Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

S2 trans, with NA 5th gear??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2024, 10:53 AM
  #16  
Nowanker
Burning Brakes
 
Nowanker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Formerly the DPRK, now seeking political asylum in Oregon
Posts: 1,112
Received 548 Likes on 331 Posts
Default

S2 = Shorter final drive. Otherwise same gearing, and probably gearset as well.
Old 07-12-2024, 03:10 AM
  #17  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nowanker
S2 = Shorter final drive. Otherwise same gearing, and probably gearset as well.
Not quite. The 5th gear ratio in the turbo is 0.8286 and in the S2 it's 0.7778. Also in the turbo the 1st and 2nd are hardened but I don't think they are in the S2.
Old 07-12-2024, 11:41 AM
  #18  
Nowanker
Burning Brakes
 
Nowanker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Formerly the DPRK, now seeking political asylum in Oregon
Posts: 1,112
Received 548 Likes on 331 Posts
Default

Thought hardened 1st and 2nd was only in the Turbo S box?
Old 07-12-2024, 08:09 PM
  #19  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nowanker
Thought hardened 1st and 2nd was only in the Turbo S box?
Hmm...maybe. Would need a more qualified opinion than mine like Kevin Gross or Jim/Oddjob.
Old 07-13-2024, 11:39 AM
  #20  
Nowanker
Burning Brakes
 
Nowanker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Formerly the DPRK, now seeking political asylum in Oregon
Posts: 1,112
Received 548 Likes on 331 Posts
Default

Back in 'the day', the Turbo S boxes were coveted, and I think that was one of the reasons.
Interesting to note that the S2 box has a taller 5th.
Old 07-15-2024, 07:34 PM
  #21  
Oddjob
Rennlist Member
 
Oddjob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Midwest - US
Posts: 4,658
Received 70 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Memory might be failing...

My offhand recollection is that the Turbo S AOR transmission had harder or additional case hardening process performed on the 1st and 2nd integral gear teeth of the input shaft. I've only ever seen it written in a qualitative way, never an actual Rc or Brinell hardness increase vs stock. So I don't know how much harder/stronger the teeth are, if it's a significant or insignificant difference. I don't recall seeing or hearing of notable failures of the 1st and 2nd gear teeth on the non AOR input shafts over the years. I've used 9U, 5R, AOR, AOS/T transmissions in track cars, and haven't broke a 1st or 2nd gear. Concern would be with launching, higher power.

And I'm pretty sure the PET part number shown for the AOS/AOT S2 transmissions is the same AOR Turbo S input shaft part number. But the question is when/if the actual Turbo S input shafts were installed in the S2 transmissions during assembly, or if old stock standard Turbo input shafts were used until supplies were exhausted. I don't know if the actual shafts can be told apart - I don't know if there are stampings/markings or coloration of the teeth that can be used to differentiate an AOR vs non AOR.

The AOR transmissions were also desirable for the included LSD and external oil cooler.


Old 07-16-2024, 05:36 AM
  #22  
blade7
Drifting
 
blade7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England UK
Posts: 2,256
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

AFAIK the hardened shafts became standard spec with the 250 bhp uprate, along with the LSD and cooler loop. I think the LSD was an option on 220 bhp cars.
Old 07-16-2024, 07:25 PM
  #23  
JET951
Drifting
 
JET951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,642
Received 98 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

In Aus the 1989 cars were all specced as turbo S although not advertised as S. In 1990 Porsche Cars Australia then specced almost all the 944 turbos as base as they could get to get the price down. So they would be non M030, Non LSD, most did have the oil cooler
Regards
Sean
Old 07-17-2024, 03:23 AM
  #24  
333pg333
Rennlist Member
 
333pg333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 18,924
Received 97 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JET951
In Aus the 1989 cars were all specced as turbo S although not advertised as S. In 1990 Porsche Cars Australia then specced almost all the 944 turbos as base as they could get to get the price down. So they would be non M030, Non LSD, most did have the oil cooler
Regards
Sean
Sean do you know if there is any difference between pre '89 and '89+ as far as gear hardness goes?
Old 07-21-2024, 07:42 PM
  #25  
JET951
Drifting
 
JET951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 2,642
Received 98 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 333pg333
Sean do you know if there is any difference between pre '89 and '89+ as far as gear hardness goes?
I use to know this, I think from memory its the tater turbo gearboxes, It should be mentioned in the new car features I will have a look a little later.
Old 07-26-2024, 09:59 PM
  #26  
KevinGross
Rennlist Member
 
KevinGross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Stow, MA, USA
Posts: 1,503
Received 166 Likes on 110 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nowanker
Thought hardened 1st and 2nd was only in the Turbo S box?
The 016.311.105.AL input shaft introduced with the Turbo S superseded the 016.311.105.T previously used. There is no documentation indicating if or when the supersession was used in the S2 transmissions: maybe yes, maybe no. I suspect VW used up their inventory of the .T in the S2 boxes and then flipped to the .AL. Who knows. I stock them, keep an eye on 1st and 2nd when servicing, and if I find cracking or wear, replace.

The base 944 is not immune to issues with these gears on the input shaft. With age and lack of attention to lube, I see problems.
The following users liked this post:
333pg333 (07-27-2024)



Quick Reply: S2 trans, with NA 5th gear??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:00 AM.