would be increasing the fronts anti-sway more than the rear. This would increase the front's grip more than the rear. Thereby adding oversteer."

Sway bars do nothing to improve overall grip. They just determine the front/rear split of the lateral weight-transfer due to cornering. So the stiffer end gets more of the weight-transfer than the other end. The end with the more weight will end up overcoming its tyre-grip and sliding earlier.

So a stiffer front bar will cause the front end to slide earlier than before, thus more understeer.
Old 08-04-2004, 08:57 AM
  #7  
Night Rider
6th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Night Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jason @ Paragon Products
Sounds like it's not a US spec car, but in the US the 88 Turbo S used 26.8 on the front and 18 on the rear. The 89 Turbo (S spec) used 26.8 on the front and 16 on the rear.
Why did porsche change it? To make car less tail happy? Does it feel different?
Old 08-04-2004, 09:02 AM
  #8  
Night Rider
6th Gear
Thread Starter
 
Night Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: London
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Danno
"Umm, are you sure he would be increasing the fronts anti-sway more than the rear. This would increase the front's grip more than the rear. Thereby adding oversteer."

Sway bars do nothing to improve overall grip. They just determine the front/rear split of the lateral weight-transfer due to cornering. So the stiffer end gets more of the weight-transfer than the other end. The end with the more weight will end up overcoming its tyre-grip and sliding earlier.

So a stiffer front bar will cause the front end to slide earlier than before, thus more understeer.
So Danno to upgrade to M030 pack means;

less body roll,

same grip,

but snappier back end?
Old 08-04-2004, 09:03 AM
  #9  
DanR 1201
Instructor
 
DanR 1201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

However, if there is less body roll and consequently less camber change, the extra weight transfer due to the stiffer bar can be more than offset by the improved grip. One of those things where suspension tuning often ends up as a black art inspite of the science.
Old 08-04-2004, 11:36 AM
  #10  
Waterguy
Three Wheelin'
 
Waterguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Night Rider
Why did porsche change it? To make car less tail happy? Does it feel different?
Yes and yes. The increased torque of the 944S2 and the combination of torque and standard LSD on the 951S makes it easier to induce throttle oversteer, by accident in the case of an inexperienced driver. I think Porsche responded by setting up more understeer in the suspension; they made the change early in the 1989 model year. I have the stock suspension with 26.8/16 mm bars and I understeered like a pig during the last autocross. Softening the front struts helped a bit. I can still induce throttle oversteer at DE days, however.
Old 08-04-2004, 12:20 PM
  #11  
Asarus
Pro
 
Asarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: France (78)
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Night Rider,

You have the genuine setup for a 1991 951

The rear sway bar was 18mm for 1988 Turbo S and 1989 951. It changed to 16mm in mid-89 model year.

BTW, a 1991 951 cannot be called a Turbo S but a Turbo. The "Turbo S" model is the limited edition in 1988 (only). Since 1989, the 951 is just called "944 Turbo" even if the 1989 951 is almost the same as the 1988 Turbo S.
Old 08-04-2004, 03:53 PM
  #12  
Danno
Race Director
 
Danno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 14,075
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

"So Danno to upgrade to M030 pack means;
less body roll,
same grip,
but snappier back end?"


Well, there's multiple factors going on here and what we are doing is juggling them all to be optimised. DanR is right on. Typically the stock car is set up such that we have lots of body-roll and the bars are set up with understeer. What this means is that the front wheels will reach 100% of their grip-limit while the rears may be at only 75%. The roll also causes positive camber-gain on the outside tyre; another reason the front tyres slip first and cause understeer.

There are multiple ways we can improve grip. One way is to stiffen up the front end to reduce body-roll using stiffer springs or a front bar. Both ways will increase lateral-weight transfer to the front wheels, but it's more than offset by the increased grip from a flatter contact patch. So you may end up with a sliding at 100% grip in front with only 65% in rear, but that 100% in front will be higher than before.

Then even better is to get stiffer springs & sway-bar in the rear as well. Now we can split more of the lateral weight-transfer to the rear tyres. If we juggle our bar-sizes correctly, we can end up with a situation where both front and rear tyres hit 100% of the grip-limits at the same time. This 100/100% grip limit will then be faster than the 100/75 or 100/65% split we had before because now we're getting the most from both outside tyres.

With the reduced body-roll, we also get more grip from the inside tyres as well since they're flatter now. So we actualy still have the same total grip as before, since that's just based upon how much weight is on each tyre, but we're balancing the weight transfers such that no one tyre is overloaded compared to the rest.



Quick Reply: Sway Bars Again...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:18 PM.