Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Before and After

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2004, 08:31 PM
  #1  
billgot
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
billgot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cherry Hill,N.J
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Before and After

Results of lindsey racing parts.


Before: Powerhaus Extrude hone intake, stock intercooler.330WRHP 350WRTQ. 1.25 bar boost

After: Lindsey Racing Intake,Stage V intercooler. 343WRHP 381 RWTQ.1.15 bar boost.

Overall a little pricey but results are worth in in TQ alone.I should of went to 1.25 bar boost just to see how much I could squeeze.
Old 06-16-2004, 08:40 PM
  #2  
CPTdooberhead
Drifting
 
CPTdooberhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 2,461
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

wow, thats a lot of money for the power difference. I would have liked to see what it would make at the same boost level though. Im curious what kind of difference the parts make on their own...
Old 06-16-2004, 09:53 PM
  #3  
tazman
Three Wheelin'
 
tazman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Reading PA
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you have the dyno sheets? It would be interesting to see the difference in the curves.
Old 06-16-2004, 10:05 PM
  #4  
SamGrant951
Race Director
 
SamGrant951's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 10,861
Received 34 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

nice numbers...and pics of the dyno chart?
Old 06-17-2004, 04:20 AM
  #5  
emwporsche
Three Wheelin'
 
emwporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

temp, humidity, heat soak, same dyno, all come into play. that is a huge diff.
good to know though
Old 06-17-2004, 04:21 AM
  #6  
NZ951
Race Director
 
NZ951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Zealand massive
Posts: 13,778
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

So that was what $1500 odd slides?
Old 06-17-2004, 04:26 AM
  #7  
Sami951
Drifting
 
Sami951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Espoo, Finland
Posts: 2,668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Did you turn the boost down, or was it just an effect of the larger intercooler? (charge air coming from the turbo is at xx pressure before/after, but once through the larger cooler, the same amount of air should be a bit cooler -> less pressure in the manifold (just as much flow though))
Old 06-17-2004, 10:57 AM
  #8  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Do you think they both played a part in the gains or more the intake??
Old 06-17-2004, 11:19 AM
  #9  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would love to see the run with the same boost level.
Old 06-17-2004, 11:37 AM
  #10  
Duke
Nordschleife Master
 
Duke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 5,552
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Yeah dyno run at the same boost level would be very interesting. I would not be surprised if you'd gain over 20hp by that alone.

Also, I think the gains of the intake manifold would be much greater in use together with other top-end breathing mods. Like a cam.

But nevertheless, 343 rwhp at 1,15 bar is very good results!
Old 06-17-2004, 11:40 AM
  #11  
jimbo1111
Banned
 
jimbo1111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 3,687
Received 37 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

From your dyno chart. It looks like you programed the ebc for a boost spike around peak TQ. Were both runs on 104? Those are very good results for those mods. If all was equal.
Old 06-17-2004, 05:23 PM
  #12  
billgot
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
billgot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cherry Hill,N.J
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Both dyno,s were the same.But not at the same place.Temp was about the same nice 72-78 degrees.Humidity was about the same I only goto the dyno on nice days because of that reason.I had no way to adjust my fuel at the other dyno and I was running rich.I will put up both dyno charts up again, the other one is so bad in curve and average power across the board it hurts for me to look at it.I also had race gas in when I dynoed before.I only did 3 runs before because the cost was high and I had no way to adjust many things except boost.there was also one difference the older dyno was done in third gear where the new one was 4th.From what I am told the lower the gear the bigger numbers you will get.I will also put my very first dyno with all powerhaus parts up for you to see.



Quick Reply: Before and After



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:01 PM.