Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

Why less boost in hot weather?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-11-2004, 07:58 PM
  #46  
rage2
Three Wheelin'
 
rage2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,596
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm still not convinved it's a wastegate issue. I tried to combat this by upgrading to a deltagate as well as an AVC-R. I would ALWAYS run less boost when it's hot, regardless of settings. Frustrating as hell.

I upgraded the turbo, injectors, standalone next, and the problem went away. It'd ALWAYS run the same amount of boost regardless of temperature, humidity, pressure, whatever. It'd feel faster on cold days, slower on hot days (air density), but boost pressure would show the same.

So my theory is still gonna be somethign to do with the turbo's efficiency range, and not enough time to spool to high enough boost on warm days before running out of steam .
Old 06-11-2004, 08:31 PM
  #47  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Okay. here's my take:

The reason we show less boost in hot weather/high alt is because our Boost Gauges are based on Absolute Pressure, which means they add the current atmospheric pressure to your current manifold pressure.

If your boost gauge was calibrated, it would always show just over 1bar at 15psi. But since our boost gauges are in absolute, it shows just over 2 bar at 15psi, at sea level. But as the weather gets hotter, and the air gets thinner, that 2 bar drops to 1.9 or 1.8 bar.

make sense?
Old 06-11-2004, 09:00 PM
  #48  
Tomas L
Pro
 
Tomas L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Boden, Sweden
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

JustinL:
The temp rise over the turbo is the same on a hot day as a cold day unless the turbo get very much outside it's efficieny range. This means that if you on a day with 10°C ambient have a temp after the turbo of 80°C, then you will have 100°C on a day with 30°C ambient temp.

This also means that the cooling effect in the ic will be the same. Say that when you try to cool the 80°C charge with the 10°C ambient air you end up with 40°C out of the IC. Then you will get 60°C when you cool the 100°C air with the 30°C air.

You cant use the gas law on an open system as the IC is. It only applies on closed volumes. The pressure drop over the ic must be calculated with fluid flow formulas.

Tomas
Old 06-11-2004, 09:04 PM
  #49  
Tomas L
Pro
 
Tomas L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Boden, Sweden
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rich:
Just because the ambient temperature is higher or lower doesn't necessarily mean that the air pressure is higher or lower. What you are describing is the effect of changes in barometric pressure, not air temp.

Tomas
Old 06-11-2004, 09:15 PM
  #50  
Rich Sandor
Nordschleife Master
 
Rich Sandor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 8,985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Ahh Tomas, you are right. The BAR reading should not drop as a result of temperature, only as a result of lower atmospheric pressure.
Old 06-12-2004, 04:25 AM
  #51  
JustinL
Drifting
 
JustinL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Edmonton AB
Posts: 3,299
Received 184 Likes on 102 Posts
Default

I gotcha Thomas. I was trying to point out the assumptions that I was making as I went along, and you are right... assuming temp difference before and after the intercooler is linear from hot days to cool days. And not addressing the heat soak issue. But yes I think the effect of changing intercooler efficiency is fairly small, but if there was any effect from it, it would lead toward the observation of less bost on hot days.

Still theorizing,

Justin
Old 06-12-2004, 12:08 PM
  #52  
TurboTommy
Rennlist Member
 
TurboTommy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,589
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I will state it again; the answer to the orginal question, which has nothing to do with IC eff. at different temps, altitude , or any other speculative theories.

The root of all this is a turbocharger phenomenon. The turbo rotating assembly has to spin faster and faster to make the same amount of boost out of proportionally higher and higher ambient temps. That's it; that's the reason.
Now, this will manifest itself in different ways. With the majority of our 951's, having a relative high sensitivity to back pressure (the way the wastegate is setup), it will show itself in a slightly earlier opening of the wastegate, because there is a little bit more back pressure because the turbo wants to spin faster to achieve the desired boost with the higher ambient temperature.
It doesn't matter what boost controller you use; if any wastegate is even a little bit affected by extra heat and/or flow this phenomenon will occur to a greater or lesser extent, depending on the setup.

Rage,
a bigger turbo that flows alot more air isn't even phased by all this because the back pressure might only go up a very small amount relative to the extra work it needs to do in the warmer ambient temps; therefore no loss of boost.

It used to be that some compressor maps were even published with correction factors according to ambient temps (if the ambient temperature varied from a certain standard, turbo RPM would go up and down to achieve x amount of boost).
Old 06-12-2004, 12:36 PM
  #53  
toddk911
Drive-by provocation guy
Rennlist Member
 
toddk911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: NAS PAX River, by way of Orlando
Posts: 10,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"With the majority of our 951's, having a relative high sensitivity to back pressure (the way the wastegate is setup), it will show itself in a slightly earlier opening of the wastegate, because there is a little bit more back pressure because the turbo wants to spin faster to achieve the desired boost with the higher ambient temperature."

I can attest to this point as last summer I had stock exhaust and would see 1.5-2psi loss on hot days. Now, with a 3"cat back (no cat/flowmaster) I have only seen about 1 psi drop in 2nd and 3rd 4th I have not noticed any less boost, or maybe .5 psi.



Quick Reply: Why less boost in hot weather?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:18 AM.