Notices
944 Turbo and Turbo-S Forum 1982-1991
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Clore Automotive

1/4 mile performance calculator

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-29-2004, 11:41 PM
  #1  
Jake951
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Jake951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Greater Boston
Posts: 1,930
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default 1/4 mile performance calculator

I saw this posted on Bimmerforums and thought it would be of interest here, too. It's a calculator for 1/4 mile ET and trap speed, based on just hp/weight ratio. Go here to take a "test drive". There are actually 3 different calculators there, all based on empirical formulas.

The "LRT" calculator provides the overall "best" match to a broad collection of data from Road & Track road tests. For a stock Turbo S (3200 lbs. est. and 247 hp) this calculator predicts 14.4 sec @ 98.4 mph. Back in 1988, Road & Track got 14.2 sec @ 100.5 mph, so the LRT calculator slightly underpredicts performance of the 951S.

What about a modified Turbo S? At 300 hp (keep in mind this is crank hp), LRT predicts 13.6 sec @ 104.6 mph. This would correspond to Turbo S with some decent chips. At 350 hp (my car with MAP), the numbers are 13.0 sec @ 109.8 mph. Given that the LRT calculator underpredicts a stock Turbo S, I would expect these numbers are a bit conservative.

Let the bench racing begin...
Old 05-30-2004, 12:40 AM
  #2  
atinybug
Racer
 
atinybug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: atlanta, ga
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

this is assuming everyone's got the same gear ratio, same size wheels, etc etc. but woohoo! 12.4 sec @ 115 mph go me! (in actuality, probably closer to 14.0 cuz i'm gonna launch like a granny so i dont break stuff)
Old 05-30-2004, 02:20 AM
  #3  
porshhhh951
Monkeys Removed by Request
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
porshhhh951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 7,713
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The LRT says 12.310 s @ 116.83


Ofcourse who know's how acurate this really is.

still very good fun.
Old 05-30-2004, 07:10 AM
  #4  
Tomas L
Pro
 
Tomas L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Boden, Sweden
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From what I've read, terminal speed should be a good indicator of engine power (vs. weight) . The E.T is dependant on many things, tire grip, chassis settings, gear, driver skill, etc. Terminal speed is more insensitive of these other factors.

Tomas
Old 05-30-2004, 11:40 AM
  #5  
Darius Juca
Burning Brakes
 
Darius Juca's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Orangevale, CA. USA
Posts: 1,201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

damn I though I would get better than low 12's in mine..can't be right!! or maybe it is.. scared to try it..i saw the video of the broken cv.....
Old 05-30-2004, 04:23 PM
  #6  
emwporsche
Three Wheelin'
 
emwporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: seattle
Posts: 1,692
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

12.4

remember that bhp is to the flywheel
so I added 11% to my rwhp

I have no lsd so I would really get a 13.7 or something!
Old 05-30-2004, 05:06 PM
  #7  
atinybug
Racer
 
atinybug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: atlanta, ga
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

oh, well in that case, 11.7 @ 122 mph
hehe



Quick Reply: 1/4 mile performance calculator



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:47 PM.